Suppr超能文献

[《健康体能测量量表(V1.0)用于评估广州大学生健康体能的信效度》]

[Reliability and validity of Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale (V1.0) for evaluating healthy fitness of college students in Guangzhou].

作者信息

Liu Qian, Huang Chen, Jiang Lijie, Qiu Heng, Xu Jun

机构信息

School of Health Management, Guangzhou 510515, China.

Department of Economic Management, Nanfang Hospital, Guangzhou 510515, China.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Jan 30;41(1):47-54. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.06.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reliability and validity of Healthy Fitness Measurement Scale V1.0 (HFMS V1.0) for assessing healthy fitness status of college students in Guangzhou.

METHODS

A total of 584 college students were evaluated with HFMS V1.0. The reliability and validity of HFMS V1.0 scale were assessed for its discrimination degree, Cronbach α coefficient, split-half reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, structural validity, calibration validity and responsiveness.

RESULTS

The Cronbach α of HFMS V1.0 scale was 0.893, the split-half coefficient was 0.909, and the test-retest coefficient was 0.923. The correlation coefficients of each dimension with its subscales ranged from 0.687 to 0.931. The correlation coefficient between each item and its dimension ranged from 0.558 to 0.863( < 0.05). Exploratory factor analysis showed that the variance interpretation of 8 factors was 55.105%, and the factor structure was basically identical with the theoretical concept of the scale. Confirmatory factor analysis showed excellent goodness-of-fit indices of the model (/DF= 1.952; RMSEA=0.400; GFI=0.906; TLI=0.905; IFI=0.914; and CFI=0.913; < 0.05). The correlation coefficients between the 4 general items and their corresponding scales ranged from 0.585 to 0.670. The proportions of the highest and lowest scores of the scale were very low, suggesting a high responsiveness of the scale.

CONCLUSIONS

HFMS V1.0 has high reliability and validity for evaluating healthy fitness status of college students.

摘要

目的

评估《健康体能测量量表V1.0》(HFMS V1.0)在评估广州大学生健康体能状况方面的信效度。

方法

对584名大学生使用HFMS V1.0进行评估。从区分度、克朗巴赫α系数、分半信度、重测信度、内容效度、结构效度、校标效度和反应度等方面对HFMS V1.0量表的信效度进行评估。

结果

HFMS V1.0量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0.893,分半系数为0.909,重测系数为0.923。各维度与其子量表的相关系数在0.687至0.931之间。各条目与其维度的相关系数在0.558至0.863之间(P<0.05)。探索性因子分析显示,8个因子的方差解释率为55.105%,因子结构与量表的理论概念基本一致。验证性因子分析显示模型的拟合优度指标良好(χ2/DF = 1.952;RMSEA = 0.400;GFI = 0.906;TLI = 0.905;IFI = 0.914;CFI = 0.913;P<0.05)。4个综合条目不与其对应量表的相关系数在0.585至0.670之间。量表最高分和最低分的比例很低,表明量表具有较高的反应度。

结论

HFMS V1.0在评估大学生健康体能状况方面具有较高的信效度。

相似文献

4
[Reliability and validity of the WeChat addiction scale in college students].[微信成瘾量表在大学生中的信效度研究]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2021 Jul;50(4):572-577. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2021.04.007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验