Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2021 Mar 15;61(3):204-210. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0221. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
More complex aneurysms can be treated by coil embolization with neck-bridge stent assistance. However, concerns about postprocedural ischemic or hemorrhagic complications remain. In this study, we assessed the long-term durability after introduction of neck-bridge stent in the context of coil embolization for unruptured aneurysm by comparing re-treatment and neurological events between the pre-stent and stent eras. Unruptured aneurysms treated by coil embolization between April 2005 and May 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. We divided cases into two groups: the pre-stent era and the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment and neurological events were assessed and compared. During the period, 177 aneurysms were treated in the pre-stent era and 354 aneurysms were treated in the stent era. The median follow-up was 55 months. In the stent era, the dome/neck (D/N) ratio was significantly lower (P <0.001) and the number of aneurysms located at the posterior circulation was higher (P <0.001). A stent was used in 31.92% of cases in the stent era. The cumulative rate of re-treatment was significantly higher in the pre-stent era than it was in the stent era in univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.008, P = 0.008, respectively). The cumulative rate of neurological events was not significantly different between the two groups. The re-treatment rate has been improved without increasing neurological complications after introduction of the neck-bridge stent.
更复杂的动脉瘤可以通过带颈桥支架辅助的线圈栓塞来治疗。然而,对于术后缺血或出血性并发症的担忧仍然存在。在这项研究中,我们通过比较支架前和支架时代的再治疗和神经事件,评估了带颈桥支架在未破裂动脉瘤线圈栓塞中的长期耐久性。回顾性分析了 2005 年 4 月至 2018 年 5 月期间接受线圈栓塞治疗的未破裂动脉瘤。我们将病例分为两组:支架前时代和支架时代。评估和比较了再治疗和神经事件的累积发生率。在此期间,支架前时代治疗了 177 个动脉瘤,支架时代治疗了 354 个动脉瘤。中位随访时间为 55 个月。在支架时代,瘤颈比(D/N)明显较低(P<0.001),且后循环的动脉瘤数量更高(P<0.001)。支架时代有 31.92%的病例使用了支架。支架时代的再治疗累积率在单变量和多变量分析中均显著高于支架前时代(P=0.008,P=0.008)。两组之间的神经事件累积率没有显著差异。引入颈桥支架后,再治疗率得到了提高,而神经并发症没有增加。