Parenting and Family Support Centre, School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Family Action Centre, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Apr;65(4):306-319. doi: 10.1111/jir.12813. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Parents of children with developmental or intellectual disabilities tend to report greater use of coercive parenting practices relative to parents of typically developing children, increasing the risk of adverse child outcomes. However, to date, there is limited research exploring the role and relative contribution of modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors in parents of children with a disability. The present study aimed to explore the role of various modifiable and nonmodifiable parenting, family and sociodemographic factors associated with the use of coercive parenting practices in parents of children with a disability.
Caregivers (N = 1392) enrolled in the Mental Health of Young People with Developmental Disabilities (MHYPeDD) programme in Australia completed a cross-sectional survey about their parenting and their child aged 2-12 years with a disability. Measures covered a range of domains including relevant demographic and family background, use of coercive parenting practices, intensity of child behavioural difficulties and questions relating to parent and family functioning such as parental self-efficacy, adjustment difficulties and quality of family relationships.
Parents of older children, those who were younger at the birth of their child, and parents who were co-parenting or working reported more use of coercive parenting practices. Greater intensity of child difficulties, poorer parental self-efficacy and parent-child relationships, and more parental adjustment difficulties were also significantly associated with more use of coercive parenting. Examination of the relative contribution of variables revealed parent-child relationship was a key contributing factor, followed by intensity of child behaviour problems, parent adjustment and parent confidence.
These findings highlight a range of factors that should be targeted and modified through upstream prevention programmes and further inform our understanding of how coercive practices may be influenced through targeted parenting interventions.
与发育或智力残疾儿童的父母相比,通常发育儿童的父母往往报告更多地使用强制性养育实践,从而增加了儿童不良后果的风险。但是,迄今为止,关于残疾儿童父母的可改变和不可改变的风险因素的作用及其相对贡献的研究有限。本研究旨在探讨各种可改变和不可改变的养育、家庭和社会人口因素在残疾儿童父母中与使用强制性养育实践的关系。
在澳大利亚参加年轻人发育障碍心理健康(MHYPeDD)计划的护理人员(N=1392)完成了一项关于他们的育儿情况和他们 2-12 岁残疾儿童的横断面调查。测量涵盖了一系列领域,包括相关的人口统计和家庭背景、强制性养育实践的使用、儿童行为困难的严重程度以及与父母和家庭功能相关的问题,例如父母自我效能感、适应困难和家庭关系质量。
年龄较大的孩子的父母、孩子出生时年龄较小的父母、共同养育或工作的父母报告说更多地使用了强制性养育实践。儿童困难的严重程度、父母自我效能感和亲子关系较差以及父母适应困难程度较高也与更多地使用强制性养育实践显著相关。对变量的相对贡献的考察表明,亲子关系是一个关键的促成因素,其次是儿童行为问题的严重程度、父母的适应情况和父母的信心。
这些发现强调了一系列应通过上游预防计划针对和改变的因素,并进一步阐明了我们对强制性实践如何可能通过有针对性的养育干预来影响的理解。