• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

20世纪90年代至2010年代间拉丁美洲国家母乳喂养和婴儿配方奶粉方面的社会不平等趋势。

Trends in social inequalities in breastfeeding and infant formulas in Latin American countries between the 1990 and 2010 decades.

作者信息

Ferreira Camila S, Azeredo Catarina M, Rinaldi Ana Elisa M

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia. Av. Pará, Bloco 2u, 1720 - Umuarama, Uberlândia, MG38400-902, Brazil.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2021 Nov;24(16):5471-5480. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000392. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980021000392
PMID:33500006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10195538/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse trends of social inequality in breastfeeding and infant formula (IF) use in Latin America between 1990 and 2010 decades.

DESIGN

Time-series cross-sectional study with data from Demographic and Health Surveys. We described the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), breastfeeding between 6 and 12 months (BF6-12) and IF for infants under 6 months (IF < 6) and between 6 and 12 months (IF6-12). Social inequalities were assessed using the slope index of inequality (SII) and concentration index (CIX). Trends in the prevalence of breastfeeding, IF and index of social inequality were analysed by a linear regression model with weighted least squares variance.

SETTING

Bolivia, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Haiti and Peru.

PARTICIPANTS

51·358 alive infants younger than 12 months.

RESULTS

Five countries showed an increasing trend for EBF and BF6-12, four increased for IF < 6 and six for IF6-12. Simultaneous decrease in IF < 6 (Colombia: -0·3/year; Haiti: -0·02/year) and increase in EBF (Colombia: +2·0/year; Haiti: +1·9/year) were observed only in two countries. EBF prevalence was high in the lowest income quintiles in five countries, and IF prevalence was high in the highest income quintiles in all countries and over the decades. For BF6-12, a decrease in inequality (prevalence increased in the highest quintile) was observed in Guatemala (SII1995 = -0·42; SII2015 = -0·28) and the Dominican Republic (SII1996 = -0·54; SII2013 = -0·26). Guatemala was the only country showing a decrease in inequality for BF (SII = -0·005; CIX = -0·0035) and an increase for IF (SII = 0·022; CIX = 0·01).

CONCLUSIONS

The inequality in BF and IF remained over time. However, inequality in IF < 6 has decreased because low-income infants have increased use and high-income infants have decreased.

摘要

目的

分析1990年至2010年这几十年间拉丁美洲母乳喂养和婴儿配方奶粉(IF)使用方面的社会不平等趋势。

设计

利用人口与健康调查数据进行的时间序列横断面研究。我们描述了纯母乳喂养(EBF)、6至12个月母乳喂养(BF6 - 12)以及6个月以下婴儿(IF < 6)和6至12个月婴儿(IF6 - 12)使用婴儿配方奶粉的患病率。使用不平等斜率指数(SII)和集中指数(CIX)评估社会不平等。通过加权最小二乘方差线性回归模型分析母乳喂养、婴儿配方奶粉使用情况及社会不平等指数的趋势。

背景

玻利维亚、哥伦比亚、多米尼加共和国、危地马拉、海地和秘鲁。

参与者

51358名12个月以下的存活婴儿。

结果

五个国家的纯母乳喂养和6至12个月母乳喂养呈上升趋势,四个国家6个月以下婴儿配方奶粉使用增加,六个国家6至12个月婴儿配方奶粉使用增加。仅在两个国家观察到6个月以下婴儿配方奶粉使用量同时下降(哥伦比亚:-0.3/年;海地:-0.02/年)以及纯母乳喂养增加(哥伦比亚:+2.0/年;海地:+1.9/年)。在五个国家中,最低收入五分位数人群的纯母乳喂养患病率较高,在所有国家以及这几十年间最高收入五分位数人群的婴儿配方奶粉使用率较高。对于6至12个月母乳喂养,危地马拉(SII1995 = -0.42;SII2015 = -0.28)和多米尼加共和国(SII1996 = -0.54;SII2013 = -0.2)观察到不平等程度下降(最高五分位数患病率增加)。危地马拉是唯一一个母乳喂养不平等程度下降(SII = -0.005;CIX = -0.0035)且婴儿配方奶粉使用不平等程度增加(SII = 0.022;CIX = 0.01)的国家。

