• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育干预措施提高农业工人的安全和健康素养:系统评价。

Educational Interventions to Improve Safety and Health Literacy Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, College of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babes-Bolyai University, 400376 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Production Systems, 00790 Otaniemi, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 10;17(3):1114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031114.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17031114
PMID:32050565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7037762/
Abstract

Health and safety education for farmers has the potential to increase the level of health, safety literacy, and thereby improve farmers' health and quality of life. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the published literature documenting different educational interventions for agricultural workers that have the improvement of health and/or safety literacy as an outcome. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus and PsycINFO databases for articles focusing on educational interventions for farmers' health and safety. From the 3357 initial hits, 36 unduplicated records met the inclusion criteria. The articles included in the review used educational interventions for farmers with the purpose of preventing farm-induced diseases and injuries, increasing the health and well-being of farmers, and promoting good manufacturing practices. The educational approaches considered varied from lectures, videos, newsletters, games, and community fairs, to involving the community in designing the intervention and training farmers to deliver the intervention to the community. Interventions that used evidence-based theories, which took into account cultural aspects and individual factors, used biomarkers as a behavior change measurement, and involved the community in the development of the intervention had the best results in terms of behavior change. The strategies of educational interventions identified in this review that produced good results have the potential to inform future researchers and policy makers in the design and implementation of public health interventions, programs and policies to improve the health of farmers and their families.

摘要

农民的健康与安全教育培训可能会提高健康、安全素养水平,从而改善农民的健康和生活质量。本文旨在对已发表的文献进行系统回顾,这些文献记录了不同的农业工人教育干预措施,其结果是提高健康和/或安全素养。在 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 PsycINFO 数据库中,我们对关注农民健康和安全的教育干预措施的文章进行了系统性检索。从最初的 3357 个命中记录中,有 36 个重复记录符合纳入标准。本综述中包含的文章使用了针对农民的教育干预措施,目的是预防由农场引起的疾病和伤害,提高农民的健康和福祉,并促进良好生产规范。所考虑的教育方法从讲座、视频、通讯、游戏和社区集市,到让社区参与设计干预措施以及培训农民向社区提供干预措施,不一而足。在行为改变方面,使用基于证据的理论、考虑到文化方面和个体因素、使用生物标志物作为行为改变测量指标、以及让社区参与干预措施开发的干预措施效果最佳。本综述中确定的、产生良好效果的教育干预策略有可能为未来的研究人员和政策制定者在设计和实施公共卫生干预措施、方案和政策以改善农民及其家庭健康方面提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f100/7037762/075789325433/ijerph-17-01114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f100/7037762/075789325433/ijerph-17-01114-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f100/7037762/075789325433/ijerph-17-01114-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Educational Interventions to Improve Safety and Health Literacy Among Agricultural Workers: A Systematic Review.教育干预措施提高农业工人的安全和健康素养:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 10;17(3):1114. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031114.
2
A systematic review of farm safety interventions.农场安全干预措施的系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4 Suppl):51-62. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00141-0.
3
Farmer assessment of the certified safe farm program.农民对认证安全农场计划的评估。
J Agromedicine. 2007;12(3):33-43. doi: 10.1080/10599240801887827.
4
Effectiveness of interventions to promote pesticide safety and reduce pesticide exposure in agricultural health studies: A systematic review.干预措施在促进农业健康研究中的农药安全和减少农药暴露方面的有效性:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 26;16(1):e0245766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245766. eCollection 2021.
5
Model development for health promotion and control of agricultural occupational health hazards and accidents in Pathumthani, Thailand.泰国巴吞他尼府促进健康及控制农业职业健康危害与事故的模型开发
Ind Health. 2005 Oct;43(4):669-76. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.43.669.
6
Epilogue: agricultural occupational and environmental health policy strategies for the future.结语:未来农业职业与环境卫生政策策略
Am J Ind Med. 1990;18(4):523-6. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700180428.
7
Effectiveness of roll-over protective structures in reducing farm tractor fatalities.翻车保护结构在减少农用拖拉机死亡事故中的有效性。
Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4 Suppl):63-9. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00142-2.
8
Creating a safer and healthier agriculture--are we asking the right questions?打造更安全、更健康的农业——我们问对问题了吗?
J Agric Saf Health. 2003 May;9(2):87-9.
9
Needlestick Injuries in Agriculture Workers and Prevention Programs.农业工人的针刺伤及预防项目
J Agromedicine. 2016;21(1):82-90. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1106996.
10
Health and safety on the farm.农场的健康与安全。
BMJ. 1992 Jul 4;305(6844):6-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6844.6.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlations of health literacy with individuals' understanding and use of medications in Southern Taiwan.台湾南部地区健康素养与个人用药理解及用药情况的相关性
Open Med (Wars). 2025 Jul 8;20(1):20251203. doi: 10.1515/med-2025-1203. eCollection 2025.
2
Health Interventions for the Prevention of Dehydration in Agricultural Workers Exposed to Heat Stress: A Systematic Review.预防暴露于热应激环境下农业工人脱水的健康干预措施:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 23;13(11):1232. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111232.
3
Effect of Dairy Farm Supervisor Leadership Training on Workplace Safety Climate.

