Department of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 26;16(1):e0245766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245766. eCollection 2021.
There is a relationship between pesticide exposure and farmworkers' health. Well-conducted evaluations can provide an insight into how to develop and implement more effective interventions to prevent farmers and farmworkers' exposure to pesticides. This review aimed to summarize the literature on the effectiveness of interventions to promote pesticide safety and reduce pesticide exposure among farmers and farmworkers.
A comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Agricola, NIOSHTIC, and Agris databases was performed to identify relevant studies published from 2000 to 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies assessing the effectiveness of interventions on a variety of outcomes related to pesticide exposure were considered. The searches were restricted to articles written in English. The methodological quality of included reviews was appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool (EPHPP).
The initial search led to 47912 records, 31 studies of which including nine RCTs and twenty-two quasi-experimental studies met the criteria. The majority of the included studies focused on the educational/ behavioral approach. The studies that applied this approach were effective in improving the participants' knowledge and attitude; however, these interventions were less effective in terms of making changes in participants' behaviors and their risk of exposure to toxic pesticides. Multifaceted interventions were moderately effective in terms of improving farmers' and farmworkers' behaviors and reduction in exposure to toxic pesticides. We did not find any studies that had evaluated the effectiveness of engineering/technological, and legislation/enforcement interventions.
Although the majority of studies were based on an educational/behavioral approach and did not assess the effect of interventions on objective measures, the results of this review highlight the significant effectiveness of educational programs and some potential key elements of these interventions. These findings may inform policymakers to develop interventions to reduce pesticide exposure among farmers and farmworkers.
农药接触与农场工人健康之间存在关联。精心设计的评估可以深入了解如何制定和实施更有效的干预措施,以防止农民和农场工人接触农药。本综述旨在总结有关促进农药安全和减少农民和农场工人接触农药的干预措施有效性的文献。
在 PubMed、Embase、ISI Web of Science、Scopus、Science Direct、Agricola、NIOSHTIC 和 Agris 数据库上全面检索,以确定 2000 年至 2019 年期间发表的相关研究。考虑了评估各种与农药接触相关结局的干预措施有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)和准实验研究。检索仅限于英文文章。使用有效公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具(EPHPP)评估纳入综述的方法学质量。
最初的检索得到 47912 条记录,其中 31 项研究(包括 9 项 RCT 和 22 项准实验研究)符合标准。大多数纳入的研究都集中在教育/行为方法上。应用这种方法的研究在提高参与者的知识和态度方面是有效的;然而,这些干预措施在改变参与者的行为及其接触有毒农药的风险方面效果较差。多方面的干预措施在改善农民和农场工人的行为和减少接触有毒农药方面是中等有效的。我们没有发现任何评估工程/技术和立法/执法干预措施有效性的研究。
尽管大多数研究都基于教育/行为方法,并且没有评估干预措施对客观测量的影响,但本综述的结果突出了教育计划的显著有效性和这些干预措施的一些潜在关键要素。这些发现可能为政策制定者提供信息,以制定减少农民和农场工人接触农药的干预措施。