• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计集体决策过程中被忽视的部分。

The Neglected Pieces of Designing Collective Decision-Making Processes.

作者信息

Khaluf Yara, Simoens Pieter, Hamann Heiko

机构信息

IDLab, Ghent University-Imec, Ghent, Belgium.

Institute of Computer Engineering, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2019 Mar 26;6:16. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00016. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2019.00016
PMID:33501032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7805907/
Abstract

Autonomous decision-making is a fundamental requirement for the intelligent behavior of individual agents and systems. For artificial systems, one of the key design prerequisites is providing the system with the ability to make proper decisions. Current literature on collective artificial systems designs decision-making mechanisms inspired mostly by the successful natural systems. Nevertheless, most of the approaches focus on voting mechanisms and miss other fundamental aspects. In this paper, we aim to draw attention to the missed pieces for the design of efficient collective decision-making, mainly information processes in its two types of stimuli and options set.

摘要

自主决策是个体智能体和系统智能行为的基本要求。对于人工系统而言,关键设计前提之一是赋予系统做出恰当决策的能力。当前关于集体人工系统的文献主要借鉴成功的自然系统来设计决策机制。然而,大多数方法聚焦于投票机制,而忽略了其他基本方面。在本文中,我们旨在提请注意高效集体决策设计中被遗漏的部分,主要是其两种刺激类型和选项集方面的信息过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d82/7805907/3edc3e4190f5/frobt-06-00016-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d82/7805907/3edc3e4190f5/frobt-06-00016-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d82/7805907/3edc3e4190f5/frobt-06-00016-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Neglected Pieces of Designing Collective Decision-Making Processes.设计集体决策过程中被忽视的部分。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Mar 26;6:16. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00016. eCollection 2019.
2
Artificial Collective Intelligence Engineering: A Survey of Concepts and Perspectives.人工集体智能工程:概念与视角综述。
Artif Life. 2023 Nov 1;29(4):433-467. doi: 10.1162/artl_a_00408.
3
Multiscale modelling and analysis of collective decision making in swarm robotics.群体机器人中集体决策的多尺度建模与分析
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 4;9(11):e111542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111542. eCollection 2014.
4
Beyond Bio-Inspired Robotics: How Multi-Robot Systems Can Support Research on Collective Animal Behavior.超越仿生机器人学:多机器人系统如何支持对动物群体行为的研究
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jun 20;9:865414. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.865414. eCollection 2022.
5
Ethics of Autonomous Collective Decision-Making: The CAESAR Framework.自主集体决策的伦理:CAESAR 框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Nov 25;28(6):61. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00414-0.
6
Synthetic collective intelligence.合成集体智能
Biosystems. 2016 Oct;148:47-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
7
From animal collective behaviors to swarm robotic cooperation.从动物集体行为到群体机器人协作。
Natl Sci Rev. 2023 Feb 16;10(5):nwad040. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwad040. eCollection 2023 May.
8
Collective decision making by rational individuals.理性个体的集体决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):E10387-E10396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811964115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Social integration of robots into groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choices.将机器人融入蟑螂群体以控制自组织选择。
Science. 2007 Nov 16;318(5853):1155-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1144259.
10
How simple autonomous decisions evolve into robust behaviours? A review from neurorobotics, cognitive, self-organized and artificial immune systems fields.简单的自主决策如何演变成稳健的行为?来自神经机器人学、认知、自组织和人工免疫系统领域的综述。
Biosystems. 2014 Oct;124:7-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning from humans to build social cognition among robots.向人类学习以在机器人之间建立社会认知。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Feb 6;10:1030416. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1030416. eCollection 2023.
2
Adaptive Foraging in Dynamic Environments Using Scale-Free Interaction Networks.利用无标度相互作用网络在动态环境中的适应性觅食
Front Robot AI. 2020 Jul 9;7:86. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00086. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical physics of liquid brains.液体大脑的统计物理学。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 10;374(1774):20180376. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0376.
2
The influence of the few: a stable 'oligarchy' controls information flow in house-hunting ants.少数派的影响:稳定的“寡头统治”控制着寻家蚂蚁的信息流。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Feb 14;285(1872). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2726.
3
Locating Order-Disorder Phase Transition in a Cardiac System.定位心脏系统中的有序-无序相变。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 31;8(1):1967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20109-6.
4
Scale invariance in natural and artificial collective systems: a review.自然和人工集体系统中的标度不变性:综述。
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Nov;14(136). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0662.
5
The Psychology of Superorganisms: Collective Decision Making by Insect Societies.超个体心理学:昆虫社会的集体决策。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2018 Jan 7;63:259-275. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-020117-043249. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
6
Quality versus quantity: Foraging decisions in the honeybee () feeding on wildflower nectar and fruit juice.质量与数量:以野花花蜜和果汁为食的蜜蜂的觅食决策
Ecol Evol. 2016 Sep 20;6(19):7156-7165. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2478. eCollection 2016 Oct.
7
Model of the best-of-N nest-site selection process in honeybees.蜜蜂最优 N 巢址选择过程模型。
Phys Rev E. 2017 May;95(5-1):052411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.052411. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Small-world bias of correlation networks: From brain to climate.相关网络的小世界偏差:从大脑到气候
Chaos. 2017 Mar;27(3):035812. doi: 10.1063/1.4977951.
9
Variability in individual assessment behaviour and its implications for collective decision-making.个体评估行为的变异性及其对集体决策的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 8;284(1848). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2237.
10
Optimal search patterns in honeybee orientation flights are robust against emerging infectious diseases.最优的蜜蜂定向飞行搜索模式对新发传染病具有鲁棒性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 12;6:32612. doi: 10.1038/srep32612.