• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项有限元分析,旨在研究在上颌骨萎缩的全口四颗种植体情况下,种植体倾斜度和悬臂长度变化对远端种植体应力分布的影响。

A finite element analysis to study the stress distribution on distal implants in an all-on-four situation in atrophic maxilla as affected by the tilt of the implants and varying cantilever lengths.

作者信息

Kumari Anju, Malhotra Puja, Phogat Shefali, Yadav Bhupender, Yadav Jaiveer, Phukela Sumit Singh

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Oct-Dec;20(4):409-416. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_70_20. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

DOI:10.4103/jips.jips_70_20
PMID:33487969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7814689/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this work was to evaluate stress distribution on implants in All-on-Four situation with varying distal implant angulations (30°,40°,45°) and varying cantilever lengths (4 mm, 8 mm, 12 mm, 16 mm) in atrophic maxilla using finite element analysis.

SETTING AND DESIGN

A study, finite element analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

Three-dimensional finite element model of an edentulous maxilla restored with a prosthesis supported by four implants was reconstructed to carry out the analysis. Three different configurations, corresponding to 3 tilt degrees of the distal implants (30°, 40°, and 45°) were subjected to 4 loading simulations.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The results of the simulations obtained were evaluated in terms of Von Mises equivalent stress levels at the bone-implant interface.

RESULT

From a stress-level viewpoint, the 45° model was revealed to be the most critical for peri-implant bone. In all the loading simulations, the maximum stress values were always found at the neck of the distal implants. With increasing distal implant tilt, cantilever length reduces depending on the quality of bone. At 30° angulation of distal implant a maximum cantilever length of 16 mm may be given if the quality of bone is D3 but only 8 mm cantilever may be recommended if bone quality is D4. At 40° angulation, 16 mm in D3 bone and 0 mm in D4 bone whereas at 45° angulation, it reduces to 12 mm in D3 bone and no cantilever is recommended with D4 bone.

CONCLUSION

The 45° tilt induced higher stress values at the bone-implant interface, especially in the distal aspect, than the other 2 tilts analyzed. Stress values increased with increased cantilever length which was further influenced by the distal implant tilt and the quality of the bone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过有限元分析,评估在上颌骨萎缩的情况下,采用全口四颗种植体修复时,不同远端种植体角度(30°、40°、45°)和不同悬臂长度(4mm、8mm、12mm、16mm)时种植体上的应力分布情况。

设置与设计

一项有限元分析研究。

材料与方法

重建了一个无牙上颌骨的三维有限元模型,该模型采用由四颗种植体支持的修复体进行修复,以进行分析。对应于远端种植体的三种不同倾斜度(30°、40°和45°)的三种不同构型进行了4种加载模拟。

所用统计分析方法

根据种植体-骨界面处的冯·米塞斯等效应力水平对获得的模拟结果进行评估。

结果

从应力水平的角度来看,45°模型被证明对种植体周围骨最为关键。在所有加载模拟中,最大应力值总是出现在远端种植体的颈部。随着远端种植体倾斜度的增加,悬臂长度会根据骨质量而减小。如果骨质量为D3,远端种植体倾斜度为30°时,最大悬臂长度可为16mm,但如果骨质量为D4,则建议悬臂长度仅为8mm。在40°倾斜度下,D3骨中为16mm,D4骨中为0mm;而在45°倾斜度下,D3骨中减小至12mm,D4骨不建议使用悬臂。

