Plunkett Roisin, Kelly Brendan D
Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24 D24 NR0A, Ireland; The National Maternity Hospital, Holles Street, Saint Peter's, Dublin D02 YH21, Ireland.
Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24 D24 NR0A, Ireland.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;75:101672. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101672. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Involuntary psychiatric inpatient care presents a unique ethical challenge not least because the dignity of a person whose liberty and autonomy are restricted is inherently at risk. Understanding patients' experience of voluntary and involuntary care is an important part of ensuring that dignity is upheld as a key value. This study aimed to provide the first thematic synthesis of the existing literature on patient experience of dignity in voluntary and involuntary inpatient psychiatric care. PubMed (United States National Library of Medicine), PsycInfo (American Psychological Association), the Cochrane Library and bibliographies of relevant articles were searched for peer-reviewed, English-language studies from the start date of the databases through May 2020. Systematic searches identified 202 original papers. Consensus criteria were used to determine study inclusion through abstract and manuscript review. Eighteen articles were initially identified as suitable and nine met criteria for the final analysis. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Given the high proportion of qualitative literature, a thematic synthesis approach was adopted. Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklists were used to assess quality of papers. Familiarization and line-by-line coding were carried out on qualitative studies and a thematic framework developed using an iterative approach. Six key themes emerged: coercion; powerlessness; care environment; relationship to staff; impact of involuntary treatment, and paradoxes. These encompassed 15 subthemes, comprising 111 individual statements. Despite dignity being at the core of this review, only five of the identified papers explicitly referenced the term. Nevertheless, core similarities in patient experiences and perspectives existed across a wide variety of primary studies from multiple sites. These themes can be taken to represent the components of dignified care and used as a framework for further research and service reform.
非自愿精神科住院护理带来了独特的伦理挑战,尤其是因为一个人的自由和自主权受到限制时,其尊严本质上就面临风险。了解患者在自愿和非自愿护理中的体验是确保将尊严作为关键价值观予以维护的重要组成部分。本研究旨在对现有关于自愿和非自愿住院精神科护理中患者尊严体验的文献进行首次主题综合分析。通过美国国立医学图书馆的PubMed、美国心理学会的PsycInfo、考科蓝图书馆以及相关文章的参考文献,检索了从各数据库起始日期至2020年5月的同行评审英文研究。系统检索共识别出202篇原始论文。通过摘要和手稿评审,使用共识标准来确定纳入研究。最初确定有18篇文章合适,9篇符合最终分析标准。本研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。鉴于定性文献比例较高,采用了主题综合方法。使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)清单来评估论文质量。对定性研究进行了熟悉和逐行编码,并采用迭代方法构建了一个主题框架。出现了六个关键主题:强制;无力感;护理环境;与工作人员的关系;非自愿治疗的影响以及悖论。这些主题包含15个子主题,由111条单独陈述组成。尽管尊严是本次综述的核心,但在所识别的论文中只有五篇明确提及了该术语。然而,来自多个地点广泛的原始研究中,患者的体验和观点存在核心相似之处。这些主题可被视为尊严护理的组成部分,并用作进一步研究和服务改革的框架。