Knight Walter E, Ali Hadi R, Nakano Stephanie J, Wilson Cortney E, Walker Lori A, Woulfe Kathleen C
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.
Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 8;11:616996. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.616996. eCollection 2020.
Cardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and thousands of manuscripts each year are aimed at elucidating mechanisms underlying cardiac disease. The methods for quantifying cardiac performance are quite varied, with each technique assessing unique features of cardiac muscle mechanical properties. Accordingly, in this review, we discuss current methods for quantifying cardiac muscle performance, highlighting what can be learned from each method, and how each technique can be used in conjunction to complement others for a more comprehensive understanding of cardiac function. Importantly, cardiac function can be assessed at several different levels, from the whole organ down to individual protein-protein interactions. Here, we take a reductionist view of methods that are commonly used to measure the distinct aspects of cardiac mechanical function, beginning with whole heart preparations and finishing with the motility assay. While each of the techniques are individually well-documented in the literature, there is a significant need for a comparison of the techniques, delineating the mechanical parameters that can are best measured with each technique, as well as the strengths and weaknesses inherent to each method. Additionally, we will consider complementary techniques and how these methods can be used in combination to improve our understanding of cardiac mechanical function. By presenting each of these methods, with their strengths and limitations, in a single manuscript, this review will assist cardiovascular biologists in understanding the existing literature on cardiac mechanical function, as well as designing future experiments.
心血管疾病仍然是美国发病和死亡的主要原因,每年有数千篇论文致力于阐明心脏病的潜在机制。量化心脏功能的方法多种多样,每种技术都评估心肌机械特性的独特特征。因此,在本综述中,我们讨论了目前量化心肌功能的方法,强调了每种方法能学到什么,以及如何将每种技术结合起来相互补充,以更全面地了解心脏功能。重要的是,心脏功能可以在几个不同层面进行评估,从整个器官到单个蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用。在这里,我们以还原论的观点来看待常用于测量心脏机械功能不同方面的方法,从全心脏标本开始,以运动分析结束。虽然每种技术在文献中都有单独的详细记载,但非常需要对这些技术进行比较,明确每种技术最适合测量的机械参数,以及每种方法固有的优缺点。此外,我们将考虑互补技术以及如何将这些方法结合使用,以增进我们对心脏机械功能的理解。通过在一篇论文中介绍每种方法及其优缺点,本综述将帮助心血管生物学家理解关于心脏机械功能的现有文献,并设计未来的实验。