• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌风险适配治疗的临床和功能结果。

Clinical and functional outcomes for risk-appropriate treatments for prostate cancer.

作者信息

Tiruye Tenaw, O'Callaghan Michael, Ettridge Kerry, Moretti Kim, Jay Alex, Higgs Braden, Santoro Kerry, Kichenadasse Ganessan, Beckmann Kerri

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research Group, Allied Health and Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide Australia.

Public Health Department Debre Markos University Debre Markos Ethiopia.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2023 Sep 12;5(1):109-120. doi: 10.1002/bco2.288. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/bco2.288
PMID:38179028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10764171/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe real-world clinical and functional outcomes in an Australian cohort of men with localised prostate cancer according to treatment type and risk category.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Men diagnosed from 2008 to 2018 who were enrolled in South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry-a multi-institutional prospective clinical registry-were studied. The main outcome measures were overall survival, cancer-specific survival, decline in functional outcomes, biochemical recurrence and transition to active treatment following active surveillance. Multivariable adjusted models were applied to estimate outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 8513 eligible men, majority of men (46%) underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy (EBRT +/- ADT) in 22% of the cohort. Five-year overall survival was above 91%, and 5-year prostate cancer-specific survival was above 97% in the low- and intermediate-risk categories across all treatments. Five-year prostate cancer-specific survival in the active surveillance group was 100%. About 37% of men with high-risk disease treated with RP and 17% of men treated with EBRT +/- ADT experienced biochemical recurrence within 5 years of treatment. Of men on active surveillance, 15% of those with low risk and 20% with intermediate risk converted to active treatment within 2 years. The decline in urinary continence and sexual function 12 months after treatment was greatest among men who underwent RP while the decline in bowel function was greatest for men who received EBRT +/- ADT.

CONCLUSION

This contemporary real-world evidence on risk-appropriate treatment outcomes helps inform treatment decision-making for clinicians and patients.

摘要

目的

根据治疗类型和风险类别,描述澳大利亚一组局限性前列腺癌男性患者的真实世界临床和功能结局。

受试者与方法

对2008年至2018年确诊并纳入南澳大利亚前列腺癌临床结局协作登记处(一个多机构前瞻性临床登记处)的男性患者进行研究。主要结局指标包括总生存期、癌症特异性生存期、功能结局下降、生化复发以及主动监测后转为积极治疗的情况。应用多变量调整模型来估计结局。

结果

在8513名符合条件的男性中,大多数男性(46%)接受了根治性前列腺切除术(RP),22%的队列患者接受了有或无雄激素剥夺治疗的外照射放疗(EBRT±ADT)。在所有治疗方法的低风险和中风险类别中,5年总生存率高于91%,5年前列腺癌特异性生存率高于97%。主动监测组的5年前列腺癌特异性生存率为100%。接受RP治疗的高危疾病男性中约37%以及接受EBRT±ADT治疗的男性中17%在治疗后5年内出现生化复发。在接受主动监测的男性中,低风险者有15%、中风险者有20%在2年内转为积极治疗。治疗后12个月,接受RP的男性尿失禁和性功能下降最为明显,而接受EBRT±ADT的男性肠功能下降最为明显。

