• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对法国、比利时和加拿大针对新冠疫情所采取政策措施的分析。

An analysis of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Belgium, and Canada.

作者信息

Desson Zachary, Weller Emmi, McMeekin Peter, Ammi Mehdi

机构信息

Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

University of Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):430-446. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.002
PMID:33520640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7832234/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper presents an overview and comparative analysis of the epidemiological situation and the policy responses in France, Belgium, and Canada during the early stages of the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic (Feb.-Aug. 2020). These three countries are compared because they represent a spectrum of different governance structures while also being OECD nations that are similar in many other respects.

METHODS

A rapid review of primary data from the three countries was conducted. Data was collected from official government documents whenever possible, supplemented by information from international databases and local media reports. The data was then analysed to identify common patterns as well as significant divergences across the three countries, especially in the areas of health policy and technology use.

RESULTS

France, Belgium and Canada faced differing epidemiological situations during the Covid-19 pandemic, and the wide variety of policy actions taken appears to be linked to existing governance and healthcare structures. The varying degrees of federalism and regional autonomy across the three countries highlight the different constraints faced by national policy-makers within different governance models.

CONCLUSIONS

The actions taken by all three countries appear to have been largely dictated by existing health system capacity, with increasing federalism associated with more fragmented strategies and less coordination across jurisdictions. However, the implications of certain policies related to economic resilience and health system capacity cannot yet be fully evaluated and may even prove to have net negative impacts into the future.

摘要

目标

本文概述并比较分析了法国、比利时和加拿大在2020年新冠疫情早期阶段(2020年2月至8月)的疫情形势及政策应对措施。对这三个国家进行比较是因为它们代表了不同的治理结构类型,同时作为经合组织国家,在许多其他方面也具有相似性。

方法

对来自这三个国家的原始数据进行了快速审查。数据尽可能从政府官方文件中收集,并辅以国际数据库和当地媒体报道的信息。然后对数据进行分析,以确定三国之间的共同模式以及显著差异,特别是在卫生政策和技术应用领域。

结果

法国、比利时和加拿大在新冠疫情期间面临不同的疫情形势,所采取的各种政策行动似乎与现有的治理和医疗结构有关。三国不同程度的联邦制和地区自治突出了不同治理模式下国家政策制定者面临的不同制约因素。

