Suppr超能文献

评估基于自然的解决方案以实现气候缓解和保护需要全面的碳核算。

Evaluating nature-based solutions for climate mitigation and conservation requires comprehensive carbon accounting.

机构信息

Griffith Climate Change Response Program, Griffith University, Queensland 4222, Australia.

Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, ACT 0200, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144341. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144341. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Abstract

Nature-based solutions (NbS) can address climate change, biodiversity loss, human well-being and their interactions in an integrated way. A major barrier to achieving this is the lack of comprehensiveness in current carbon accounting which has focused on flows rather than stocks of carbon and led to perverse outcomes. We propose a new comprehensive approach to carbon accounting based on the whole carbon cycle, covering both stocks and flows, and linking changes due to human activities with responses in the biosphere and atmosphere. We identify enhancements to accounting, namely; inclusion of all carbon reservoirs, changes in their condition and stability, disaggregated flows, and coverage of all land areas. This comprehensive approach recognises that both carbon stocks (as storage) and carbon flows (as sequestration) contribute to the ecosystem service of global climate regulation. In contrast, current ecosystem services measurement and accounting commonly use only carbon sequestration measured as net flows, while greenhouse gas inventories use flows from sources to sinks. This flow-based accounting has incentivised planting and maintaining young forests with high carbon uptake rates, resulting, perversely, in failing to reveal the greater mitigation benefit from protecting larger, more stable and resilient carbon stocks in natural forests. We demonstrate the benefits of carbon storage and sequestration for climate mitigation, in theory as ecosystem services within an ecosystem accounting framework, and in practice using field data that reveals differences in results between accounting for stocks or flows. Our proposed holistic and comprehensive carbon accounting makes transparent the benefits, trade-offs and shortcomings of NbS actions for climate mitigation and sustainability outcomes. Adopting this approach is imperative for revision of ecosystem accounting systems under the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting and contributing to evidence-based decision-making for international conventions on climate (UNFCCC), biodiversity (CBD) and sustainability (SDGs).

摘要

基于自然的解决方案(NbS)可以综合应对气候变化、生物多样性丧失、人类福祉及其相互作用。实现这一目标的主要障碍是当前碳核算方法的不全面性,这种方法侧重于碳的流动而不是存量,导致了适得其反的结果。我们提出了一种新的基于整个碳循环的全面碳核算方法,涵盖了存量和流量,并将人类活动引起的变化与生物圈和大气中的响应联系起来。我们确定了核算方法的增强措施,即包括所有碳库、其状况和稳定性变化、细分的流动以及所有土地面积的覆盖。这种全面的方法认识到碳存量(作为储存)和碳流动(作为固存)都有助于全球气候调节这一生态系统服务。相比之下,当前的生态系统服务测量和核算通常只使用作为净流动测量的碳固存,而温室气体清单则使用从源到汇的流动。这种基于流动的核算方法鼓励种植和维护具有高碳吸收率的年轻森林,结果适得其反,未能揭示出保护自然森林中更大、更稳定和更有弹性的碳储量所带来的更大缓解效益。我们展示了碳储存和固存对气候缓解的好处,从理论上作为生态系统核算框架内的生态系统服务,从实践上使用实地数据揭示了存量或流量核算之间的结果差异。我们提出的全面和综合的碳核算方法使 NbS 行动在气候缓解和可持续性方面的效益、权衡和缺点变得透明。在环境-经济核算系统下修订生态系统核算系统并为有关气候变化(UNFCCC)、生物多样性(CBD)和可持续性(SDGs)的国际公约提供基于证据的决策,采用这种方法至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验