Ayala Francisco, Moreno-Pérez Víctor, Vera-Garcia Francisco J, Moya Manuel, Sanz-Rivas David, Fernandez-Fernandez Jaime
Sports Research Centre, Miguel Hernandez University, Elche, Spain.
Tennis Performance Research Group, Madrid, Spain.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 12;11(4):e0152790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152790. eCollection 2016.
Despite the large number of studies that have examined the acute effects of different warm up modalities (WU) on physical performance, none of them have documented the time course of potential performance recovery in tennis players. The aim of this study was twofold: (a) to analyze and compare the acute effects of two different WU modalities (traditional WU [TWU] and dynamic WU [DWU]) on physical performance (i.e., CMJ, sprint, serve speed and accuracy) in elite junior players, as well as (b) to monitor the time course of any WU-induced changes after 30 and 60 min of simulated match-play. Twelve junior elite players completed both WUs modalities (TWU and DWU) in a counterbalanced order on separate days. In each experimental session, counter movement jump (CMJ), 20-m sprint, tennis serve speed and accuracy tests were performed before (immediately after TWU or DWU) during (30 min) and after 60 min of a simulated match play. Measures were compared via four factorial (WU intervention and time) repeated measures ANOVAs. There were main effects of WU (TWU and DWU) throughout the time for all the variables analysed. The results indicate that DWU routine led to significantly faster 20 m sprint times and higher CMJs as well as faster and more accurate tennis serves at both post warm-up and 30 min match-play testing moments in comparison with the scores reported by the TWU routine (p < 0.05; positive effects with a probability of >75-99%). No significant intergroup differences were found at 60-min match-play testing moment in any variable (except for the 20 m sprint). Therefore, the findings of this study recommend for optimal performance in these elite tennis players, DWU routines should be performed prior to formal training and competition rather than TWU routines.
尽管已有大量研究探讨了不同热身方式(WU)对身体机能的急性影响,但尚无研究记录网球运动员潜在机能恢复的时间进程。本研究的目的有两个:(a)分析和比较两种不同热身方式(传统热身[TWU]和动态热身[DWU])对精英青少年球员身体机能(即纵跳、短跑、发球速度和准确性)的急性影响,以及(b)监测模拟比赛30分钟和60分钟后任何热身引起的变化的时间进程。12名青少年精英球员在不同日期以平衡顺序完成了两种热身方式(TWU和DWU)。在每个实验环节中,分别在(TWU或DWU后立即)、期间(30分钟)和模拟比赛60分钟后进行反向移动跳(CMJ)、20米短跑、网球发球速度和准确性测试。通过四因素(热身干预和时间)重复测量方差分析对测量结果进行比较。在所分析的所有变量中,整个时间段内热身(TWU和DWU)均有主效应。结果表明,与TWU方式相比,DWU方式在热身结束后以及30分钟比赛测试时,20米短跑时间显著更快、CMJ更高,网球发球速度更快且更准确(p<0.05;积极效应概率>75-99%)。在60分钟比赛测试时,任何变量(20米短跑除外)均未发现显著的组间差异。因此,本研究结果建议,为使这些精英网球运动员达到最佳表现,应在正式训练和比赛前采用DWU方式而非TWU方式。