Suppr超能文献

传统、高分辨率和成像流式细胞术:细胞外囊泡表征中的性能基准测试

Conventional, High-Resolution and Imaging Flow Cytometry: Benchmarking Performance in Characterisation of Extracellular Vesicles.

作者信息

Botha Jaco, Pugsley Haley R, Handberg Aase

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, North Denmark Region, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2021 Jan 27;9(2):124. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9020124.

Abstract

Flow cytometry remains a commonly used methodology due to its ability to characterise multiple parameters on single particles in a high-throughput manner. In order to address limitations with lacking sensitivity of conventional flow cytometry to characterise extracellular vesicles (EVs), novel, highly sensitive platforms, such as high-resolution and imaging flow cytometers, have been developed. We provided comparative benchmarks of a conventional FACS Aria III, a high-resolution Apogee A60 Micro-PLUS and the ImageStream X Mk II imaging flow cytometry platform. Nanospheres were used to systematically characterise the abilities of each platform to detect and quantify populations with different sizes, refractive indices and fluorescence properties, and the repeatability in concentration determinations was reported for each population. We evaluated the ability of the three platforms to detect different EV phenotypes in blood plasma and the intra-day, inter-day and global variabilities in determining EV concentrations. By applying this or similar methodology to characterise methods, researchers would be able to make informed decisions on choice of platforms and thereby be able to match suitable flow cytometry platforms with projects based on the needs of each individual project. This would greatly contribute to improving the robustness and reproducibility of EV studies.

摘要

流式细胞术仍然是一种常用的方法,因为它能够以高通量方式对单个颗粒的多个参数进行表征。为了解决传统流式细胞术在表征细胞外囊泡(EVs)时灵敏度不足的局限性,已经开发了新型的高灵敏度平台,如高分辨率和成像流式细胞仪。我们提供了传统的FACS Aria III、高分辨率的Apogee A60 Micro-PLUS和ImageStream X Mk II成像流式细胞术平台的比较基准。使用纳米球系统地表征每个平台检测和量化具有不同大小、折射率和荧光特性的群体的能力,并报告了每个群体浓度测定的重复性。我们评估了这三个平台检测血浆中不同EV表型的能力以及在确定EV浓度时的日内、日间和总体变异性。通过应用这种或类似的方法来表征方法,研究人员将能够就平台的选择做出明智的决定,从而能够根据每个项目的需求将合适的流式细胞术平台与项目相匹配。这将极大地有助于提高EV研究的稳健性和可重复性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4132/7911094/dd064d55d163/biomedicines-09-00124-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验