• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis-ABCD-10.Stevens-Johnson 综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者住院死亡率风险预测模型的建立与验证-ABCD-10
JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Apr 1;155(4):448-454. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5605.
2
Comparing the Accuracy of ABCD-10 and SCORTEN in Predicting the In-Hospital Mortality of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Multi-Institutional Study from Central China.比较 ABCD-10 和 SCORTEN 在预测 Stevens-Johnson 综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症住院死亡率中的准确性:来自中国中部的多机构研究。
Dermatology. 2022;238(4):736-744. doi: 10.1159/000520494. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
3
Assessment and Comparison of Performance of ABCD-10 and SCORTEN in Prognostication of Epidermal Necrolysis.评估和比较 ABCD-10 和 SCORTEN 在预测表皮松解坏死症中的性能。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;156(12):1294-1299. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3654.
4
Performance of ABCD-10 and SCORTEN mortality prediction models in a cohort of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis.ABCD-10和SCORTEN死亡率预测模型在史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者队列中的表现。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Oct;85(4):873-877. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.082. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Cohort study of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in China: evaluation of risk models and new predictor of pulmonary consolidation on computed tomography.中国 Stevens-Johnson 综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者的队列研究:风险模型评估和 CT 上肺实变的新预测因子。
Front Med. 2021 Aug;15(4):585-593. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0817-2. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Improvement of Mortality Prognostication in Patients With Epidermal Necrolysis: The Role of Novel Inflammatory Markers and Proposed Revision of SCORTEN (Re-SCORTEN).表皮松解型坏死性松解症患者死亡率预测的改善:新型炎症标志物的作用和 SCORTEN(再-SCORTEN)的修订建议。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Feb 1;158(2):160-166. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.5119.
7
How Does SCORTEN Score?SCORTEN评分是如何计算的?
J Burn Care Res. 2018 Jun 13;39(4):555-561. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irx016.
8
RDW-SD and PCT Are Potential Prognostic Factors for In-hospital Death in Patients With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.红细胞分布宽度标准差(RDW-SD)和降钙素原(PCT)是史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者院内死亡的潜在预后因素。
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2023 Nov;15(6):812-824. doi: 10.4168/aair.2023.15.6.812.
9
SCORTEN: a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis.SCORTEN:一种中毒性表皮坏死松解症的疾病严重程度评分系统。
J Invest Dermatol. 2000 Aug;115(2):149-53. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2000.00061.x.
10
Ophthalmic Manifestations of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Relation to SCORTEN.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的眼部表现及其与 SCORTEN 的关系。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Oct;150(4):505-510.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying New Candidate Predictors of Mortality in Japanese Patients with Severe Drug Eruptions.识别日本重症药疹患者死亡的新候选预测指标
Drug Saf. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01572-3.
2
Recent developments in the research of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症研究的最新进展:发病机制、诊断与治疗
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jun 5;30(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02664-7.
3
Toxic epidermal necrolysis - clinicopathological aspects and therapeutic management.中毒性表皮坏死松解症——临床病理特征与治疗管理
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024 Oct-Dec;65(4):765-773. doi: 10.47162/RJME.65.4.23.
4
Morbilliform Eruptions: Differentiating Low-Risk Drug Eruptions, Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions, Viral Eruptions, and Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease.麻疹样皮疹:鉴别低风险药物疹、严重皮肤不良反应、病毒疹及急性移植物抗宿主病。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 May;26(3):379-393. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00924-0. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
5
Epidemiological Characteristics and Prognostic Scoring in Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome: Insights from a 17-Year Burn Center Experience.中毒性表皮坏死松解症和史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征的流行病学特征及预后评分:来自一家烧伤中心17年经验的见解
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 3;61(1):66. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010066.
6
D-Penicillamine-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome in a Patient with Gold Cyanide Intoxication: A Case Report.一名氰化金中毒患者发生的青霉胺诱发的史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征:病例报告
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2024 Oct 28;17:2409-2415. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S489028. eCollection 2024.
7
Cyclosporin for the treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN): a systematic review of observational studies and clinical trials focusing on single therapy, combination therapy, and comparative assessments.环孢素治疗史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)和中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN):一项关于观察性研究和临床试验的系统评价,重点关注单一疗法、联合疗法及对比评估。
Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Feb;33(2):485-503. doi: 10.1007/s10787-024-01590-0. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
8
Incidence, In-Hospital and Long-Term Mortality, and Sequelae of Epidermal Necrolysis in Adults.成人表皮松解症的发病率、住院及长期死亡率和后遗症
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Dec 1;160(12):1288-1296. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3575.
9
Update on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Diagnosis and Management.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的最新进展:诊断与治疗。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 Nov;25(6):891-908. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00889-6. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
10
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Analysis of the Russian Database of Spontaneous Reports.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症:俄罗斯自发报告数据库分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 May 24;17(6):675. doi: 10.3390/ph17060675.