结论

与分析的其他两种倾斜度相比,45°倾斜在种植体-骨界面处,尤其是在远端,会产生更高的应力值。应力值随着悬臂长度的增加而增加,悬臂长度还会受到远端种植体倾斜度和骨质量的进一步影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/6351b824e4f6/JIPS-20-409-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/00185ff23d6a/JIPS-20-409-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/c249bc94834c/JIPS-20-409-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/0ff10dccf13d/JIPS-20-409-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/9ca73b04f545/JIPS-20-409-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/2d38ff1548d0/JIPS-20-409-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/6351b824e4f6/JIPS-20-409-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/00185ff23d6a/JIPS-20-409-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/c249bc94834c/JIPS-20-409-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/0ff10dccf13d/JIPS-20-409-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/9ca73b04f545/JIPS-20-409-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/2d38ff1548d0/JIPS-20-409-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d3c/7814689/6351b824e4f6/JIPS-20-409-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A finite element analysis to study the stress distribution on distal implants in an all-on-four situation in atrophic maxilla as affected by the tilt of the implants and varying cantilever lengths.一项有限元分析,旨在研究在上颌骨萎缩的全口四颗种植体情况下,种植体倾斜度和悬臂长度变化对远端种植体应力分布的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Oct-Dec;20(4):409-416. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_70_20. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
2
All-on-4 concept: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.全口四植体概念:三维有限元分析
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Apr;41(2):163-71. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00312. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of implant-supported prosthesis with various tilting implant angles and bone types in atrophic maxilla: A finite element study.不同倾斜种植体角度和骨类型的种植体支持式修复体在萎缩上颌骨中的生物力学评估:有限元研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Jul 1;86:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Effects of Cantilever Length and Implant Inclination on the Stress Distribution of Mandibular Prosthetic Restorations Constructed from Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic.整体氧化锆陶瓷构建的下颌义齿修复体的悬臂长度和种植体倾斜角度对其应力分布的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):121-129. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7744.
5
Load transfer in tilted implants with varying cantilever lengths in an all-on-four situation.倾斜种植体在全口即刻负重情况下不同悬臂长度的负载转移。
Aust Dent J. 2012 Dec;57(4):440-5. doi: 10.1111/adj.12002. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
6
Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.种植体数量、长度和倾斜角度对萎缩上颌骨应力分布的影响:一项有限元研究。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 Jun;56(6):979-989. doi: 10.1007/s11517-017-1737-4. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
7
A Comparative Analysis on Two Types of Oral Implants, Bone-Level and Tissue-Level, with Different Cantilever Lengths of Fixed Prosthesis.两种不同基台长度的骨水平和软组织水平种植体的对比分析。
J Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;26(4):289-295. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12388. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
8
Comparison of stress distribution around all-on-four implants of different angulations and zygoma implants: a 7-model finite element analysis.不同倾斜角度的全口种植体和颧骨种植体周围的应力分布比较:7 模型有限元分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03761-x.
9
Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study.种植体支持的上颌后部修复体不同材料的生物力学行为:有限元研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Apr 15;24(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04142-8.
10
Biomechanical Comparison of Different Implant Inclinations and Cantilever Lengths in All-on-4 Treatment Concept by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.通过三维有限元分析比较All-on-4治疗理念中不同种植体倾斜度和悬臂长度的生物力学特性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):64-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6201.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive mathematical modeling of biomechanical behavior in all-on-4 implants design: effects of distal implant and occlusal load angulation using RSM based on FEA.全口四颗种植体设计中生物力学行为的预测数学建模:基于有限元分析使用响应曲面法研究远端种植体和咬合负载角度的影响
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 18;13:1644776. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1644776. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of Polymethyl Methacrylate as a Provisional Material in a Fully Digital Workflow for Immediate-Load Complete-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses over Three Months.在全数字化工作流程中,对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯作为临时材料用于即刻负重全牙弓种植支持式修复体三个月的评估。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jan 26;18(3):562. doi: 10.3390/ma18030562.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Correlation between abutment angulation and off-axial stresses on biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconium implants in the anterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.上颌前部钛和锆植入物生物力学行为中基台角度与离轴应力之间的相关性:一项三维有限元分析研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019 Oct-Dec;19(4):353-361. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_268_19. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
2
Influence of Implant Inclination and Prosthetic Abutment Type on the Biomechanics of Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures.种植体倾斜度和修复基台类型对种植体支持固定局部义齿生物力学的影响。
J Oral Implantol. 2019 Oct;45(5):343-350. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00305. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
Stress distribution pattern in all-on-four maxillary restorations supported by porous tantalum and solid titanium implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
使用三维有限元分析对多孔钽和实心钛种植体支持的全口四颗上颌修复体的应力分布模式进行研究。
Eur J Transl Myol. 2024 Feb 16;34(1). doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12170.
4
Difference in marginal bone loss around implants between short implant-supported partial fixed prostheses with and without cantilever: a retrospective clinical study.种植体支持的短桥体局部固定义齿有无悬臂梁对种植体边缘骨丧失的影响:一项回顾性临床研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Dec 1;9(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00515-w.
5
Influence of implant protrusion length and initial bone height on intrasinus bone gain in transalveolar sinus floor elevation without bone graft: a 2-year retrospective study.无骨移植经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升术中种植体突出长度和初始骨高度对上颌窦内骨增量的影响:一项为期2年的回顾性研究
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jun 5;85(7):3291-3297. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000870. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Biomechanical Comparison of Asymmetric Implant Configurations for All-on-Four Treatment Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.使用三维有限元分析对全口四颗种植治疗中不对称种植体配置的生物力学比较
Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;12(12):1963. doi: 10.3390/life12121963.
7
A comparative evaluation of stress distribution between an All-on-Four implant-supported prosthesis and the Trefoil implant-supported prosthesis: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.四全种植义齿修复与三叶种植义齿修复的应力分布比较:三维有限元分析研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jan-Mar;22(1):56-64. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_203_21.
8
Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept.全口 4 颗种植体即刻负重中不同悬臂长度的倾斜种植体周围的应力的生物力学分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02520-8.
9
Tilted implantation technique for edentulous patients.倾斜植入技术在无牙颌患者中的应用。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 1;39(4):377-385. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.04.002.
10
Clinical success between tilted and axial implants in edentulous maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无牙上颌中倾斜种植体和轴向种植体的临床效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jul-Sep;21(3):217-228. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_79_21.
Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review.
有限元模型在种植牙科中的应用:一项系统评价。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 May;11(Suppl 2):S85-S91. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_296_18.
4
Comparative effect of implant-abutment connections, abutment angulations, and screw lengths on preloaded abutment screw using three-dimensional finite element analysis: An study.使用三维有限元分析对种植体-基台连接、基台角度和螺钉长度对预加载基台螺钉的比较影响:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Apr-Jun;18(2):161-167. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_219_17.
5
The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review.全口四植体治疗理念:系统评价。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e474-e488. doi: 10.4317/jced.53613. eCollection 2017 Mar.
6
Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.三种不同种植体螺纹设计对应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):359-365. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.191283.
7
Mechanical properties of resin glass fiber-reinforced abutment in comparison to titanium abutment.树脂玻璃纤维增强基台与钛基台相比的力学性能。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 May-Jun;19(3):273-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.154184.
8
Oral health-related quality of life of removable partial denture wearers and related factors.可摘局部义齿佩戴者的口腔健康相关生活质量及相关因素。
J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Jan;42(1):40-8. doi: 10.1111/joor.12221. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
9
The all-on-four treatment concept: a systematic review.全口四植体治疗理念:一项系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Dec;16(6):836-55. doi: 10.1111/cid.12068. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
10
All-on-4 concept: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.全口四植体概念:三维有限元分析
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Apr;41(2):163-71. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00312. Epub 2013 Apr 5.