Suppr超能文献

基于人群的老年人功能残疾筛查

Population-Based Screening for Functional Disability in Older Adults.

作者信息

Ankuda Claire K, Freedman Vicki A, Covinsky Kenneth E, Kelley Amy S

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

出版信息

Innov Aging. 2020 Dec 22;5(1):igaa065. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igaa065. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Screening for functional disability is a promising strategy to identify high-need older adults. We compare 2 disability measures, activities of daily living (ADLs), and life space constriction (LSC), in predicting hospitalization and mortality in older adults.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used the nationally representative National Health and Aging Trends Study of 30,885 observations of adults aged 65 years and older. Outcomes were 1-year mortality and hospitalization. Predictors were ADLs (receiving help with bathing, eating, dressing, toileting, getting out of bed, walking inside) and LSC (frequency of leaving home).

RESULTS

Of respondents, 12.4% reported 3 or more ADLs and 10.8% reported rarely/never leaving home. ADL disability and LSC predicted high rates of 1-year mortality and hospitalization: of those with 3 or more ADLs, 46.4% died and 41.0% were hospitalized; of those who never/rarely left home, 40.7% died and 37.0% were hospitalized. Of those with 3 or more ADLs and who never/rarely left home, 58.4% died. ADL and LSC disability combined was more predictive of 1-year mortality and hospitalization than either measure alone. ADL disability and LSC screens identified overlapping but distinct populations. LSC identified more women (72.6% vs 63.8% with ADL disability), more people who live alone (40.7% vs 30.7%), fewer who were White (71.7% vs 76.2%) with cancer (27.6% vs 32.4), and reported pain (67.1% vs 70.0%).

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

LSC and ADLs both independently predicted mortality and hospitalization but using both screens was most predictive. Routine screening for ADLs and LSC could help health systems identify those at high risk for mortality and health care use.

摘要

背景与目的

筛查功能残疾是识别高需求老年人的一项有前景的策略。我们比较两种残疾测量方法,即日常生活活动能力(ADL)和生活空间受限(LSC),以预测老年人的住院率和死亡率。

研究设计与方法

我们使用具有全国代表性的国家健康与老龄化趋势研究,该研究对30885名65岁及以上成年人进行了观察。结局指标为1年死亡率和住院率。预测因素为ADL(在洗澡、进食、穿衣、如厕、起床、室内行走方面接受帮助)和LSC(离家频率)。

结果

在受访者中,12.4%报告有3项或更多ADL,10.8%报告很少/从不离家。ADL残疾和LSC预测了较高的1年死亡率和住院率:在有3项或更多ADL的人群中,46.4%死亡,41.0%住院;在从不/很少离家的人群中,40.7%死亡,37.0%住院。在有3项或更多ADL且从不/很少离家的人群中,58.4%死亡。ADL和LSC残疾综合起来比单独使用任何一种测量方法更能预测1年死亡率和住院率。ADL残疾和LSC筛查识别出了重叠但不同的人群。LSC识别出更多女性(72.6%对ADL残疾的63.8%)、更多独居者(40.7%对30.7%)、更少白人(71.7%对76.2%)、更少患癌症者(27.6%对32.4%),且报告疼痛者更少(67.1%对70.0%)。

讨论与启示

LSC和ADL均能独立预测死亡率和住院率,但同时使用两种筛查方法预测性最强。对ADL和LSC进行常规筛查有助于卫生系统识别出死亡和医疗保健使用风险高的人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3e8/7817111/a5ece37cc080/igaa065_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验