Suppr超能文献

“在城市里,路程不远,但却要花很长时间”:比较尼日利亚拉各斯到达救命产科护理的估计和复制出行时间。

"In cities, it's not far, but it takes long": comparing estimated and replicated travel times to reach life-saving obstetric care in Lagos, Nigeria.

机构信息

LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

Centre for Reproductive Health Research and Innovation, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004318.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Travel time to comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC) facilities in low-resource settings is commonly estimated using modelling approaches. Our objective was to derive and compare estimates of travel time to reach CEmOC in an African megacity using models and web-based platforms against actual replication of travel.

METHODS

We extracted data from patient files of all 732 pregnant women who presented in emergency in the four publicly owned tertiary CEmOC facilities in Lagos, Nigeria, between August 2018 and August 2019. For a systematically selected subsample of 385, we estimated travel time from their homes to the facility using the cost-friction surface approach, Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) and Google Maps, and compared them to travel time by two independent drivers replicating women's journeys. We estimated the percentage of women who reached the facilities within 60 and 120 min.

RESULTS

The median travel time for 385 women from the cost-friction surface approach, OSRM and Google Maps was 5, 11 and 40 min, respectively. The median actual drive time was 50-52 min. The mean errors were >45 min for the cost-friction surface approach and OSRM, and 14 min for Google Maps. The smallest differences between replicated and estimated travel times were seen for night-time journeys at weekends; largest errors were found for night-time journeys at weekdays and journeys above 120 min. Modelled estimates indicated that all participants were within 60 min of the destination CEmOC facility, yet journey replication showed that only 57% were, and 92% were within 120 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing modelling methods underestimate actual travel time in low-resource megacities. Significant gaps in geographical access to life-saving health services like CEmOC must be urgently addressed, including in urban areas. Leveraging tools that generate 'closer-to-reality' estimates will be vital for service planning if universal health coverage targets are to be realised by 2030.

摘要

背景

在资源匮乏的环境中,前往综合性产科急救设施(CEmOC)的旅行时间通常通过建模方法进行估算。我们的目标是使用模型和基于网络的平台,与实际的行程复制相比,得出并比较在非洲特大城市中到达 CEmOC 的旅行时间的估计值。

方法

我们从 2018 年 8 月至 2019 年 8 月期间在尼日利亚拉各斯的四家公立三级 CEmOC 设施中急诊就诊的所有 732 名孕妇的病历中提取数据。对于系统选择的 385 名孕妇的子样本,我们使用成本摩擦面方法、开源路由机(OSRM)和谷歌地图估算从她们家到该设施的旅行时间,并将其与两名独立司机复制的女性行程的旅行时间进行比较。我们估计了在 60 分钟和 120 分钟内到达该设施的女性比例。

结果

385 名女性的成本摩擦面方法、OSRM 和谷歌地图的中位数旅行时间分别为 5 分钟、11 分钟和 40 分钟。实际驾驶时间的中位数为 50-52 分钟。对于成本摩擦面方法和 OSRM,平均误差大于 45 分钟,对于谷歌地图,平均误差为 14 分钟。在周末夜间旅行时,复制和估计的旅行时间之间的差异最小;在工作日夜间旅行和旅行时间超过 120 分钟时,误差最大。模型估计表明,所有参与者都在目的地 CEmOC 设施的 60 分钟内,但行程复制显示只有 57%的人在 60 分钟内,92%的人在 120 分钟内。

结论

现有的建模方法低估了资源匮乏的特大城市中的实际旅行时间。必须紧急解决像 CEmOC 这样的救命卫生服务在地理上可及性方面的重大差距,包括在城市地区。如果要在 2030 年前实现全民健康覆盖目标,那么利用能够产生“更接近现实”的估计值的工具对于服务规划至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ac0/7839900/e41d0e015e1d/bmjgh-2020-004318f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验