Suppr超能文献

[Not Available].

作者信息

Gross Olivia, Gagnayre Rémi, Lombrail Pierre

出版信息

Sante Publique. 2020 July-August;32(4):301-313. doi: 10.3917/spub.204.0301.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In connection with article 92 of the last Health Act, twenty-eight projects are being tested nationwide with a view to demonstrate the value of support to gain autonomy in health. These projects will be assessed on a case-by-case basis according to their specific situations. However, with the possible generalization of this type of programs, it was also necessary to assess them against the same frame of reference.

METHOD

To this end, a participatory approach was conducted with their coordinators to identify a single evaluation framework, even though these projects were very heterogeneous.

RESULTS

This development process led to the identification of a common intervention logic that made it possible, in the aftermath, to define support for autonomy in health, i.e. to set out the conditions under which a health intervention may be used. A pragmatic vision guided the production of the evaluation framework which articulates four dimensions (individual empowerment, enabling environment, collective empowerment, organizational empowerment) composed of 21 criteria and presented as inseparable.

DISCUSSION

According to this logic, the process of empowering individuals, as an objective of interventions, cannot be pursued if it is not embedded in practices that are consistent with the values inherent to the original intention. This also calls for the effects of the empowerment of supported persons to be granted as much importance as the processes of the interventions and the learning processes of individuals and organizations.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验