结论

母乳喂养和婴儿配方奶粉使用方面的不平等现象长期存在。然而,6个月以下婴儿配方奶粉使用的不平等程度有所下降,因为低收入婴儿使用量增加而高收入婴儿使用量减少。

相似文献

1
Trends in social inequalities in breastfeeding and infant formulas in Latin American countries between the 1990 and 2010 decades.20世纪90年代至2010年代间拉丁美洲国家母乳喂养和婴儿配方奶粉方面的社会不平等趋势。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Nov;24(16):5471-5480. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000392. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Evolution of breastfeeding indicators and early introduction of foods in Latin American and Caribbean countries in the decades of 1990, 2000 and 2010.20 世纪 90 年代、2000 年代和 2010 年代拉丁美洲和加勒比国家母乳喂养指标和早期食物引入的演变。
Int Breastfeed J. 2022 Apr 22;17(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13006-022-00477-6.
3
Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in stunting prevalence in Latin America and the Caribbean countries: differences between quintiles and deciles.拉丁美洲和加勒比国家发育迟缓流行率的社会经济不平等趋势:五分位组和十分位组之间的差异。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 15;18(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1046-7.
4
Association Between Maternal Work and Exclusive Breastfeeding in Countries of Latin America and Caribbean.拉美和加勒比地区国家中母亲工作与纯母乳喂养之间的关联。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Jul;26(7):1496-1506. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03390-w. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
Delivery channels and socioeconomic inequalities in coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions: analysis of 36 cross-sectional surveys in low-income and middle-income countries.生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的提供渠道和社会经济不平等:对低收入和中等收入国家的 36 项横断面调查的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Aug;9(8):e1101-e1109. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00204-7. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
Socioeconomic inequality in exclusive breastfeeding behavior and ideation factors for social behavioral change in three north-western Nigerian states: a cross-sectional study.在尼日利亚西北部三个州,社会经济不平等与纯母乳喂养行为和社会行为改变观念因素的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 27;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01504-4.
7
Infant feeding practices in three Latin American countries in three decades: what demographic, health, and economic factors are relevant?三个拉丁美洲国家三十年来的婴儿喂养方式:哪些人口、健康和经济因素与之相关?
Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 4;10:1239503. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1239503. eCollection 2023.
8
Progress in reducing inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn,' and child health in Latin America and the Caribbean: an unfinished agenda.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区在减少生殖、孕产妇、新生儿及儿童健康方面不平等现象上取得的进展:一项未完成的议程。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2015 Jul;38(1):9-16.
9
Rates and time trends in the consumption of breastmilk, formula, and animal milk by children younger than 2 years from 2000 to 2019: analysis of 113 countries.2000 年至 2019 年期间,2 岁以下儿童母乳喂养、配方奶和动物奶的消费率和时间趋势:113 个国家的分析。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021 Sep;5(9):619-630. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00163-2. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
10
Sociodemographic, health and pro-breast-feeding policies and programmes associated with breast-feeding duration in Latin American countries.社会人口统计学、健康状况以及与拉美国家母乳喂养持续时间相关的促进母乳喂养政策和方案。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(15):4985-4996. doi: 10.1017/S1368980020005145. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Enteral Infant Formulas: A Narrative Review of Historical Evolution, Nutritional Composition, and Clinical Use in Pediatrics.婴儿肠内配方奶粉:历史沿革、营养成分及儿科临床应用的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2025 Apr 21;17(4):e82692. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82692. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Why do mothers mix milk feed their infants? Results from a systematic review.母亲为何要混合奶来喂养婴儿?系统综述的结果。
Nutr Rev. 2024 Oct 1;82(10):1355-1371. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad134.
3
Infant feeding practices in three Latin American countries in three decades: what demographic, health, and economic factors are relevant?三个拉丁美洲国家三十年来的婴儿喂养方式:哪些人口、健康和经济因素与之相关?
Front Nutr. 2023 Oct 4;10:1239503. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1239503. eCollection 2023.
4
Socio-economic inequalities in the effect of public policies and the COVID-19 pandemic on exclusive breastfeeding in Chile.智利公共政策和 COVID-19 大流行对纯母乳喂养影响的社会经济不平等。
Public Health. 2023 Jan;214:61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Infant Formula Consumption Is Positively Correlated with Wealth, Within and Between Countries: A Multi-Country Study.婴儿配方奶粉的消费与国家内部和国家之间的财富呈正相关:一项多国研究。
J Nutr. 2020 Apr 1;150(4):910-917. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz327.
2
The World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative: Implementation of the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding in 84 countries.世界母乳喂养趋势倡议:84 个国家实施婴幼儿喂养全球战略。
J Public Health Policy. 2019 Mar;40(1):35-65. doi: 10.1057/s41271-018-0153-9.
3
The World Health Organization Code and exclusive breastfeeding in China, India, and Vietnam.世界卫生组织准则与中、印、越三国的纯母乳喂养
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jan;15(1):e12685. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12685. Epub 2018 Sep 30.
4
Breastfeeding as a public health responsibility: a review of the evidence.母乳喂养作为公共卫生责任:证据回顾。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;30(6):759-770. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12496. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Considering Inequities in Breastfeeding.审视母乳喂养中的不平等现象。
J Hum Lact. 2017 May;33(2):248-249. doi: 10.1177/0890334417699164. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
6
Global trends and patterns of commercial milk-based formula sales: is an unprecedented infant and young child feeding transition underway?全球基于牛奶的商业配方奶粉销售趋势和模式:婴幼儿喂养方式正在经历前所未有的转变吗?
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(14):2540-50. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001117. Epub 2016 May 23.
7
Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?为何要投资,以及需要采取哪些措施来改善母乳喂养做法?
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):491-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2.
8
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.21 世纪的母乳喂养:流行病学、机制和终身效应。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7.
9
Inequities in milk-based prelacteal feedings in Latin America and the Caribbean: the role of cesarean section delivery.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区基于牛奶的产前喂养中的不平等现象:剖宫产分娩的作用。
J Hum Lact. 2015 Feb;31(1):89-98. doi: 10.1177/0890334414559074. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Measuring coverage in MNCH: determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions.测量母婴、新生儿和儿童健康干预措施的覆盖情况:确定和解释覆盖不平等。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001390. Epub 2013 May 7.