Suppr超能文献

共同设计组织改进和干预措施,以提高英格兰四家卒中病房的住院患者活动量:使用常规过程理论的混合方法过程评估。

Co-designing organisational improvements and interventions to increase inpatient activity in four stroke units in England: a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory.

机构信息

Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds, UK

Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):e042723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042723.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore facilitators and barriers to using experience-based co-design (EBCD) and accelerated EBCD (AEBCD) in the development and implementation of interventions to increase activity opportunities for inpatient stroke survivors.

DESIGN

Mixed-methods process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory (NPT).

SETTING

Four post-acute rehabilitation stroke units in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Stroke survivors, family members, stroke unit staff, hospital managers, support staff and volunteers. Data informing our NPT analysis comprised: ethnographic observations, n=366 hours; semistructured interviews with 76 staff, 53 stroke survivors and 27 family members pre-EBCD/AEBCD implementation or post-EBCD/AEBCD implementation; and observation of 43 co-design meetings involving 23 stroke survivors, 21 family carers and 54 staff.

RESULTS

Former patients and families valued participation in EBCD/AEBCD perceiving they were equal partners in co-design. Staff engaged with EBCD/AEBCD, reporting it as a valuable improvement approach leading to increased activity opportunities. The structured EBCD/AEBCD approach was influential in enabling coherence and cognitive participation and legitimated staff involvement in the change process. Researcher facilitation of EBCD/AEBCD supported cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring; these were important in implementing and sustaining co-design activities. Observations and interviews post-EBCD/AEBCD cycles confirmed creation and use of new social spaces and increased activity opportunities in all units. EBCD/AEBCD facilitated engagement with wider hospital resources and local communities, further enhancing activity opportunities. However, outside of structured group activity, many individual staff-patient interactions remained task focused.

CONCLUSIONS

EBCD/AEBCD facilitated the development and implementation of environmental changes and revisions to work routines which supported increased activity opportunities in stroke units providing post-acute and rehabilitation care. Former stroke patients and carers contributed to improvements. NPT's generative mechanisms were instrumental in analysis and interpretation of facilitators and barriers at the individual, group and organisational level, and can help inform future implementations of similar approaches.

摘要

目的

探索在开发和实施增加住院脑卒中幸存者活动机会的干预措施中使用基于经验的共同设计(EBCD)和加速 EBCD(AEBCD)的促进因素和障碍。

设计

以规范化进程理论(NPT)为基础的混合方法过程评估。

设置

英格兰的四个急性后康复脑卒中病房。

参与者

脑卒中幸存者、家庭成员、脑卒中病房工作人员、医院管理人员、支持人员和志愿者。为我们的 NPT 分析提供信息的数据包括:人种学观察,n=366 小时;在 EBCD/AEBCD 实施之前或之后,对 76 名工作人员、53 名脑卒中幸存者和 27 名家庭成员进行半结构化访谈;以及对 43 次共同设计会议进行观察,涉及 23 名脑卒中幸存者、21 名家庭照顾者和 54 名工作人员。

结果

前患者和家属重视参与 EBCD/AEBCD,认为他们是共同设计的平等伙伴。工作人员参与 EBCD/AEBCD,认为这是一种有价值的改进方法,导致活动机会增加。结构化的 EBCD/AEBCD 方法在实现一致性和认知参与以及使工作人员参与变革过程合法化方面具有影响力。EBCD/AEBCD 的研究人员促进支持了认知参与、集体行动和反思性监测;这些对于实施和维持共同设计活动非常重要。EBCD/AEBCD 循环后的观察和访谈证实,所有单位都创建和使用了新的社会空间,并增加了活动机会。EBCD/AEBCD 促进了与更广泛的医院资源和当地社区的合作,进一步增加了活动机会。然而,在结构化的小组活动之外,许多员工与患者的互动仍然以任务为中心。

结论

EBCD/AEBCD 促进了环境变化的发展和实施,以及工作常规的修订,这支持了急性后和康复护理脑卒中病房活动机会的增加。前脑卒中患者和照顾者为改进做出了贡献。NPT 的生成机制在个人、小组和组织层面上对促进因素和障碍的分析和解释具有重要作用,并可以为未来类似方法的实施提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cec7/7839845/e4a843943f11/bmjopen-2020-042723f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验