Suppr超能文献

大型学术医院中ABO和D血型不匹配受血者输注O型红细胞的使用模式

Utilisation patterns of group O red blood cell transfusion by ABO and D non-identical recipients in large academic hospital.

作者信息

Liker M, Lukać I K, Burnać I L, Bojanić I, Raos M, Ćepulić B G

机构信息

Clinical Department of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation biology, University Hospital Centre of Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia.

General Hospital of Gospić, Gospić, Croatia.

出版信息

Transfus Clin Biol. 2021 May;28(2):186-190. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several studies have raised concerns that transfusion of O red blood cells (RBCs) to ABO and D non-identical recipients can intensify group O inventory shortages. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse particular clinical indications and polices responsible for O RBCs use by ABO and D non-identical recipients, as well as to assess the impact of this practice on the overall utilisation of O RBCs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data of all transfused RBCs from 2014 to 2018 were extracted from the comprehensive database of transfusion service. Extracted variables included date of transfusion, ABO and D group of the transfused RBCs and recipients, recipient's demographic, and specific characteristics regarding transfusion requirements.

RESULTS

Over a 5-year period, 124,220 RBCs were transfused: 38,962 (31.4%) group O D+ and 9109 (7.3%) group O D-. ABO and D non-identical recipient received 4842 (10.1%) of all administered O RBCs: 2880 (7.4%) of all transfused O D+ and 1962 (21.5%) of all transfused O D- RBCs. The common indications for this practice were: ABO and D mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) (52.5%), infants under the age of 4 months (18.6%), shortage of ABO identical RBCs (9.0%), phenotype-matched RBCs (8,1%), and urgent transfusion (7.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of O RBCs was transfused to ABO and D non-identical recipients, mainly due to transfusion of ABO and D mismatched HSCT recipients. However, the proportion of all transfused RBCs O D+ and especially O D- remained relatively low.

摘要

目的

多项研究引发了人们对向ABO和D血型不匹配的受血者输注O型红细胞(RBC)会加剧O型血库存短缺的担忧。本研究的目的是回顾性分析ABO和D血型不匹配的受血者使用O型RBC的特定临床指征和政策,并评估这种做法对O型RBC总体使用情况的影响。

材料与方法

从输血服务综合数据库中提取2014年至2018年所有输注RBC的数据。提取的变量包括输血日期、输注RBC和受血者的ABO和D血型、受血者的人口统计学信息以及输血需求的具体特征。

结果

在5年期间,共输注了124,220个RBC:38,962个(31.4%)O型D阳性和9109个(7.3%)O型D阴性。ABO和D血型不匹配的受血者接受了所有输注的O型RBC中的4842个(10.1%):所有输注的O型D阳性中的2880个(7.4%)和所有输注的O型D阴性RBC中的1962个(21.5%)。这种做法的常见指征为:ABO和D血型不匹配的造血干细胞移植(HSCT)(52.5%)、4个月以下婴儿(18.6%)、ABO血型相同的RBC短缺(9.0%)、表型匹配的RBC(8.1%)以及紧急输血(7.2%)。

结论

相当一部分O型RBC被输注给了ABO和D血型不匹配的受血者,主要原因是ABO和D血型不匹配的HSCT受血者的输血。然而,所有输注的RBC中O型D阳性尤其是O型D阴性的比例仍然相对较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验