• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[《健康体能测量量表(V1.0)用于评估广州大学生健康体能的信效度》]

[Reliability and validity of Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale (V1.0) for evaluating healthy fitness of college students in Guangzhou].

作者信息

Liu Qian, Huang Chen, Jiang Lijie, Qiu Heng, Xu Jun

机构信息

School of Health Management, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Department of Economic Management, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Jan 30;41(1):47-54. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.06.

DOI:10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.06
PMID:33509752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7867479/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity of Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale V1.0 (HFMS V1.0) for assessing healthy fitness status of college students in Guangzhou.

METHODS

A total of 584 college students were evaluated with HFMS V1.0. The reliability and validity of HFMS V1.0 scale were assessed for its discrimination degree, Cronbach α coefficient, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, structural validity, calibration validity and responsiveness.

RESULTS

The Cronbach α of HFMS V1.0 scale was 0.893, the split-half coefficient was 0.909, and the test-retest coefficient was 0.923. The correlation coefficients of each dimension with its subscales ranged from 0.687 to 0.931. The correlation coefficient between each item and its dimension ranged from 0.558 to 0.863( < 0.05). Exploratory factor analysis showed that the variance interpretation of 8 factors was 55.105%, and the factor structure was basically identical with the theoretical concept of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent goodness-of-fit indices of the model (/DF= 1.952; RMSEA=0.400; GFI=0.906; TLI=0.905; IFI=0.914; and CFI=0.913; < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the 4 general items and their corresponding scales ranged from 0.585 to 0.670. The proportions of the highest and lowest scores of the scale were very low, suggesting a high responsiveness of the scale.

CONCLUSIONS

HFMS V1.0 has high reliability and validity for evaluating healthy fitness status of college students.

摘要

目的

评估《健康体能测量量表V1.0》(HFMS V1.0)在评估广州大学生健康体能状况方面的信效度。

方法

对584名大学生使用HFMS V1.0进行评估。从区分度、克朗巴赫α系数、分半信度、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度、校标效度和反应度等方面对HFMS V1.0量表的信效度进行评估。

结果

HFMS V1.0量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0.893,分半系数为0.909,重测系数为0.923。各维度与其子量表的相关系数在0.687至0.931之间。各条目与其维度的相关系数在0.558至0.863之间(P<0.05)。探索性因子分析显示,8个因子的方差解释率为55.105%,因子结构与量表的理论概念基本一致。验证性因子分析显示模型的拟合优度指标良好(χ2/DF = 1.952;RMSEA = 0.400;GFI = 0.906;TLI = 0.905;IFI = 0.914;CFI = 0.913;P<0.05)。4个综合条目不与其对应量表的相关系数在0.585至0.670之间。量表最高分和最低分的比例很低,表明量表具有较高的反应度。

结论

HFMS V1.0在评估大学生健康体能状况方面具有较高的信效度。

相似文献

1
[Reliability and validity of Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale (V1.0) for evaluating healthy fitness of college students in Guangzhou].[《健康体能测量量表(V1.0)用于评估广州大学生健康体能的信效度》]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Jan 30;41(1):47-54. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.06.
2
Reliability and validity of the Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale Version 1.0 (HFMS V1.0) in Chinese people.中文版健康健身测量量表 1.0 版(HFMS V1.0)的信度和效度。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 7;11(12):e048269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048269.
3
Reliability and validity of Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale Version1.0 (HFMS V1.0) in Chinese elderly people.健康体适能测量量表1.0版(HFMS V1.0)在中国老年人中的信效度研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 30;21(1):1019. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11021-2.
4
[Reliability and validity of the WeChat addiction scale in college students].[微信成瘾量表在大学生中的信效度研究]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2021 Jul;50(4):572-577. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2021.04.007.
5
Brief adult respiratory system health status scale-community version (BARSHSS-CV): developing and evaluating the reliability and validity.简易成人呼吸系统健康状况量表-社区版(BARSHSS-CV):信效度的开发与评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 3;18(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3505-z.
6
[Reliability and validity of Meaningful Life Measure-Chinese Revised in Chinese college students].[中文版大学生有意义生活量表的信效度研究]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2016 Apr 20;37(4):499-504. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2017.04.13.
7
Reliability and validity evaluation of the appropriate antibiotic use self-efficacy scale for Chinese adults.中文成年人合理使用抗生素自我效能感量表的信度和效度评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):1344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13729-1.
8
Reliability and validity of the novel self-reported spine functional scale (SSFS) in healthy participants.新型自我报告脊柱功能量表(SSFS)在健康受试者中的信度和效度。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 25;16(1):529. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02620-1.
9
[Assessment of the reliability and validity of the Sub-health Measurement Scale Version1.0].[《亚健康测评量表1.0版的信效度评定》]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2011 Jan;31(1):33-8.
10
Development of Chinese college students' perception teacher differential behavior scale and its reliability and validity test.发展中国大学生感知教师差异化行为量表及其信度和效度检验。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 12;12(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01973-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice on Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Fibrillation Screening in High-Risk Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.高危人群对心房颤动及心房颤动筛查的认知、态度和行为:一项横断面研究。
Aging Med (Milton). 2025 Jul 15;8(4):312-323. doi: 10.1002/agm2.70030. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Reliability and validity of the Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale Version 1.0 (HFMS V1.0) in Chinese people.中文版健康健身测量量表 1.0 版(HFMS V1.0)的信度和效度。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 7;11(12):e048269. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048269.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related physical fitness indicators and clustered cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents: A longitudinal study.青少年与健康相关的身体素质指标和聚集性心血管代谢危险因素:一项纵向研究。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2020 Sep;18(3):162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
2
Evaluating the social fitness Programme for older people with cognitive problems and their caregivers: lessons learned from a failed trial.评估针对认知问题老年人及其照顾者的社会适应力计划:一项失败试验的经验教训。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0927-8.
3
The 'Fit for Life' exercise programme: improving the physical health of people with a mental illness.“适合生活”运动计划:改善精神疾病患者的身体健康。
Psychol Health Med. 2019 Feb;24(2):187-192. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1530366. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely absence of disease or infirmity.健康是一种身体、精神和社会的完全良好状态,而不仅仅是没有疾病或虚弱。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 May;13(5):887. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.046. Epub 2017 Feb 3.