本文引用的文献

1
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 377 Adult Patients from the United States.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症:美国 377 例成年患者的多中心回顾性研究。
J Invest Dermatol. 2018 Nov;138(11):2315-2321. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
2
Renal replacement therapy during Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a retrospective observational study of 238 patients.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症期间的肾脏替代治疗:一项对238例患者的回顾性观察研究
Br J Dermatol. 2017 May;176(5):1370-1372. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14934. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
3
Morbidity and Mortality of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in United States Adults.美国成年人史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的发病率与死亡率
J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Jul;136(7):1387-1397. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.03.023. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
4
A clinicotherapeutic analysis of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis with an emphasis on the predictive value and accuracy of SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的临床治疗分析,重点关注中毒性表皮坏死松解症评分(SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis)的预测价值和准确性。
Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jan;54(1):e18-26. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12466.
5
27 years of a single burn centre experience with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: analysis of mortality risk for causative agents.27 年单一烧伤中心史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症的经验:病因死亡率分析。
Burns. 2013 Nov;39(7):1449-55. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.03.011. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
Comprehensive survival analysis of a cohort of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis.史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者队列的综合生存分析。
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 May;133(5):1197-204. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.510. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
7
Toxic epidermal necrolysis: performance of SCORTEN and the score-based comparison of the efficacy of corticosteroid therapy and intravenous immunoglobulin combined therapy in China.中毒性表皮坏死松解症:SCORTEN评分系统的应用以及中国糖皮质激素疗法与静脉注射免疫球蛋白联合疗法疗效的评分比较
J Burn Care Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;33(6):e295-308. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318254d2ec.
8
SCORTEN and impaired renal function related to mortality of toxic epidermal necrolysis syndrome patients in the Asian population.SCORTEN 评分与肾功能损伤与亚洲人群中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者死亡率相关。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 May;27(5):628-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04502.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
9
Toxic epidermal necrolysis: five years of treatment experience from a burn unit.中毒性表皮坏死松解症:烧伤科五年治疗经验。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Oct;67(4):630-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
10
Evaluation of SCORTEN on a cohort of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis included in the RegiSCAR study.对纳入RegiSCAR研究的一组史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者进行SCORTEN评估。
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Mar-Apr;32(2):237-45. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820aafbc.

Stevens-Johnson 综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症患者住院死亡率风险预测模型的建立与验证-ABCD-10

Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis-ABCD-10.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2019 Apr 1;155(4):448-454. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5605.

DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.5605
PMID:30840032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6459085/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) is a spectrum of severe mucocutaneous drug reaction associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A previously developed SJS/TEN-specific severity-of-illness model (Score of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis [SCORTEN]) has been reported to overestimate and underestimate SJS/TEN-related in-hospital mortality in various populations.

OBJECTIVE

To derive a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality among patients with SJS/TEN and to compare prognostic accuracy with the SCORTEN model in a multi-institutional cohort of patients in the United States.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from a multicenter cohort of patients 18 years and older treated for SJS/TEN between January 1, 2000, and June 1, 2015, were obtained from inpatient consult databases and electronic medical record systems at 18 medical centers in the United States as part of the Society for Dermatology Hospitalists. A risk model was derived based on data from 370 of these patients. Model discrimination (calculated as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and calibration (calculated as predicted vs observed mortality, and examined using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic) were assessed, and the predictive accuracy was compared with that of SCORTEN. All analysis took place between December 2016 and April 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

