• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危重转院患者 30 天院内死亡率模型的建立与验证:一项回顾性队列研究。

Development and Validation of a 30-Day In-hospital Mortality Model Among Seriously Ill Transferred Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Indiana University Health Physicians Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2244-2250. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06593-z. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-021-06593-z
PMID:33506405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7840078/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality on admission is challenging but essential for risk stratification of patient outcomes and designing an appropriate plan-of-care, especially among transferred patients.

OBJECTIVE

Develop a model that uses administrative and clinical data within 24 h of transfer to predict 30-day in-hospital mortality at an Academic Health Center (AHC).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study. We used 30 putative variables in a multiple logistic regression model in the full data set (n = 10,389) to identify 20 candidate variables obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR) within 24 h of admission that were associated with 30-day in-hospital mortality (p < 0.05). These 20 variables were tested using multiple logistic regression and area under the curve (AUC)-receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to identify an optimal risk threshold score in a randomly split derivation sample (n = 5194) which was then examined in the validation sample (n = 5195).

PARTICIPANTS

Ten thousand three hundred eighty-nine patients greater than 18 years transferred to the Indiana University (IU)-Adult Academic Health Center (AHC) between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2017.

MAIN MEASURES

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, C-statistic, and risk threshold score of the model.

KEY RESULTS

The final model was strongly discriminative (C-statistic = 0.90) and had a good fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test [X (8) =6.26, p = 0.62]). The positive predictive value for 30-day in-hospital death was 68%; AUC-ROC was 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.92, p < 0.0001). We identified a risk threshold score of -2.19 that had a maximum sensitivity (79.87%) and specificity (85.24%) in the derivation and validation sample (sensitivity: 75.00%, specificity: 85.71%). In the validation sample, 34.40% (354/1029) of the patients above this threshold died compared to only 2.83% (118/4166) deaths below this threshold.

CONCLUSION

This model can use EMR and administrative data within 24 h of transfer to predict the risk of 30-day in-hospital mortality with reasonable accuracy among seriously ill transferred patients.

摘要

背景

预测入院时院内死亡率的风险具有挑战性,但对于患者结局的风险分层和制定适当的治疗计划至关重要,尤其是在转院患者中。

目的

开发一种模型,该模型使用转院后 24 小时内的管理和临床数据来预测学术医疗中心(AHC)的 30 天院内死亡率。

设计

回顾性队列研究。我们在全数据集(n=10389)中使用了 30 个假定变量的多元逻辑回归模型,以确定 20 个候选变量,这些变量是从入院后 24 小时内的电子病历(EMR)中获得的,与 30 天院内死亡率相关(p<0.05)。这些 20 个变量使用多元逻辑回归和曲线下面积(AUC)-接受者操作特征(ROC)分析进行测试,以在随机分割的推导样本(n=5194)中确定最佳风险阈值评分,然后在验证样本(n=5195)中进行检查。

参与者

2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间,10389 名年龄大于 18 岁的患者转至印第安纳大学(IU)成人学术医疗中心(AHC)。

主要测量指标

模型的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、C 统计量和风险阈值评分。

主要结果

最终模型具有很强的判别能力(C 统计量=0.90),拟合度良好(Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验[X(8)=6.26,p=0.62])。30 天院内死亡的阳性预测值为 68%;AUC-ROC 为 0.90(95%置信区间 0.89-0.92,p<0.0001)。我们确定了一个风险阈值评分-2.19,在推导和验证样本中具有最高的灵敏度(79.87%)和特异性(85.24%)(灵敏度:75.00%,特异性:85.71%)。在验证样本中,34.40%(354/1029)的患者超过该阈值,而只有 2.83%(118/4166)的患者低于该阈值死亡。

结论

该模型可以使用转院后 24 小时内的 EMR 和管理数据,在严重转院患者中以合理的准确性预测 30 天院内死亡率的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba67/8342683/c21990d7ea7c/11606_2021_6593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba67/8342683/c21990d7ea7c/11606_2021_6593_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba67/8342683/c21990d7ea7c/11606_2021_6593_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a 30-Day In-hospital Mortality Model Among Seriously Ill Transferred Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study.危重转院患者 30 天院内死亡率模型的建立与验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2244-2250. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06593-z. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Derivation and validation of the acute organ failure score to predict outcome in critically ill patients: a cohort study.急性器官衰竭评分的推导与验证以预测危重症患者的预后:一项队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):856-64. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000858.
3
A novel risk score for in-hospital perioperative mortality of five major surgeries.一种用于五种主要手术围手术期院内死亡的新风险评分。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 May 19;33(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab080.
4
Predicting hospital mortality for patients in the intensive care unit: a comparison of artificial neural networks with logistic regression models.预测重症监护病房患者的医院死亡率:人工神经网络与逻辑回归模型的比较
Crit Care Med. 2001 Feb;29(2):291-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200102000-00012.
5
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis-ABCD-10.Stevens-Johnson 综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者住院死亡率风险预测模型的建立与验证-ABCD-10
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Apr 1;155(4):448-454. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5605.
6
Novel model for predicting inpatient mortality after emergency admission to hospital in Singapore: retrospective observational study.新加坡急诊住院患者死亡的预测新模型:回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e031382. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031382.
7
Derivation and validation of in-hospital mortality prediction models in ischaemic stroke patients using administrative data.利用行政数据对缺血性脑卒中患者院内死亡率预测模型的推导和验证。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(1):73-80. doi: 10.1159/000346090. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
8
Model to predict inpatient mortality from information gathered at presentation to an emergency department: The Triage Information Mortality Model (TIMM).通过在急诊科就诊时收集的信息预测住院死亡率的模型:分诊信息死亡率模型(TIMM)。
Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Aug;27(4):300-6. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12425. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
9
Derivation and Internal Validation of a Clinical Prediction Tool for 30-Day Mortality in Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.下消化道出血30天死亡率临床预测工具的推导与内部验证
Am J Med. 2017 May;130(5):601.e1-601.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.12.009. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Development and Performance of Electronic Pediatric Risk of Mortality and Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 Automated Acuity Scores.电子儿童死亡风险和儿科逻辑器官功能障碍-2 自动评估分数的制定和性能。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;20(8):e372-e379. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001998.

引用本文的文献

1
ASPIRE: A Program for Developing Clinician Educators' Scholarship, Advancement, and Sense of Community.ASPIRE:培养临床教育者学术能力、晋升和社区意识的项目。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1953-1962. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07243-0. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
The Indiana Learning Health System Initiative: Early experience developing a collaborative, regional learning health system.印第安纳学习健康系统计划:建立协作式区域学习健康系统的早期经验
Learn Health Syst. 2021 Jun 23;5(3):e10281. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10281. eCollection 2021 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Quality of Care for Seriously Ill Patients: Opportunities for Hospitalists.提高重病患者的护理质量:医院医师的机会。
J Hosp Med. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):194-197. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2896. Epub 2017 Dec 20.