Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore.
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore.
Phys Ther. 2021 Jul 1;101(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab035.
This study sought to answer the following questions: What are the reference values of sensorimotor performance for fall risk in community-dwelling adults? How do population norms compare with that of other populations? Are younger adults at risk of falls?
In a cross-sectional study design, sensorimotor functions and fall risk scores of community-dwelling adults were assessed and calculated to derive corresponding fall risk categories. Reference values were determined using the average scores by age group. A total of 542 community-dwelling adults were recruited (21-90 years old) across 10-year (21-60 years) and 5-year age groups (>60 years) to obtain a representative sample of community-dwelling adults in Singapore. Five physiological domains were assessed: vision, proprioception, muscle strength, reaction time, and postural balance according to the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA). Fall risk scores and the corresponding fall risk profiles were generated from an online calculator.
Sensorimotor performance and PPA fall risk scores were significantly worse for increasing age categories. Females had significantly slower reaction time, lower muscle strength, and higher fall risk. The representative sample of older adults (≥65 years) performed poorer in postural sway (z = -0.50) and reaction time (z = -0.55), but better in proprioception (z = 0.29) and vision (z = 0.23) compared with Caucasian norms. Among younger adults (21-59 years), 36.8% appeared to exhibit higher fall risk.
This study presents important reference data and compared sensorimotor functions and physiological fall risk across age groups of community-dwelling adults in a Southeast Asian population. Poor sensorimotor performance and fall risk appear already pertinent in younger adults. Further studies are warranted to improve understanding of fall risk among younger adults.
In physical therapist practice, PPA reference values can aid clinicians in the development of targeted interventions tailored towards an individual's physiological risk profile, addressing specific physiological systems that require particular attention.
本研究旨在回答以下问题:社区居住成年人的跌倒风险的感觉运动表现的参考值是多少?与其他人群相比,人口正常值如何?年轻人有跌倒风险吗?
在一项横断面研究设计中,评估了社区居住成年人的感觉运动功能和跌倒风险评分,以得出相应的跌倒风险类别。参考值是通过按年龄组的平均分数确定的。共招募了 542 名社区居住成年人(21-90 岁),分为 10 年(21-60 岁)和 5 年年龄组(>60 岁),以获得新加坡社区居住成年人的代表性样本。根据生理概况评估(PPA)评估了五个生理领域:视力、本体感觉、肌肉力量、反应时间和姿势平衡。使用在线计算器生成跌倒风险评分和相应的跌倒风险概况。
感觉运动表现和 PPA 跌倒风险评分随年龄组的增加而显著降低。女性的反应时间明显较慢,肌肉力量较低,跌倒风险较高。代表性的老年成年人(≥65 岁)在姿势摆动(z=-0.50)和反应时间(z=-0.55)方面表现较差,但在本体感觉(z=0.29)和视力(z=0.23)方面表现较好与白种人正常值相比。在年轻成年人(21-59 岁)中,有 36.8%的人似乎有更高的跌倒风险。
本研究提供了重要的参考数据,并比较了东南亚人群中社区居住成年人各年龄段的感觉运动功能和生理跌倒风险。感觉运动表现不佳和跌倒风险似乎在年轻人中已经存在。需要进一步研究以提高对年轻成年人跌倒风险的认识。
在物理治疗师的实践中,PPA 参考值可以帮助临床医生制定针对个体生理风险概况的有针对性的干预措施,针对需要特别关注的特定生理系统。