• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰强化社区护理服务改进的基于体验的协同设计过程的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究

Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

O'Donoghue Fay, O'Donnell Máire T, Griffin Tomás P, Fahy Eileen, Newell Elaine, Creaven Ann-Marie

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70206. doi: 10.1111/hex.70206.

DOI:10.1111/hex.70206
PMID:40072255
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11898217/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) is a popular collaborative process where service users and healthcare providers share their experiences of using and delivering services to identify ways to adapt services to enhance those experiences.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify enablers and barriers to the successful implementation of EBCD as part of Ireland's recently adopted Enhanced Community Care (ECC) programme.

DESIGN

Service users and staff at two sites (N = 17) participated in an accelerated EBCD process designed to enhance service provision for older people and those living with chronic conditions. This included four co-design working group sessions per site.

METHODS

Transcripts from the co-design working groups and from brief follow-up interviews with individual participants were analysed. Thematic analysis was used to identify enablers and barriers to the EBCD process.

RESULTS

We generated six key themes reflecting barriers and enablers; enablers were the fundamental role of the facilitator (Theme 1), a flexible approach that met group members' needs (Theme 2) and active and interactive activities to support participant engagement (Theme 3). The fundamental role of the facilitator was also identified as a barrier (Theme 4); additional barriers included balancing experience-sharing and decompressing (Theme 5) and the scope of the group as an invisible barrier (Theme 6), which reflected challenges in facilitating dialogue about change when participants were aware of system-level constraints on the potential for change.

CONCLUSIONS

The facilitator is critical in ensuring the successful implementation of the EBCD process. Considering how best to draw on the facilitator strengths while also ensuring that the service user perspectives are equally weighted with staff perspectives is important for effective communication within EBCD projects.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Service users (also including carers) at two sites participated in EBCD projects alongside health and social care professionals, ultimately generating two service improvements for the ECC programme. The participation of these service users was celebrated at an academic conference, which was attended by a number of service users, and where the outcomes of the EBCD project were presented.

摘要

背景

基于经验的协同设计(EBCD)是一种流行的协作过程,服务使用者和医疗保健提供者分享他们使用和提供服务的经验,以确定调整服务的方法来提升这些体验。

目的

本研究旨在确定作为爱尔兰最近采用的强化社区护理(ECC)计划一部分的EBCD成功实施的促进因素和障碍。

设计

两个地点的服务使用者和工作人员(N = 17)参与了一个加速的EBCD过程,旨在改善为老年人和慢性病患者提供的服务。这包括每个地点举行四次协同设计工作组会议。

方法

对协同设计工作组的记录以及对个别参与者的简短后续访谈进行了分析。采用主题分析法确定EBCD过程的促进因素和障碍。

结果

我们生成了六个反映障碍和促进因素的关键主题;促进因素包括协调员的基本作用(主题1)、满足小组成员需求的灵活方法(主题2)以及支持参与者参与的积极互动活动(主题3)。协调员的基本作用也被确定为一个障碍(主题4);其他障碍包括平衡经验分享和减压(主题5)以及小组范围作为一个无形障碍(主题6),这反映了当参与者意识到系统层面的变革潜力限制时,在促进关于变革的对话方面所面临的挑战。

结论

协调员对于确保EBCD过程的成功实施至关重要。考虑如何最好地利用协调员的优势,同时确保服务使用者的观点与工作人员的观点得到同等重视,对于EBCD项目中的有效沟通很重要。

