• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人能识破你在说谎吗?一种用于在互动过程中检测谎言的机器学习系统。

Can a Robot Catch You Lying? A Machine Learning System to Detect Lies During Interactions.

作者信息

Gonzalez-Billandon Jonas, Aroyo Alexander M, Tonelli Alessia, Pasquali Dario, Sciutti Alessandra, Gori Monica, Sandini Giulio, Rea Francesco

机构信息

RBCS, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genova, Italy.

DIBRIS, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2019 Jul 31;6:64. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2019.00064
PMID:33501079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7805987/
Abstract

Deception is a complex social skill present in human interactions. Many social professions such as teachers, therapists and law enforcement officers leverage on deception detection techniques to support their work activities. Robots with the ability to autonomously detect deception could provide an important aid to human-human and human-robot interactions. The objective of this work is to demonstrate the possibility to develop a lie detection system that could be implemented on robots. To this goal, we focus on human and human robot interaction to understand if there is a difference in the behavior of the participants when lying to a robot or to a human. Participants were shown short movies of robberies and then interrogated by a human and by a humanoid robot "detectives." According to the instructions, subjects provided veridical responses to half of the question and false replies to the other half. Behavioral variables such as eye movements, time to respond and eloquence were measured during the task, while personality traits were assessed before experiment initiation. Participant's behavior showed strong similarities during the interaction with the human and the humanoid. Moreover, the behavioral features were used to train and test a lie detection algorithm. The results show that the selected behavioral variables are valid markers of deception both in human-human and in human-robot interactions and could be exploited to effectively enable robots to detect lies.

摘要

欺骗是人类互动中存在的一种复杂社交技能。许多社会职业,如教师、治疗师和执法人员,都利用欺骗检测技术来支持他们的工作活动。具备自主检测欺骗能力的机器人可以为人类之间以及人机交互提供重要帮助。这项工作的目标是证明开发一种可在机器人上实现的测谎系统的可能性。为了实现这一目标,我们专注于人与机器人的交互,以了解参与者在对机器人或对人说谎时的行为是否存在差异。向参与者展示抢劫的短片,然后由一名人类和一个类人机器人“侦探”进行询问。根据指示,受试者对一半问题给出真实回答,对另一半问题给出虚假回答。在任务过程中测量了诸如眼球运动、反应时间和口才等行为变量,同时在实验开始前评估了个性特征。参与者在与人类和类人机器人互动时的行为表现出强烈的相似性。此外,这些行为特征被用于训练和测试一种测谎算法。结果表明,所选的行为变量在人与人以及人机交互中都是欺骗的有效指标,并且可以被利用来有效地使机器人能够检测谎言。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4b/7805987/553bdd953132/frobt-06-00064-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4b/7805987/b5afdd692ae2/frobt-06-00064-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4b/7805987/168470cb290b/frobt-06-00064-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4b/7805987/553bdd953132/frobt-06-00064-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4b/7805987/b5afdd692ae2/frobt-06-00064-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4b/7805987/168470cb290b/frobt-06-00064-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4b/7805987/553bdd953132/frobt-06-00064-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Can a Robot Catch You Lying? A Machine Learning System to Detect Lies During Interactions.机器人能识破你在说谎吗?一种用于在互动过程中检测谎言的机器学习系统。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Jul 31;6:64. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.
2
Can a Robot Lie? Exploring the Folk Concept of Lying as Applied to Artificial Agents.机器人会说谎吗?探索应用于人工智能的说谎民间概念。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Oct;45(10):e13032. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13032.
3
Robot Gaze Behavior Affects Honesty in Human-Robot Interaction.机器人注视行为会影响人机交互中的诚实度。
Front Artif Intell. 2021 May 11;4:663190. doi: 10.3389/frai.2021.663190. eCollection 2021.
4
Human perceptions of social robot deception behaviors: an exploratory analysis.人类对社交机器人欺骗行为的认知:一项探索性分析。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Sep 5;11:1409712. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1409712. eCollection 2024.
5
Human-robot creative interactions: Exploring creativity in artificial agents using a storytelling game.人机创造性互动:通过一款讲故事游戏探索人工智能体中的创造力。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Aug 24;9:695162. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.695162. eCollection 2022.
6
"You can't kid a kidder": association between production and detection of deception in an interactive deception task.“别想骗骗术高手”:交互式欺骗任务中欺骗行为的产生与察觉之间的关联
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 17;6:87. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00087. eCollection 2012.
7
Anthropomorphism of Robots: Study of Appearance and Agency.机器人拟人化:外观与能动性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 May 10;6(2):e12629. doi: 10.2196/12629.
8
Educators' Views on Using Humanoid Robots With Autistic Learners in Special Education Settings in England.英国教育工作者对在特殊教育环境中与自闭症学习者使用类人机器人的看法。
Front Robot AI. 2019 Nov 1;6:107. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00107. eCollection 2019.
9
Deceptively simple … The "deception-general" ability and the need to put the liar under the spotlight.极具欺骗性的简单……“欺骗一般”的能力和将说谎者置于聚光灯下的需要。
Front Neurosci. 2013 Aug 29;7:152. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00152.
10
The effect of behavioral preferences on skill acquisition in determining unspecified, suitable action patterns to control humanoid robots.行为偏好对技能习得在确定控制人形机器人的未指定合适动作模式方面的影响。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:7586-9. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320148.

引用本文的文献

1
Deception detection in educational AI: challenges for Japanese middle school students in interacting with generative AI robots.教育人工智能中的欺骗检测:日本中学生与生成式人工智能机器人互动面临的挑战。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Dec 18;7:1493348. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1493348. eCollection 2024.
2
Deception detection with machine learning: A systematic review and statistical analysis.使用机器学习进行欺骗检测:系统评价和统计分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 9;18(2):e0281323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281323. eCollection 2023.
3
Augmented Reality Meets Artificial Intelligence in Robotics: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits.介绍简短黑暗三性格量表(SD3):一种对黑暗人格特质的简短测量工具。
Assessment. 2014 Feb;21(1):28-41. doi: 10.1177/1073191113514105. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
2
Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: a review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches.通过对说谎者施加认知负荷来提高测谎水平:基于测谎仪方法的经验教训指导下对相关理论和技术的综述。
Front Psychol. 2013 Feb 1;4:14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00014. eCollection 2013.
3
Understanding receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
机器人技术中的增强现实与人工智能:系统综述
Front Robot AI. 2021 Sep 22;8:724798. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.724798. eCollection 2021.
4
Truth and lies in your eyes: Pupil dilation of White participants in truthful and deceptive responses to White and Black partners.在你的眼中是真相还是谎言:在对白人及黑人伙伴做出真实及欺骗反应时,白人参与者的瞳孔扩张。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 13;15(10):e0239512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239512. eCollection 2020.
理解受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。
CJEM. 2006 Jan;8(1):19-20. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500013336.
4
On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?论供述心理:无罪是否会让无辜者陷入危险?
Am Psychol. 2005 Apr;60(3):215-28. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215.
5
Cues to deception.欺骗的线索。
Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):74-118. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74.
6
Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing.以瞳孔反应作为认知加工指标对欺骗进行区分。
Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):205-11.
7
Using response time measures to assess "guilty knowledge".使用反应时间测量来评估“有罪知识”。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Feb;85(1):30-7. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.30.
8
Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of polygraph tests.心理和身体应对措施会降低测谎仪测试的准确性。
J Appl Psychol. 1994 Apr;79(2):252-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.252.
9
The endogenous eyeblink.内源性眨眼
Psychophysiology. 1984 Jan;21(1):22-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb02312.x.