• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全口四颗种植体设计中生物力学行为的预测数学建模:基于有限元分析使用响应曲面法研究远端种植体和咬合负载角度的影响

Predictive mathematical modeling of biomechanical behavior in all-on-4 implants design: effects of distal implant and occlusal load angulation using RSM based on FEA.

作者信息

Murat Fahri, Sevinç Gül Sema Nur, Şensoy Abdullah Tahir

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Türkiye.

Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 18;13:1644776. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1644776. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1644776
PMID:40901251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12399523/
Abstract

This study presents a predictive biomechanical modeling approach for optimizing distal implant placement in the All-on-4 treatment concept, with a focus on implant angulation and occlusal load direction. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was integrated with Response Surface Methodology (RSM) to develop 15 simulation models based on a Central Composite Design, incorporating distal implant angulations of 15°, 30°, and 45°, and occlusal load directions in both sagittal and frontal planes (45°, 67.5°, and 90°). The maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone was selected as the response variable. Regression analysis revealed that the frontal load angle had the most significant effect on stress distribution, followed by implant angulation. The resulting second-order predictive model demonstrated a strong statistical fit (R = 93.39%, adjusted R = 81.49%). The lowest cortical stress (95.75 MPa) occurred at 15° implant angulation with 45° occlusal loading in both planes, whereas the highest stress (265.72 MPa) was recorded at 45° angulation with 90° frontal loading. Although reducing implant tilt generally decreases peri-implant stress, no universally optimal angle can be defined due to variability in biomechanical responses under different occlusal loading conditions. Clinically, optimizing cusp inclination and load direction in conjunction with implant positioning may enhance the biomechanical performance and long-term success of full-arch implant-supported prostheses.

摘要

本研究提出了一种预测性生物力学建模方法,用于优化“All-on-4”治疗理念中远端种植体的植入位置,重点关注种植体角度和咬合负荷方向。将有限元分析(FEA)与响应面方法(RSM)相结合,基于中心复合设计开发了15个模拟模型,纳入了15°、30°和45°的远端种植体角度,以及矢状面和额状面(45°、67.5°和90°)的咬合负荷方向。选择皮质骨中的最大von Mises应力作为响应变量。回归分析表明,额状面负荷角度对应力分布的影响最为显著,其次是种植体角度。所得的二阶预测模型显示出很强的统计拟合度(R = 93.39%,调整后R = 81.49%)。最低皮质应力(95.75MPa)出现在种植体角度为15°且两个平面的咬合负荷均为45°时,而最高应力(265.72MPa)记录在角度为45°且额状面负荷为90°时。虽然减少种植体倾斜通常会降低种植体周围应力,但由于不同咬合负荷条件下生物力学反应的变异性,无法定义一个普遍最优的角度。临床上,结合种植体定位优化牙尖倾斜度和负荷方向,可能会提高全牙弓种植体支持修复体的生物力学性能和长期成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/d337b09fca94/fbioe-13-1644776-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/17d57b66b7d6/fbioe-13-1644776-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/fcd164a04101/fbioe-13-1644776-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/9c8c672ee18b/fbioe-13-1644776-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/bf486e67cb35/fbioe-13-1644776-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/02513c5cb89a/fbioe-13-1644776-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/de3528bfa42e/fbioe-13-1644776-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/53e29895dc3c/fbioe-13-1644776-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/da0a9eb52ed9/fbioe-13-1644776-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/6dd1516748be/fbioe-13-1644776-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/61a40517478a/fbioe-13-1644776-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/d337b09fca94/fbioe-13-1644776-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/17d57b66b7d6/fbioe-13-1644776-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/fcd164a04101/fbioe-13-1644776-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/9c8c672ee18b/fbioe-13-1644776-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/bf486e67cb35/fbioe-13-1644776-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/02513c5cb89a/fbioe-13-1644776-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/de3528bfa42e/fbioe-13-1644776-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/53e29895dc3c/fbioe-13-1644776-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/da0a9eb52ed9/fbioe-13-1644776-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/6dd1516748be/fbioe-13-1644776-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/61a40517478a/fbioe-13-1644776-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1486/12399523/d337b09fca94/fbioe-13-1644776-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive mathematical modeling of biomechanical behavior in all-on-4 implants design: effects of distal implant and occlusal load angulation using RSM based on FEA.全口四颗种植体设计中生物力学行为的预测数学建模:基于有限元分析使用响应曲面法研究远端种植体和咬合负载角度的影响
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 18;13:1644776. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1644776. eCollection 2025.
2
Finite Element Analysis of Novaloc Attachments at Extreme Angulations and Arch Forms: A Specification Study.新型附件在极端角度和牙弓形态下的有限元分析:一项规格研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Aug;27(4):e70082. doi: 10.1111/cid.70082.
3
Comparison of the biomechanical effect of distal implants placed at different angles in the all-on-four technique: A nonlinear finite element analysis.全口四颗种植技术中不同角度植入远端种植体的生物力学效应比较:非线性有限元分析
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Nov 27:102157. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102157.
4
Biomechanical behavior of immediately placed implant using bone graft and socket shield techniques: a 3D finite element analysis.使用骨移植和牙槽窝屏障技术即刻种植体的生物力学行为:三维有限元分析
Head Face Med. 2025 Aug 13;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00537-2.
5
Comparison of Different Frameworks and Implant Angulations in All-On-Four and Six Concepts: A Finite Element Analysis.全口四颗和六颗种植概念中不同框架与种植体角度的比较:有限元分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Aug;27(4):e70078. doi: 10.1111/cid.70078.
6
Biomechanical Analysis of Various Connector Designs of Dental Implant Complex: A Numerical Finite Element Study.牙种植复合体不同连接设计的生物力学分析:一项数值有限元研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 26;75(4):100873. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100873.
7
Effect of Bone Quality, Implant Length, and Loading Timing on Stress Transmission in the Posterior Mandible: A Finite Element Analysis.骨质量、种植体长度和加载时机对下颌后牙区应力传递的影响:有限元分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;12(8):888. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12080888.
8
Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.单颗种植体固位覆盖义齿:通过有限元分析评估种植体长度和直径对其应力分布的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2024 Apr;33(4):348-357. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13795. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
The effect of occlusal morphology of implant-supported prosthesis, support configuration, and build angulation on the number of isolated islands in a 3D printing slicing software.种植体支持式修复体的咬合形态、支持结构和构建角度对三维打印切片软件中孤立岛数量的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Jul 26. doi: 10.1111/jopr.70004.