患者或公众贡献

两个地点的服务使用者(也包括护理人员)与健康和社会护理专业人员一起参与了EBCD项目,最终为ECC计划带来了两项服务改进。这些服务使用者的参与在一次学术会议上得到了认可,许多服务使用者参加了该会议,会上展示了EBCD项目的成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f6/11898217/ebf5acfa06a0/HEX-28-e70206-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f6/11898217/19c93c8544a1/HEX-28-e70206-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f6/11898217/ebf5acfa06a0/HEX-28-e70206-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f6/11898217/19c93c8544a1/HEX-28-e70206-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57f6/11898217/ebf5acfa06a0/HEX-28-e70206-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Enablers and Barriers to an Experience-Based Co-Design Process to Develop Service Improvements in Enhanced Community Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study.爱尔兰强化社区护理服务改进的基于体验的协同设计过程的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70206. doi: 10.1111/hex.70206.
2
Understanding and using experiences of social care to guide service improvements: translating a co-design approach from health to social care.理解和利用社会关怀经验指导服务改进:将共同设计方法从卫生领域转化到社会关怀领域。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(27):1-84. doi: 10.3310/MYHT8970.
3
Co-designing a Physical Activity Service for Refugees and Asylum Seekers Using an Experience-Based Co-design Framework.基于经验的共同设计框架为难民和寻求庇护者设计一项身体活动服务。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Aug;26(4):674-688. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01587-5. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
4
Exploring the implementation of national health and social care standards in Ireland: A qualitative descriptive study.探索爱尔兰国家卫生与社会护理标准的实施情况:一项定性描述性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1489-1504. doi: 10.1111/jan.16346. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
5
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
6
Improving mental health service users' with medical co-morbidity transition between tertiary medical hospital and primary care services: a qualitative study.改善患有合并症的精神卫生服务使用者在三级医院和基层医疗服务之间的转诊:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 26;16:302. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1567-3.
7
Qualitative Exploration of Speech Pathologists' Experiences and Priorities for Aphasia Service Design: Initial Stage of an Experience-Based Co-Design Project to Improve Aphasia Services.定性探索言语治疗师在失语症服务设计方面的经验和重点:基于经验的共同设计项目改善失语症服务的初始阶段。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14105. doi: 10.1111/hex.14105.
8
Co-designing organisational improvements and interventions to increase inpatient activity in four stroke units in England: a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory.共同设计组织改进和干预措施,以提高英格兰四家卒中病房的住院患者活动量:使用常规过程理论的混合方法过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):e042723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042723.
9
'It opened my eyes, my ears, and my heart': Codesigning a substance use disorder treatment programme.“它打开了我的眼睛、耳朵和心扉”:共同设计一种物质使用障碍治疗方案。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13908. doi: 10.1111/hex.13908. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
10
Experience-based co-design in an adult psychological therapies service.成人心理治疗服务中的体验式协同设计
J Ment Health. 2016;25(1):36-40. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2015.1101423. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving heart failure care with an Experience-Based Co-Design approach: what matters to persons with heart failure and their family members?采用基于经验的共同设计方法改善心力衰竭护理:心力衰竭患者及其家庭成员关心的是什么?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 28;23(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09306-w.
2
Patient participation in priority setting: Co-existing participant roles.患者参与优先级设定:共存的参与者角色。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;294:114713. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114713. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
3
Using experience-based co-design with patients, carers and healthcare professionals to develop theory-based interventions for safer medicines use.
运用基于经验的患者、照护者和医疗保健专业人员共同设计,开发基于理论的干预措施,以提高安全用药水平。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Dec;17(12):2127-2135. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.004. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
4
Experiences From a Coaching Program for Parents of Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Developed Through Experienced-Based Co-Design (EBCD).基于经验的协同设计(EBCD)开发的针对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年家长的指导项目经验
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1181-1188. doi: 10.1177/2374373520969005. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Improving the experience of older people with colorectal and breast cancer in patient-centred cancer care pathways using experience-based co-design.运用基于经验的共同设计改善以患者为中心的癌症护理路径中老年人的结直肠癌和乳腺癌体验。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):478-490. doi: 10.1111/hex.13189. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
6
The Social Ecology of Power in Participatory Health Research.权力的参与式健康研究社会生态学。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Mar;31(4):778-788. doi: 10.1177/1049732320979187. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
7
Comparative effectiveness of external vs blended facilitation on collaborative care model implementation in slow-implementer community practices.外部与混合促进对社区实践中缓慢实施合作护理模式的比较效果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):954-965. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13583. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
8
External facilitators' perceptions of internal facilitation skills during implementation of collaborative care for mental health teams: a qualitative analysis informed by the i-PARIHS framework.外部促进者对精神卫生团队实施协作式护理过程中内部促进技能的看法:基于 i-PARIHS 框架的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5011-3.
9
Experience-based co-design-Adapting the method for a researcher-initiated study in a multi-site setting.基于经验的共同设计——在多地点环境中对研究者发起的研究进行方法调整。
Health Expect. 2020 Jun;23(3):562-570. doi: 10.1111/hex.13028. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
10
Use and reporting of experience-based codesign studies in the healthcare setting: a systematic review.在医疗保健环境中使用和报告基于经验的共同设计研究:系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):64-76. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009570. Epub 2019 Sep 23.