de la Hoz M, Garrido D, García-Retamero R
Universidad de Granada, Granada, España.
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Talavera de la Reina, España.
Rev Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;72(3):67-76. doi: 10.33588/rn.7203.2020411.
The neuropsychological profile of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been the target of several investigations. However, few works have been published about the language profile in these patients.
To analyse and integrate the published scientific literature about this topic after the systematic review carried out by Johnson and Lin in 2014.
A systematic review was carried out in which three databases (Web of Science, PubMed and PsycInfo) were consulted. Seventeen studies have been analysed, with adult participants diagnosed with MCI, that included at least one control group, and studies that evaluated language parameters. A self-made registration protocol has been applied to encode the characteristics and results of the studies; and the quality of the studies and articles has been evaluated through a self-elaboration scale based on previously validated instruments.
Patients with MCI can present deficits in naming, speech production, oral comprehension, and written comprehension.
It is important to evaluate language in patients with MCI, although this exploration does not allow establishing a diagnosis on by itself. However, the pathology variability associated with the diagnosis, the age, the language, and the educational level of the participants, as well as the sample size, and the instruments and measures used to evaluate the language in the studies reviewed, make impossible to obtain a conclusive statement, so further research about this topic is needed.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的神经心理学特征一直是多项研究的目标。然而,关于这些患者语言特征的研究发表较少。
在2014年约翰逊和林进行系统评价之后,分析和整合关于该主题的已发表科学文献。
进行了一项系统评价,查阅了三个数据库(科学网、PubMed和PsycInfo)。分析了17项研究,这些研究的成年参与者被诊断为MCI,包括至少一个对照组,以及评估语言参数的研究。应用自制的登记协议对研究的特征和结果进行编码;并通过基于先前验证工具的自编量表对研究和文章的质量进行评估。
MCI患者在命名、言语表达、口语理解和书面理解方面可能存在缺陷。
评估MCI患者的语言很重要,尽管这种探索本身并不能确诊。然而,与诊断相关的病理变异性、参与者的年龄、语言和教育水平,以及样本量,以及在 reviewed 研究中用于评估语言的工具和测量方法,使得无法得出结论性陈述,因此需要对该主题进行进一步研究。