Department of Urology, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2021 Apr;28(4):360-368. doi: 10.1111/iju.14491. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
A nerve-sparing procedure during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has been considered one of the most important techniques for preserving postoperative genitourinary function. The reason is that adequate nerve-sparing procedures could preserve both erectile function and lower urinary tract function after surgery. When a nerve-sparing procedure is carried out, the cavernous nerves themselves cannot be visualized, despite the magnified viewing field during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Thus, nerve-sparing procedures have been considered challenging operations, even now. However, because not all surgeons have carried out a sufficient number of nerve-sparing procedures, the development of new nerve-sparing procedures or new methods for mapping the cavernous nerves is required. Recently, various new operative techniques, for example, Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, transvesical robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and retrograde release of neurovascular bundle technique during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, have been developed. In addition, new surgical devices, for example, biological/bioengineering solutions for cavernous nerve protection and devices for identifying the cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy, have developed to preserve the cavernous nerves. In contrast, limitations or problems in preserving cavernous nerves and postoperative erectile function have become apparent. In particular, the recovery rate of erectile function, the positive surgical margin rate at the site of nerve-sparing and the indications for nerve sparing have become obvious with the accumulation of much evidence. Furthermore, predictive factors for postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing procedures have also been clarified. In this article, the importance of a comprehensive approach for early recovery of erectile function in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy era is discussed.
在机器人辅助前列腺根治术中进行神经保留术已被认为是保留术后泌尿生殖功能的最重要技术之一。原因是充分的神经保留术可以在手术后保留勃起功能和下尿路功能。当进行神经保留术时,尽管在机器人辅助前列腺根治术中可以放大视野,但海绵体神经本身无法可视化。因此,即使在现在,神经保留术也被认为是具有挑战性的手术。然而,由于并非所有外科医生都进行了足够数量的神经保留术,因此需要开发新的神经保留术或新的海绵体神经定位方法。最近,已经开发了各种新的手术技术,例如保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助前列腺根治术、经膀胱机器人辅助前列腺根治术和机器人辅助前列腺根治术中逆行释放神经血管束技术。此外,还开发了新的手术设备,例如用于保护海绵体神经的生物/生物工程解决方案以及用于在根治性前列腺切除术中识别海绵体神经的设备,以保护海绵体神经。相比之下,在保留海绵体神经和术后勃起功能方面的局限性或问题变得明显。特别是,随着证据的积累,勃起功能的恢复率、神经保留部位的阳性切缘率和神经保留的适应证变得明显。此外,神经保留术后勃起功能的预测因素也已得到阐明。在本文中,讨论了在机器人辅助前列腺根治术时代全面恢复勃起功能的重要性。