结论

这三个国家采取的行动似乎在很大程度上取决于现有的卫生系统能力,联邦制程度越高,战略越分散,跨辖区的协调越少。然而,某些与经济复原力和卫生系统能力相关政策的影响尚未得到充分评估,甚至可能在未来被证明具有净负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/eaaf58dfaf6f/gr12_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/0a7f7d6cc17c/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/e5ce2fe0d62a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/b3e085e1eb07/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/d91df545a599/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/298ad2c5c5b7/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/327101b2b3b6/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/18b2811e69e8/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/0b7e9d45830b/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/9554edf5fb06/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/2e98e65e3315/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/7a7e2847f9cc/gr11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/eaaf58dfaf6f/gr12_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/0a7f7d6cc17c/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/e5ce2fe0d62a/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/b3e085e1eb07/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/d91df545a599/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/298ad2c5c5b7/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/327101b2b3b6/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/18b2811e69e8/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/0b7e9d45830b/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/9554edf5fb06/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/2e98e65e3315/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/7a7e2847f9cc/gr11_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f36c/7832234/eaaf58dfaf6f/gr12_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
An analysis of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Belgium, and Canada.对法国、比利时和加拿大针对新冠疫情所采取政策措施的分析。
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):430-446. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
2
Europe's Covid-19 outliers: German, Austrian and Swiss policy responses during the early stages of the 2020 pandemic.欧洲的新冠疫情异类:2020年疫情初期德国、奥地利和瑞士的政策应对措施
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):405-418. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
3
An analysis of the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns in France, Israel, Italy and Spain and their impact on health and economic outcomes.对法国、以色列、意大利和西班牙的新冠疫苗接种运动及其对健康和经济成果的影响进行的分析。
Health Policy Technol. 2022 Jun;11(2):100594. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100594. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Everyday capabilities were a path to resilience during COVID-19: a case study of five countries.日常能力是应对 COVID-19 期间韧性的途径:五个国家的案例研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):192-204. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac085.
6
A comparative analysis of the effects of containment policies on the epidemiological manifestation of the COVID-19 pandemic across nine European countries.九国防疫政策对 COVID-19 大流行的流行病学表现影响的对比分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 19;13(1):11631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37751-4.
7
Oxygen and Mortality in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Comparative Analysis of Supplemental Oxygen Policies and Health Outcomes Across 26 Countries.COVID-19 肺炎中的氧气与死亡率:26 个国家补充氧气政策与健康结果的比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 13;9:580585. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.580585. eCollection 2021.
8
Global Health System Resilience during Encounters with Stressors - Lessons Learnt from Cancer Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic.全球卫生系统应对压力源的韧性 - 从 COVID-19 大流行期间的癌症服务中吸取的经验教训。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023 Apr;35(4):e289-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
High politics in the Low Countries: COVID-19 and the politics of strained multi-level policy cooperation in Belgium and the Netherlands.低地国家的高层政治:新冠疫情与比利时和荷兰多层次政策合作紧张局势下的政治
Eur Policy Anal. 2020 Dec;6(2):305-317. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1101. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Change in prevalence of smoking during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic among middle-aged and older adults in Canada: a cohort study of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.加拿大中老年人在新冠疫情大流行第一年的吸烟流行率变化:加拿大老龄化纵向研究的队列研究
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;2(2):e001175. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001175. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Outcomes of Preterm Infants Admitted to Canadian NICUs Before and During the SARS-COV Pandemic.加拿大新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒(SARS-CoV)大流行之前及期间收治的早产儿的结局
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;12(2):193. doi: 10.3390/children12020193.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Standardising policy and technology responses in the immediate aftermath of a pandemic: a comparative and conceptual framework.大流行后立即采取标准化的政策和技术应对措施:比较和概念框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jan 25;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00951-x.
2
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. elusive consensus: 极化的精英沟通在新冠大流行中
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717. eCollection 2020 Jul.
3
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.
Analysis of Information and Health Literacy Policies in Pandemics: A Case Study of COVID-19.
大流行期间信息与健康素养政策分析:以新冠疫情为例
J Caring Sci. 2024 Nov 17;13(4):218-228. doi: 10.34172/jcs.33432. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Responding to COVID-19: an exploration of EU country responses and directions for further research.应对 COVID-19:对欧盟国家应对措施及进一步研究方向的探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1198. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11671-z.
5
Evaluation study of the urban governance of the COVID-19 crisis in the city of Antwerp.评估安特卫普市应对 COVID-19 危机的城市治理研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):2117. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19569-5.
6
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of restraint and seclusion interventions in Ontario emergency departments: A population-based study.新冠疫情对安大略省急诊部门约束和隔离干预措施使用的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0302164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302164. eCollection 2024.
7
The COVID-19 green certificate's effect on vaccine uptake in French and Italian regions.新冠病毒绿色通行证对法国和意大利各地区疫苗接种率的影响。
J Policy Model. 2023 Jun 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2023.06.005.
8
Portrait of French-speaking minorities with respect to vaccination against COVID-19.法语少数群体在新冠疫苗接种方面的情况
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2023 Aug 1;49(7-8):320-330. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v49i78a04.
9
Lessons learned from the Alberta Border Testing Pilot Program.从艾伯塔省边境检测试点项目中吸取的经验教训。
Front Health Serv. 2023 Nov 24;3:1220027. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1220027. eCollection 2023.
10
Real-time forecasting of COVID-19 spread according to protective behavior and vaccination: autoregressive integrated moving average models.根据防护行为和疫苗接种情况实时预测 COVID-19 传播:自回归积分移动平均模型。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 8;23(1):1500. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16419-8.
估算非药物干预措施对欧洲 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
Commentary on Ferguson, et al., "Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand".评 Ferguson 等人的“减少 COVID-19 死亡率和医疗需求的非药物干预(NPIs)的影响”一文。
Bull Math Biol. 2020 Apr 8;82(4):52. doi: 10.1007/s11538-020-00726-x.
5
Canada and COVID-19: learning from SARS.加拿大与新冠疫情:借鉴非典经验
Lancet. 2020 Mar 21;395(10228):936-937. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30670-X.
6
Critical care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study.加拿大的重症监护能力:一项全国性横断面研究的结果。
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 1;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0852-6.