• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

罕见病护理伦理行动计划:参与式行动研究方法

An Ethics Action Plan for Rare Disease Care: Participatory Action Research Approach.

作者信息

Quintal Ariane, Carreau Isabelle, Grenier Annie-Danielle, Hébert Caroline, Yergeau Christine, Berthiaume Yves, Racine Eric

机构信息

Pragmatic Health Ethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Particip Med. 2023 Nov 23;15:e46607. doi: 10.2196/46607.

DOI:10.2196/46607
PMID:37995128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10704333/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Owing to their low prevalence, rare diseases are poorly addressed in the scientific literature and clinical practice guidelines. Thus, health care workers are inadequately equipped to provide timely diagnoses, appropriate treatment, and support for these poorly understood conditions. These clinical tribulations are experienced as moral challenges by patients, jeopardizing their life trajectories, dreams, and aspirations.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents an ethical action plan for rare disease care and the process underlying its development.

METHODS

This action plan was designed through an ethical inquiry conducted by the Ethics and Rare Diseases Working Group, which included 3 patient partners, 2 clinician researchers, and 1 representative from Québec's rare disease association.

RESULTS

The plan is structured into 4 components. Component A presents the key moral challenges encountered by patients, which are the lack of knowledge on rare diseases among health care workers, the problematic attitudes that it sometimes elicits, and the distress and powerlessness experienced by patients. Component B emphasizes a vision for patient partnership in rare disease care characterized by open-mindedness, empathy, respect, and support of patient autonomy from health care workers. Component C outlines 2 courses of action prompted by this vision: raising awareness among health care workers and empowering patients to better navigate their care. Component D compares several interventions that could help integrate these 2 courses of action in rare disease care.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this action plan represents a toolbox that provides a review of multiple possible interventions for policy makers, hospital managers, practitioners, researchers, and patient associations to critically reflect on key moral challenges experienced by patients with rare diseases and ways to mitigate them. This paper also prompts reflection on the values underlying rare disease care, patient experiences, and health care workers' beliefs and behaviors. Health care workers and patients were the primary beneficiaries of this action plan.

摘要

背景

由于罕见病的患病率较低,科学文献和临床实践指南对其关注不足。因此,医护人员在为这些了解甚少的病症提供及时诊断、恰当治疗和支持方面准备不足。患者将这些临床困境视为道德挑战,危及他们的人生轨迹、梦想和抱负。

目的

本文提出了一项罕见病护理的伦理行动计划及其制定过程。

方法

该行动计划是通过伦理与罕见病工作组进行的伦理调查设计而成,该工作组包括3名患者代表、2名临床研究人员以及魁北克罕见病协会的1名代表。

结果

该计划分为4个部分。A部分阐述了患者面临的关键道德挑战,即医护人员对罕见病缺乏了解、有时由此引发的问题态度以及患者所经历的痛苦和无助感。B部分强调了罕见病护理中患者伙伴关系的愿景,其特点是医护人员要有开放的心态、同理心、尊重并支持患者的自主权。C部分概述了这一愿景引发的2项行动方案:提高医护人员的认识并增强患者驾驭自身护理的能力。D部分比较了几种有助于在罕见病护理中整合这2项行动方案的干预措施。

结论

总体而言,该行动计划是一个工具箱,为政策制定者、医院管理人员、从业者、研究人员和患者协会提供了多种可能的干预措施,供其批判性地思考罕见病患者所面临的关键道德挑战以及缓解这些挑战的方法。本文还促使人们思考罕见病护理背后的价值观、患者经历以及医护人员的信念和行为。医护人员和患者是该行动计划的主要受益者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20d/10704333/51fe67d4cc58/jopm_v15i1e46607_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20d/10704333/e89785532da8/jopm_v15i1e46607_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20d/10704333/51fe67d4cc58/jopm_v15i1e46607_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20d/10704333/e89785532da8/jopm_v15i1e46607_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e20d/10704333/51fe67d4cc58/jopm_v15i1e46607_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
An Ethics Action Plan for Rare Disease Care: Participatory Action Research Approach.罕见病护理伦理行动计划:参与式行动研究方法
J Particip Med. 2023 Nov 23;15:e46607. doi: 10.2196/46607.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
Framing the issues: moral distress in health care.阐述问题:医疗保健中的道德困扰
HEC Forum. 2012 Mar;24(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9176-y.
7
Priority-setting dilemmas, moral distress and support experienced by nurses and physicians in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway.挪威 COVID-19 大流行早期护士和医生面临的优先事项设定困境、道德困境和支持。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Feb;28(1):66-81. doi: 10.1177/0969733020981748. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
8
Theory-based approach to developing an implementation plan to support the adoption of a patient decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening.基于理论的方法制定实施计划,以支持采用唐氏综合征产前筛查患者决策辅助工具。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 25;16(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01103-5.
9
Lessons from a research partnership in southwest England to understand community palliative care needs in rural, coastal and low-income communities.英格兰西南部一项研究合作项目的经验教训,旨在了解农村、沿海和低收入社区的社区姑息治疗需求。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb 28:1-40. doi: 10.3310/ATFA4287.
10
The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals.伦理反思小组在精神卫生保健中的意义:一项针对医护人员的焦点小组研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Jun 5;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0297-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing's Role in Advancing Care for Rare Genetic Diseases.护理在推进罕见遗传病护理中的作用。
Nurs Clin North Am. 2025 Jun;60(2):349-368. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2024.12.005. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Navigating challenges and opportunities in orphan medicines: A spotlight commentary on rare diseases.应对孤儿药领域的挑战与机遇:关于罕见病的聚焦评论
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr;91(4):1084-1087. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70013. Epub 2025 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Living ethics: a stance and its implications in health ethics.生命伦理学:一种立场及其在健康伦理中的意义。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Jun;27(2):137-154. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10197-9. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
Understanding Rare Disease Experiences Through the Concept of Morally Problematic Situations.通过有道德问题情境的概念理解罕见病体验。
HEC Forum. 2024 Sep;36(3):441-478. doi: 10.1007/s10730-023-09511-4. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
3
Pragmatism and Experimental Bioethics.实用主义与实验生物伦理学。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Apr;33(2):174-184. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000282. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
4
Patient journey experiences may contribute to improve healthcare for patients with rare endocrine diseases.患者就医经历可能有助于改善罕见内分泌疾病患者的医疗保健状况。
Endocr Connect. 2022 Nov 14;11(12). doi: 10.1530/EC-22-0385. Print 2022 Dec 1.
5
Developing a National Newborn Genomes Program: An Approach Driven by Ethics, Engagement and Co-design.制定国家新生儿基因组计划:一种由伦理、参与和共同设计驱动的方法。
Front Genet. 2022 May 30;13:866168. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866168. eCollection 2022.
6
Healthcare access, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life among children and adults with rare diseases.罕见病患者的医疗可及性、满意度和健康相关生活质量。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 May 12;17(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02343-4.
7
Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs.消除医疗保健中的显性和隐性偏见:证据和研究需求。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:477-501. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health-care professionals: Co-construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives.评估和促进患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的合作关系:为患者及其亲属共同构建 CADICEE 工具。
Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1230-1241. doi: 10.1111/hex.13253. Epub 2021 May 5.
9
An inductive qualitative content analysis of stigma experienced by people with rare diseases.对罕见病患者所经历的污名的归纳定性内容分析。
Psychol Health. 2022 Aug;37(8):948-963. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1912344. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
10
Implementing Anti-Racism Interventions in Healthcare Settings: A Scoping Review.在医疗保健环境中实施反种族主义干预措施:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;18(6):2993. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062993.