Department of Dental Hygiene, Hanyang Womans University, Seoul 04763, Korea.
Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 21;18(3):914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030914.
This study examined the association of emotional labor and organizational climate with burnout and elucidated the moderating effect of organizational climate on the relationship between emotional labor and burnout among 18,936 Korean firefighters (male: 17,790, 93.9%, female: 1146, 6.1%). To examine the effects of organizational climate on the relationships between five sub-scales of emotional labor and burnout, four groups were created using various combinations of emotional labor ("normal" vs. "risk") and organizational climate ("good" vs. "bad"): (1) "normal" and "good" (Group I), (2) "normal" and "bad" (Group II), (3) "risk" and "good" (Group III), and (4) "risk" and "bad" (Group IV). A hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis indicated that firefighters' burnout was significantly higher in the group with "bad" than "good" organizational climate and was significantly higher among people with "risk" than "normal" emotional labor. Combined effects of organizational climate with emotional labor on burnout were observed in all five sub-scales. Groups II, III, and IV were more likely to experience burnout than Group I (trend < 0.001). Additionally, the moderating effects of organizational climate on the relationship between the five sub-scales of emotional labor and burnout were observed, except for factor 5. These results emphasize the importance of stress management to alleviate burnout caused by emotional labor at the organizational level and coping strategies to reinforce the personal potentiality suitable to organizational norms at the individual level.
这项研究考察了情绪劳动和组织氛围与倦怠的关系,并阐明了组织氛围对 18936 名韩国消防员(男性:17790 人,占 93.9%;女性:1146 人,占 6.1%)情绪劳动与倦怠之间关系的调节作用。为了检验组织氛围对情绪劳动五个子维度与倦怠之间关系的影响,根据情绪劳动(“正常”与“风险”)和组织氛围(“良好”与“不良”)的不同组合,将消防员分为四组:(1)“正常”和“良好”(组 I),(2)“正常”和“不良”(组 II),(3)“风险”和“良好”(组 III),(4)“风险”和“不良”(组 IV)。分层多元线性回归分析表明,组织氛围不良的消防员倦怠程度显著高于组织氛围良好的消防员,情绪劳动风险程度较高的消防员倦怠程度也显著高于情绪劳动正常的消防员。在所有五个子维度上,都观察到了组织氛围与情绪劳动对倦怠的综合影响。与组 I 相比,组 II、组 III 和组 IV 更有可能经历倦怠(趋势 < 0.001)。此外,还观察到了组织氛围对情绪劳动五个子维度与倦怠之间关系的调节作用,但因子 5 除外。这些结果强调了在组织层面上管理情绪劳动引起的倦怠和在个人层面上强化适合组织规范的个人潜力的应对策略的重要性。