In-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among 370 patients (mean [SD] age 49.0 [19.1] years; 195 [52.7%] women), 54 (15.14%) did not survive to hospital discharge. Five covariates, measured at the time of admission, were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality: age in years (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07), body surface area (BSA) in percentage of epidermal detachment (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04), serum bicarbonate level below 20 mmol/L (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.43-5.88), active cancer (OR, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.82-10.61), and dialysis prior to admission (OR, 15.94; 95% CI, 3.38-66.30). A severity-of-illness score was calculated by taking the sum of 1 point each for age 50 years or older, epidermal detachment greater than 10% of BSA, and serum bicarbonate level below 20 mmol/L; 2 points for the presence of active cancer; and 3 points for dialysis prior to admission. The score was named ABCD-10 (age, bicarbonate, cancer, dialysis, 10% BSA). The ABCD-10 model showed good discrimination (AUC, 0.816; 95% CI, 0.759-0.872) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test, P = .30). For SCORTEN, on admission, the AUC was 0.827 (95% CI, 0.774-0.879) and was not significantly different from that of the ABCD-10 model (P = .72).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort of patients with SJS/TEN, ABCD-10 accurately predicted in-hospital mortality, with discrimination that was not significantly different from SCORTEN. Additional research is needed to validate ABCD-10 in other populations. Future use of a new mortality prediction model may provide improved prognostic information for contemporary patients, including those enrolled in observational studies and therapeutic trials.

摘要

重要性

史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症(SJS/TEN)是一种严重的黏膜皮肤药物反应谱,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。先前开发的 SJS/TEN 特异性疾病严重程度模型(毒性表皮坏死松解评分 [SCORTEN])已被报道在不同人群中高估和低估 SJS/TEN 相关的住院死亡率。

目的

为 SJS/TEN 患者的住院死亡率建立风险预测模型,并与美国多机构队列中的 SCORTEN 模型进行比较。

设计、设置和参与者:从美国 18 个医疗中心的住院咨询数据库和电子病历系统中获取了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 1 日期间治疗 SJS/TEN 的 18 岁及以上患者的多中心队列数据。基于其中 370 例患者的数据,得出风险模型。评估了模型的区分度(计算为接收者操作特征曲线下的面积 [AUC])和校准度(计算为预测与观察死亡率,并使用 Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验进行检查),并与 SCORTEN 进行了比较。所有分析均在 2016 年 12 月至 2018 年 4 月之间进行。

主要结果和措施

住院死亡率。

结果

在 370 例患者中(平均[标准差]年龄 49.0[19.1]岁;195[52.7%]为女性),54 例(15.14%)未存活至出院。入院时测量的 5 个协变量是住院死亡率的独立预测因素:年龄(比值比[OR],1.05;95%置信区间 [CI],1.02-1.07)、表皮脱落占体表面积(BSA)的百分比(OR,1.02;95% CI,1.01-1.04)、血清碳酸氢盐水平低于 20 mmol/L(OR,2.90;95% CI,1.43-5.88)、活动性癌症(OR,4.40;95% CI,1.82-10.61)和入院前透析(OR,15.94;95% CI,3.38-66.30)。通过在年龄 50 岁或以上、表皮脱落大于 BSA 的 10%和血清碳酸氢盐水平低于 20 mmol/L时各加 1 分,存在活动性癌症时加 2 分,以及入院前透析时加 3 分,计算出疾病严重程度评分。该评分命名为 ABCD-10(年龄、碳酸氢盐、癌症、透析、10%BSA)。ABCD-10 模型显示出良好的区分度(AUC,0.816;95% CI,0.759-0.872)和校准度(Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验,P=0.30)。对于 SCORTEN,入院时 AUC 为 0.827(95% CI,0.774-0.879),与 ABCD-10 模型无显著差异(P=0.72)。

结论和相关性

在本队列的 SJS/TEN 患者中,ABCD-10 准确预测了住院死亡率,其区分度与 SCORTEN 无显著差异。需要进一步研究来验证 ABCD-10 在其他人群中的应用。未来使用新的死亡率预测模型可能为包括观察性研究和治疗性试验中的患者提供改善的预后信息。