Nature-based Solutions Initiative, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Apr;27(8):1518-1546. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15513. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Nature-based solutions (NbS)-solutions to societal challenges that involve working with nature-have recently gained popularity as an integrated approach that can address climate change and biodiversity loss, while supporting sustainable development. Although well-designed NbS can deliver multiple benefits for people and nature, much of the recent limelight has been on tree planting for carbon sequestration. There are serious concerns that this is distracting from the need to rapidly phase out use of fossil fuels and protect existing intact ecosystems. There are also concerns that the expansion of forestry framed as a climate change mitigation solution is coming at the cost of carbon rich and biodiverse native ecosystems and local resource rights. Here, we discuss the promise and pitfalls of the NbS framing and its current political traction, and we present recommendations on how to get the message right. We urge policymakers, practitioners and researchers to consider the synergies and trade-offs associated with NbS and to follow four guiding principles to enable NbS to provide sustainable benefits to society: (1) NbS are not a substitute for the rapid phase out of fossil fuels; (2) NbS involve a wide range of ecosystems on land and in the sea, not just forests; (3) NbS are implemented with the full engagement and consent of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in a way that respects their cultural and ecological rights; and (4) NbS should be explicitly designed to provide measurable benefits for biodiversity. Only by following these guidelines will we design robust and resilient NbS that address the urgent challenges of climate change and biodiversity loss, sustaining nature and people together, now and into the future.
基于自然的解决方案(NbS)——涉及与自然合作以解决社会挑战的解决方案——最近作为一种能够应对气候变化和生物多样性丧失同时支持可持续发展的综合方法而受到关注。虽然设计良好的 NbS 可以为人类和自然带来多种益处,但最近的大部分关注焦点都集中在植树固碳上。人们严重担心这会分散人们对迅速淘汰化石燃料和保护现有完整生态系统的需求。此外,人们还担心,将林业扩张作为缓解气候变化的解决方案,是以牺牲富含碳和生物多样性的本地生态系统和当地资源权利为代价的。在这里,我们讨论了 NbS 框架的承诺和陷阱及其当前的政治吸引力,并就如何正确传达信息提出了建议。我们敦促政策制定者、实践者和研究人员考虑与 NbS 相关的协同作用和权衡取舍,并遵循四项指导原则,使 NbS 能够为社会提供可持续的利益:(1)NbS 不能替代迅速淘汰化石燃料;(2)NbS 涉及陆地和海洋上的各种生态系统,而不仅仅是森林;(3)NbS 的实施应充分考虑到土著人民和当地社区的参与和同意,并尊重其文化和生态权利;(4)NbS 应明确设计为生物多样性提供可衡量的利益。只有遵循这些准则,我们才能设计出稳健且具有弹性的 NbS,以应对气候变化和生物多样性丧失的紧迫挑战,共同维持自然和人类的可持续发展。