Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University in Prague, José Martího 31, 16252, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):2639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82184-6.
The purpose of the study was to compare the psychophysiological response of climbers of a range of abilities (lower grade to advanced) when ascending identical climbing routes on a climbing wall and a rotating treadwall. Twenty-two female climbers (31.2 ± 9.4 years; 60.5 ± 6.5 kg; 168.6 ± 5.7 cm) completed two identical 18 m climbing trials (graded 4 on the French Sport scale) separated by 1 week, one on the treadwall (climbing low to the ground) and the other on the indoor wall (climbing in height). Indirect calorimetry, venous blood samples and video-analysis were used to assess energy cost, hormonal response and time-load characteristics. Energy costs were higher during indoor wall climbing comparing to those on the treadwall by 16% (P < 0.001, [Formula: see text] = 0.48). No interaction of climbing ability and climbing condition were found. However, there was an interaction for climbing ability and post-climbing catecholamine concentration (P < 0.01, [Formula: see text] = 0.28). Advanced climbers' catecholamine response increased by 238% and 166% with respect to pre-climb values on the treadwall and indoor wall, respectively; while lower grade climbers pre-climb concentrations were elevated by 281% and 376% on the treadwall and indoor wall, respectively. The video analysis showed no differences in any time-motion variables between treadwall and indoor wall climbing. The study demonstrated a greater metabolic response for indoor wall climbing, however, the exact mechanisms are not yet fully understood.
这项研究的目的是比较不同能力水平(低级别到高级别)的攀岩者在攀登相同的攀爬路线时的心理生理反应,这些路线分别位于攀岩墙上和旋转梯面上。22 名女性攀岩者(31.2±9.4 岁;60.5±6.5kg;168.6±5.7cm)在 1 周内完成了两次相同的 18 米攀爬测试(法国运动量表的 4 级),一次在梯面上(靠近地面攀爬),另一次在室内墙上(高空攀爬)。使用间接测热法、静脉血样和视频分析来评估能量消耗、激素反应和时间负荷特征。与在梯面上相比,在室内墙上攀爬时能量消耗高出 16%(P<0.001,[公式:见文本] = 0.48)。未发现攀爬能力和攀爬条件的交互作用。然而,在攀爬能力和攀爬后儿茶酚胺浓度之间存在交互作用(P<0.01,[公式:见文本] = 0.28)。高级攀岩者的儿茶酚胺反应在梯面和室内墙上分别增加了 238%和 166%,而低级别攀岩者的儿茶酚胺浓度在梯面和室内墙上分别增加了 281%和 376%。视频分析显示,在梯面和室内墙上攀爬时,任何时间运动变量都没有差异。研究表明,室内墙攀爬的代谢反应更大,但确切的机制尚不完全清楚。