结论

这一关于风险适配治疗结局的当代真实世界证据有助于为临床医生和患者的治疗决策提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8385/10764171/a7c0b71df70a/BCO2-5-109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8385/10764171/a7c0b71df70a/BCO2-5-109-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8385/10764171/a7c0b71df70a/BCO2-5-109-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical and functional outcomes for risk-appropriate treatments for prostate cancer.前列腺癌风险适配治疗的临床和功能结果。
BJUI Compass. 2023 Sep 12;5(1):109-120. doi: 10.1002/bco2.288. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 5 Years for Active Surveillance, Surgery, Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiation With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局部前列腺癌主动监测、手术、近距离放疗或外照射放疗联合或不联合雄激素剥夺治疗 5 年的患者报告结局。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20675.
3
Association Between Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Patient-Reported Outcomes After 3 Years.局限性前列腺癌的放射治疗、手术或观察与3年后患者报告结局之间的关联
JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1126-1140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.1704.
4
Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer.患者报告的前列腺癌功能结局测量指标和治疗选择。
BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01117-1.
5
Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study).局限性前列腺癌治疗的功能和生活质量结局(前列腺癌检测和治疗研究 [ProtecT])。
BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-380. doi: 10.1111/bju.15739. Epub 2022 May 3.
6
Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.主动监测、根治性前列腺切除术和根治性放疗在 PSA 检测到的局限性前列腺癌中的应用:ProtecT 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Aug;24(37):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24370.
7
8
Comparative effectiveness of treatments for high-risk prostate cancer patients.高危前列腺癌患者治疗方法的比较效果。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Sep;37(9):574.e11-574.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.06.005. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
A prospective study of health-related quality of life outcomes among men treated for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: the impact of primary and secondary therapies.一项针对接受中高危前列腺癌治疗的男性健康相关生活质量结局的前瞻性研究:原发和继发治疗的影响。
Can J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(4):9809-9820.
10
Comparison of Multimodal Therapies and Outcomes Among Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer With Adverse Clinicopathologic Features.高危前列腺癌伴不良临床病理特征患者的多模式治疗比较及结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2115312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15312.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic and Geographic Disparities in Anorectal and Urinary Procedures Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌放疗后肛肠和泌尿系统手术的社会经济及地理差异
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71135. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71135.
2
Post-prostatectomy rehospitalisation rates and risk factors in South Australian men with prostate cancer: evidence from linked data.南澳大利亚州前列腺癌男性患者前列腺切除术后再入院率及危险因素:来自关联数据的证据
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04691-z.
3
Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in patient reported outcomes following radical prostatectomy: A bi-national registry-based study.根治性前列腺切除术患者报告结局的变化:一项基于两国登记的研究。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Feb;41(2):105.e9-105.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.020. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
2
A decade of declining prostatectomy margin positivity within a prostate cancer clinical quality registry.在一个前列腺癌临床质量登记处,前列腺切除术切缘阳性率下降的十年。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Dec;40(12):537.e19-537.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
3
Mortality and biochemical recurrence after surgery, brachytherapy, or external radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a 10-year follow-up cohort study.
前列腺癌的过度诊断与过度治疗
Diseases. 2025 May 24;13(6):167. doi: 10.3390/diseases13060167.
4
Comparing post-treatment urinary and colorectal procedures in prostate cancer patients using population-based linked data.利用基于人群的关联数据比较前列腺癌患者治疗后的泌尿系统和结直肠手术情况。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Apr;57(4):1189-1198. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04304-1. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
局限性前列腺癌手术后、近距离放射治疗或外放射治疗后的死亡率和生化复发:一项 10 年随访队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 22;12(1):12589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16395-w.
4
Evaluation of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy Use and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Men With Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰非转移性前列腺癌男性患者中采用低分割放射治疗的评估及患者报告结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2129647. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29647.
5
Comprehensive approach for preserving cavernous nerves and erectile function after radical prostatectomy in the era of robotic surgery.机器人手术时代根治性前列腺切除术后保护海绵体神经和勃起功能的综合方法。
Int J Urol. 2021 Apr;28(4):360-368. doi: 10.1111/iju.14491. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Reference-adjusted and standardized all-cause and crude probabilities as an alternative to net survival in population-based cancer studies.参考调整和标准化全因和粗概率作为基于人群的癌症研究中净生存的替代方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(5):1614-1623. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa112.
7
Real-World Evidence in Oncology: Opportunities and Limitations.肿瘤学中的真实世界证据:机遇与局限。
Oncologist. 2020 May;25(5):e746-e752. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0647. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Patient-reported outcome measures after treatment for prostate cancer: Results from the Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DAPROCAdata).前列腺癌治疗后患者报告的结局测量指标:来自丹麦前列腺癌登记处(DAPROCAdata)的数据。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;64:101623. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101623. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
Predicting Prostate Cancer Death with Different Pretreatment Risk Stratification Tools: A Head-to-head Comparison in a Nationwide Cohort Study.不同预处理风险分层工具预测前列腺癌死亡:全国队列研究中的头对头比较。
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.027. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
10
A contemporary, nationwide analysis of surgery and radiotherapy treatment for prostate cancer.一项针对前列腺癌手术和放射治疗的当代全国性分析。
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124 Suppl 1:31-36. doi: 10.1111/bju.14773. Epub 2019 Sep 5.