Suppr超能文献

情绪诱导对母语和第二语言中评价性词汇加工的早期神经关联有不同影响。

Mood Induction Differently Affects Early Neural Correlates of Evaluative Word Processing in L1 and L2.

作者信息

Kissler Johanna, Bromberek-Dyzman Katarzyna

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.

Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:588902. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588902. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

We investigate how mood inductions impact the neural processing of emotional adjectives in one's first language (L1) and a formally acquired second language (L2). Twenty-three student participants took part in an EEG experiment with two separate sessions. Happy or sad mood inductions were followed by series of individually presented positive, negative, or neutral adjectives in L1 (German) or L2 (English) and evaluative decisions had to be performed. Visual event-related potentials elicited during word processing were analyzed during N1 (125-200 ms), Early Posterior Negativities (EPN, 200-300 ms and 300-400 ms), N400 (350-450 ms), and the Late Positive Potential (LPP, 500-700 ms). Mood induction differentially impacted word processing already on the N1, with stronger left lateralization following happy than sad mood induction in L1, but not in L2. Moreover, regardless of language, early valence modulation was found following happy but not sad mood induction. Over occipital areas, happy mood elicited larger amplitudes of the mood-congruent positive words, whereas over temporal areas mood-incongruent negative words had higher amplitudes. In the EPN-windows, effects of mood and valence largely persisted, albeit with no difference between L1 and L2. N400 amplitude was larger for L2 than for L1. On the LPP, mood-incongruent adjectives elicited larger amplitudes than mood-congruent ones. Results reveal a remarkably early valence-general effect of mood induction on cortical processing, in line with previous reports of N1 as a first marker of contextual integration. Interestingly, this effect differed between L1 and L2. Moreover, mood-congruent effects were found in perceptual processing and mood-incongruent ERP amplification in higher-order evaluative stages.

摘要

我们研究情绪诱导如何影响一个人的母语(L1)和正式习得的第二语言(L2)中情感形容词的神经加工过程。23名学生参与者参加了一项脑电图实验,该实验分为两个独立的阶段。在诱导出快乐或悲伤情绪后,会呈现一系列单独出现的L1(德语)或L2(英语)中的积极、消极或中性形容词,参与者需要做出评价性决策。在单词加工过程中诱发的视觉事件相关电位在N1(125 - 200毫秒)、早期后负波(EPN,200 - 300毫秒和300 - 400毫秒)、N400(350 - 450毫秒)和晚期正电位(LPP,500 - 700毫秒)期间进行分析。情绪诱导在N1阶段就对单词加工产生了不同的影响,在L1中,快乐情绪诱导后的左侧化比悲伤情绪诱导更强,而在L2中则没有。此外,无论语言如何,在快乐情绪诱导后发现了早期效价调制,而悲伤情绪诱导后则没有。在枕叶区域,快乐情绪诱发了与情绪一致的积极词汇的更大振幅,而在颞叶区域,与情绪不一致的消极词汇具有更高的振幅。在EPN窗口中,情绪和效价的影响在很大程度上持续存在,尽管L1和L2之间没有差异。L2的N400振幅比L1的大。在LPP上,与情绪不一致的形容词诱发的振幅比与情绪一致的形容词更大。结果揭示了情绪诱导对皮层加工具有显著的早期效价一般效应,这与之前将N1作为情境整合的第一个标志物的报道一致。有趣的是,这种效应在L1和L2之间有所不同。此外,在感知加工中发现了情绪一致效应,在高阶评价阶段发现了情绪不一致的ERP放大效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dc4/7835133/5d921b4ce865/fpsyg-11-588902-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验