Vitreo-retina service, Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;28(6):509-515. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1877730. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of blindness in low- and middle-income countries. This study aims to assess the agreement and diagnostic test accuracy of DR grading using fundus photographs by the allied medical personnel (AMP) as compared to ophthalmologist at DR screening program.: Two 45 degree disc-centred and macula centred fundus photographs captured using digital fundus camera from 1344 eyes were graded by six AMP twice at three months and six months of training. DR grading was done using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria. Retina specialist grading was taken as the reference standard. Percentage agreement using kappa coefficient (k) and diagnostic test accuracy were assessed.: Intra-rater agreement of most AMP was almost perfect for detection of any DR and vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) at three and six months. Inter-rater agreement at 3 months at second grading was substantial for any DR (k = 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.68) and VTDR (k = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.47-0.75). Inter-rater agreement in 6 months at second grading was also substantial for any DR (k = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.61-0.71) and VTDR (k = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.52-0.75). The sensitivity and specificity for any DR at second grading in 3 months was 94.99% and 63.97% and at 6 months was 95.55% and 66.91%, respectively.: The inter-rater agreement of AMP as compared to ophthalmologists for any DR or VTDR was substantial at both 3 and 6 months. AMP can support as first-level DR graders for timely referral and treatment of VTDR.
糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)是低收入和中等收入国家致盲的主要原因。本研究旨在评估在 DR 筛查项目中,与眼科医生相比,联合医务人员(AMP)使用眼底照片进行 DR 分级的一致性和诊断测试准确性。
从 1344 只眼中使用数字眼底相机拍摄了两张 45 度盘中心和黄斑中心的眼底照片,由六名 AMP 进行两次分级,分别在三个月和六个月的培训后进行。DR 分级采用早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究标准。视网膜专家的分级作为参考标准。使用kappa 系数(k)评估百分比一致性和诊断测试准确性。
大多数 AMP 的内部评估者在三个月和六个月时对任何 DR 和威胁视力的糖尿病性视网膜病变(VTDR)的检测具有几乎完美的一致性。在第二次分级的 3 个月时,两位评估者之间的一致性在任何 DR(k=0.62;95%置信区间(CI):0.67-0.68)和 VTDR(k=0.63;95%CI:0.47-0.75)方面为中等。在第二次分级的 6 个月时,任何 DR(k=0.66;95%CI:0.61-0.71)和 VTDR(k=0.64;95%CI:0.52-0.75)方面的评估者之间的一致性也很高。在 3 个月时第二次分级的任何 DR 的敏感性和特异性分别为 94.99%和 63.97%,在 6 个月时分别为 95.55%和 66.91%。
在 3 个月和 6 个月时,与眼科医生相比,AMP 的评估者之间对任何 DR 或 VTDR 的一致性都很高。AMP 可以作为一级 DR 分级人员,及时转诊和治疗 VTDR。