Suppr超能文献

重症监护情况下的风险偏好与决策制定

Risk preference and decision making in critical care situations.

作者信息

Nightingale S D, Grant M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cook County Hospital, Chicago.

出版信息

Chest. 1988 Apr;93(4):684-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.4.684.

Abstract

Physician attitudes towards risk may influence their behavior in critical care situations. To explore this hypothesis, physicians' responses to a questionnaire about risk were compared to their preferences towards "intubation" or "current therapy without intubation" for a hypothetical patient with end-stage lung disease, and to the length of time they performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation before they declared their efforts unsuccessful. When the choices on the questionnaire were framed in terms of loss, choice of the risky alternative was associated with greater preference for "intubation," and with longer duration of resuscitation efforts (both p less than .005). At least part of the variation in physician attitudes and practices towards the care of the critically or terminally ill is associated with measurable psychologic differences among individual physicians.

摘要

医生对风险的态度可能会影响他们在重症监护情况下的行为。为了探究这一假设,研究人员将医生对一份关于风险的问卷的回答,与他们对于一名患有终末期肺病的假设患者选择“插管”或“不插管的当前治疗”的偏好,以及他们在宣布心肺复苏努力失败之前进行心肺复苏的时长进行了比较。当问卷中的选择以损失来表述时,选择有风险的替代方案与对“插管”的更大偏好以及更长的复苏努力时长相关(两者p值均小于0.005)。医生对危重症或绝症患者护理的态度和做法的差异,至少有一部分与个体医生之间可测量的心理差异有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验