Suppr超能文献

单纯减压与减压加融合治疗退变性腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Effectiveness and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shen Zhubin, Guan Xiaojing, Wang Rui, Xue Qian, Zhang Ding, Zong Yuan, Ma Wenxuan, Zhuge Ruijian, Liu Zhiming, He Changhao, Guo Li, Yin Fei

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jun;10(12):664. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2208.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been lingering controversies reported decompression and plus fusion. And the relative safety of fusion in addition to standard decompression remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone or combined with fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant literature from their inception to 28th December 2021. We identified the eligible studies based on the PICOS principles, populations (LSS with DS), interventions (decompression alone), controls (decompression combined with fusion), outcomes [overall reoperation rate, complications, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), operative time, the amount of blood lost, length of stay (LOS), and visual analog scales (VAS)], study design (cohort studies). Quality assessment for individual study was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

In all, 12 articles involving a total of 14,693 patients were finally included in the study, the majority of patients underwent decompression alone (DA group: n=11,598) and the rest underwent decompression associated with fusion (FU group: n=3,095). The quality of most of the included studies was regarded as high quality. The results indicated that the FU group had a higher rate of complication [relative risk (RR): 1.770, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.485 to 2.110], longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD): 51.037, 95% CI: 13.743 to 88.330], and increased blood loss (WMD: 258.354, 95% CI: 150.468 to 366.239) than the DA group (all P<0.05), with no significant differences for overall reoperation rate (RR: 0.879, 95% CI: 0.432 to 1.786), ODI (WMD: -2.569, 95% CI: -6.548 to 1.409), LOS (WMD: 3.838, 95% CI: -2.172 to 9.848), and VAS found between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LSS + DS, the effectiveness and safety of decompression alone may be superior to decompression plus fusion in terms of complication rate, operative time, and the amount of bleeding. However, more high-quality literature is needed in the future to confirm the best treatment choice for patients with LSS + DS.

摘要

背景

关于减压和融合加手术一直存在争议。标准减压联合融合的相对安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估单纯减压或减压联合融合治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)合并退行性椎体滑脱(DS)的有效性和安全性。

方法

在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库,以获取从数据库建立至2021年12月28日的相关文献。我们根据PICOS原则确定符合条件的研究,人群(LSS合并DS)、干预措施(单纯减压)、对照(减压联合融合)、结局指标[总体再次手术率、并发症、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、手术时间、失血量、住院时间(LOS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)]、研究设计(队列研究)。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)对个体研究进行质量评估。

结果

本研究最终纳入12篇文章,共14693例患者,大多数患者接受单纯减压(DA组:n = 11598),其余患者接受减压联合融合(FU组:n = 3095)。大多数纳入研究的质量被认为是高质量。结果表明,与DA组相比,FU组并发症发生率更高[相对危险度(RR):1.770,95%置信区间(CI):1.485至2.110],手术时间更长[加权均数差(WMD):51.037,95%CI:13.743至88.330],失血量增加(WMD:258.354,95%CI:150.468至366.239)(均P<0.05),两组在总体再次手术率(RR:0.879,95%CI:0.432至1.786)、ODI(WMD:-2.569,95%CI:-6.548至1.409)、LOS(WMD:3.838,95%CI:-2.172至9.848)和VAS方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

在LSS + DS患者中,单纯减压在并发症发生率、手术时间和出血量方面的有效性和安全性可能优于减压联合融合。然而,未来需要更多高质量的文献来确定LSS + DS患者的最佳治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73f5/9279815/5b71570605d3/atm-10-12-664-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验