本文引用的文献

1
Advances in 3D Printing Applications for Personalized Orthopedic Surgery: From Anatomical Modeling to Patient-Specific Implants.用于个性化骨科手术的3D打印应用进展:从解剖模型到定制植入物。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 5;14(11):3989. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113989.
2
Investigation of Stress Distribution Between Two Different Implant Concepts in Implant- Supported Maxillary Prostheses with Different Framework Materials: A Finite Element Study.不同框架材料的种植体支持上颌修复体中两种不同种植体概念之间应力分布的研究:一项有限元研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2025 May 21;38(3):331-338. doi: 10.11607/ijp.9268.
3
Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis of Two Types of Short-Angled Implants Across Various Bone Classifications.
两种短角度种植体在不同骨分类中的生物力学有限元分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;17(23):5680. doi: 10.3390/ma17235680.
4
Correlation between implant angulation and crestal bone changes: A 5-year retrospective study.种植体角度与牙槽嵴顶骨变化之间的相关性:一项5年回顾性研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jan;133(1):162.e1-162.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
A Finite Element Analysis to Study the Stress Distribution on Distal Implants in All-on-Six Treatment Concepts as Affected Tilted and Short Implant.一项有限元分析研究受倾斜和短种植体影响的全六治疗概念中远端种植体的应力分布。
J Oral Implantol. 2024 Jun 1;50(3):245-253. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00092.
6
Assessment of Stress Distribution Around Dental Implants Based on the All-on-Four Treatment Concept using Finite Element Analysis.基于“全口四颗”治疗理念,运用有限元分析评估牙种植体周围的应力分布
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S907-S909. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_55_23. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
In Silico Mechanical Effort Analysis of the All-On-4 Design Performed With Platform-Switching Distal Short Dental Implants.基于平台转换的远中端短种植体的 All-On-4 设计的计算机力学效能分析。
J Biomech Eng. 2023 Sep 1;145(9). doi: 10.1115/1.4062540.
8
Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load.种植体支持基台不同角度下轴向和斜向加载时周围骨组织的三维有限元应力模式分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2023 Jan 1;24(1):16-20. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3464.
9
Application of 3D Printing in Bone Grafts.3D 打印在骨移植中的应用。
Cells. 2023 Mar 10;12(6):859. doi: 10.3390/cells12060859.
10
Biomechanical Comparison of Asymmetric Implant Configurations for All-on-Four Treatment Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.使用三维有限元分析对全口四颗种植治疗中不对称种植体配置的生物力学比较
Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;12(12):1963. doi: 10.3390/life12121963.