Suppr超能文献

撒哈拉以南非洲地区艾滋病毒患者队列中使用的不同心血管风险评估工具的比较;我们是否需要纳入实验室检查?

Comparison of different cardiovascular risk tools used in HIV patient cohorts in sub-Saharan Africa; do we need to include laboratory tests?

作者信息

Mubiru Frank, Castelnuovo Barbara, Reynolds Steven J, Kiragga Agnes, Tibakabikoba Harriet, Owarwo Noela Clara, Kambugu Andrew, Lamorde Mohammed, Parkes-Ratanshi Rosalind

机构信息

Infectious Disease Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):e0243552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243552. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally, representing 31% of all global deaths. HIV and long term anti-retroviral therapy (ART) are risk factors for development of CVD in populations of people living with HIV (PLHIV). CVD risk assessment tools are currently being applied to SSA populations, but there are questions about accuracy as well as implementation challenges of these tools in lower resource setting populations. We aimed to assess the level of agreement between the various cardiovascular screening tools (Data collection on Adverse effects of anti-HIV Drugs (D:A:D), Framingham risk score, WHO risk score and The Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Score) when applied to an HIV ART experienced population in Sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS

This study was undertaken in an Anti-Retroviral Long Term (ALT) Cohort of 1000 PLHIV in care who have been on ART for at least 10 years in urban Uganda. A systematic review was undertaken to find the most frequently used screening tools from SSA PLHIV populations; these were applied to the ALT cohort. Levels of agreement between the resulting scores (those including lipids and non-lipids based, as well as HIV-specific and non-HIV specific) as applied to our cohort were compared. Prevalence Bias Adjusted Kappa was used to evaluate agreement between tools.

RESULTS

Overall, PLHIV in ALT cohort had a median score of 1.1-1.4% risk of a CVD event over 5 years and 1.7-2.5% risk of a CVD event over 10 years. There was no statistical difference in the risk scores obtained for this population when comparing the different tools, including comparisons of those with lipids and non-lipids, and HIV specific vs non-HIV specific.

CONCLUSION

The various tools yielded similar results, but those not including lipids are more feasible to apply in our setting. Long-term cohorts of PLHIV in SSA should in future provide longitudinal data to evaluate existing CVD risk prediction tools for these populations. Inclusion of HIV and ART history factors to existing scoring systems may improve accuracy without adding the expense and technical difficulty of lipid testing.

摘要

引言

心血管疾病(CVD)是全球主要死因,占全球总死亡人数的31%。艾滋病毒和长期抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)是艾滋病毒感染者(PLHIV)群体发生心血管疾病的风险因素。目前,心血管疾病风险评估工具正在应用于撒哈拉以南非洲地区的人群,但这些工具在资源匮乏地区人群中的准确性以及实施方面存在问题。我们旨在评估各种心血管筛查工具(抗逆转录病毒药物不良反应数据收集(D:A:D)、弗明汉风险评分、世界卫生组织风险评分和动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病评分)应用于撒哈拉以南非洲地区有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验的艾滋病毒感染者群体时的一致性水平。

方法

本研究在乌干达城市地区的一个抗逆转录病毒长期(ALT)队列中进行,该队列由1000名接受抗逆转录病毒治疗至少10年的艾滋病毒感染者组成。进行了一项系统评价,以找出撒哈拉以南非洲地区艾滋病毒感染者群体中最常用的筛查工具;这些工具应用于ALT队列。比较了应用于我们队列的所得分数(包括基于脂质和非脂质的分数,以及艾滋病毒特异性和非艾滋病毒特异性分数)之间的一致性水平。使用患病率偏差调整卡帕来评估工具之间的一致性。

结果

总体而言,ALT队列中的艾滋病毒感染者在5年内发生心血管疾病事件的风险中位数为1.1 - 1.4%,在10年内发生心血管疾病事件的风险中位数为1.7 - 2.5%。比较不同工具时,该人群获得的风险评分没有统计学差异,包括脂质和非脂质工具之间以及艾滋病毒特异性与非艾滋病毒特异性工具之间的比较。

结论

各种工具产生了相似的结果,但不包括脂质的工具在我们环境中应用更可行。撒哈拉以南非洲地区艾滋病毒感染者的长期队列未来应提供纵向数据,以评估针对这些人群的现有心血管疾病风险预测工具。将艾滋病毒和抗逆转录病毒治疗病史因素纳入现有评分系统可能会提高准确性,而无需增加脂质检测的费用和技术难度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb12/7842918/ac2cc9299bb7/pone.0243552.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验