本文引用的文献

1
An Occupational Health Education Program for Thai Farmers Exposed to Chlorpyrifos.接触毒死蜱的泰国农民的职业健康教育计划。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2018 Oct;30(7):666-672. doi: 10.1177/1010539518806042. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
2
Effectiveness of occupational safety and health training for migrant farmworkers: a scoping review.农民工职业安全与健康培训效果评估:范围综述。
Public Health. 2018 Jul;160:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
3
Prospective evaluation of low health literacy and its impact on outcomes in trauma patients.
奶牛场主管领导力培训对工作场所安全氛围的影响。
Workplace Health Saf. 2025 May;73(5):227-235. doi: 10.1177/21650799241304458. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
4
Deconstruction of farm machine-related safety interventions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.农业机械相关安全干预措施的解构:一项系统综述与叙述性综合分析
Ann Work Expo Health. 2025 Mar 15;69(3):233-250. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae105.
5
Diets cannot be sustainable without ensuring the well-being of communities, workers and animals in food value chains.如果不能确保食物链中社区、工人和动物的福祉,饮食就不可能可持续。
Nat Food. 2024 Oct;5(10):818-824. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01048-0. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
6
Digital and Precision Technologies in Dairy Cattle Farming: A Bibliometric Analysis.奶牛养殖中的数字与精准技术:文献计量分析
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jun 20;14(12):1832. doi: 10.3390/ani14121832.
7
Attitudes towards zoonotic disease risk vary across sociodemographic, communication and health-related factors: A general population survey on literacy about zoonoses in the Netherlands.社会人口学、沟通及健康相关因素对人畜共患病风险的态度各异:荷兰一项关于人畜共患病知识的普通人群调查
One Health. 2024 Apr 8;18:100721. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100721. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Socio-demographic, agricultural, and personal protective factors in relation to health literacy among farmers from all regions of Thailand.泰国所有地区农民的社会人口统计学、农业和个人保护因素与健康素养的关系。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 25;12:1364296. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364296. eCollection 2024.
9
Navigating the Ethical and Methodological Dimensions of a Farm Safety Photovoice Project.探索农场安全影像纪实项目的伦理和方法论维度。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Jun;20(2):249-263. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10261-8. Epub 2023 May 23.
10
Adolescence is an opportunity for farm injury prevention: A call for better age-based data disaggregation.青春期是预防农业伤害的契机:呼吁更好地按年龄分类数据。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:1036657. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1036657. eCollection 2022.
前瞻性评估低健康素养及其对创伤患者结局的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):187-192. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001914.
4
A two-month follow-up evaluation testing interventions to limit the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistant bacteria among Maasai of northern Tanzania.一项为期两个月的随访评估,测试旨在限制坦桑尼亚北部马赛人中抗菌药物耐药菌的出现和传播的干预措施。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 15;17(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2857-z.
5
A Guide to the Design of Occupational Safety and Health Training for Immigrant, Latino/a Dairy Workers.移民拉丁裔奶农职业安全与健康培训设计指南
Front Public Health. 2016 Dec 23;4:282. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00282. eCollection 2016.
6
Pesticide Health and Safety Challenges Facing Informal Sector Workers: A Case of Small-scale Agricultural Workers in Tanzania.非正规部门工人面临的农药健康与安全挑战:以坦桑尼亚小规模农业工人为例。
New Solut. 2016 Aug;26(2):220-40. doi: 10.1177/1048291116650262.
7
Trauma health literacy: In need of remediation.创伤健康素养:亟待改善。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Dec;81(6):1167-1170. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001140.
8
Impact of Training Bolivian Farmers on Integrated Pest Management and Diffusion of Knowledge to Neighboring Farmers.培训玻利维亚农民对病虫害综合防治及知识向邻近农民传播的影响
J Agromedicine. 2016;21(2):200-8. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1143428.
9
Evaluating the effect of Focus Farms on Ontario dairy producers' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward control of Johne's disease.评估聚焦农场对安大略省奶农关于控制副结核的知识、态度和行为的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Aug;98(8):5222-40. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8765.
10
Culturally relevant model program to prevent and reduce agricultural injuries.预防和减少农业伤害的文化相关示范项目。
J Agric Saf Health. 2014 Jul;20(3):175-98. doi: 10.13031/jash.20.10333.