Eells T P, Pratt D S, Coppolo D P, Alpern H D, May J J
Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital, Cooperstown, N.Y. 13326.
Chest. 1988 Apr;93(4):727-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.4.727.
Cytologic examination of bronchial brush specimens is effective in diagnosing bronchogenic carcinoma. A major problem is loss of cells and cellular detail associated with the direct smear technique (DST). A more recent method, the Saccomanno brush wash (SBW), uses a narrow-mouthed vial to scrape cells off the brush directly into fixative. We sampled 12 directly visualized airway tumors using standard brush technique. The same brush was then agitated in a SBW vial, which was centrifuged, the cell pellet being smeared over a predetermined area of a slide. Designated areas of each slide were counted and total malignant cells per slide extrapolated. DST slides had significantly fewer cells than SBW slides, and cellular detail was better with SBW in seven cases, DST in one case, and equal in four cases. SBW appears preferable for handling of bronchial brush specimens.
支气管刷检标本的细胞学检查对支气管源性癌的诊断很有效。一个主要问题是与直接涂片技术(DST)相关的细胞和细胞细节的丢失。一种更新的方法,即萨科曼诺刷洗液(SBW),使用一个窄口小瓶将刷头上的细胞直接刮入固定剂中。我们使用标准刷检技术对12个直接可视化的气道肿瘤进行采样。然后将同一把刷子在SBW小瓶中搅动,小瓶离心后,将细胞沉淀涂抹在载玻片的预定区域上。对每张载玻片的指定区域进行计数,并推算出每张载玻片上的恶性细胞总数。DST载玻片上的细胞明显少于SBW载玻片,细胞细节在7例中SBW更好,1例中DST更好,4例中两者相等。SBW似乎更适合处理支气管刷检标本。