• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会抽样:儿童跟踪社会选择以推理社会等级制度。

Social sampling: Children track social choices to reason about status hierarchies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.

Department of Human Development, Cornell University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Aug;150(8):1673-1687. doi: 10.1037/xge0001008. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001008
PMID:33523688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8325718/
Abstract

We tested whether preschool-aged children (N = 280) track an agents' choices of individuals from novel social groups (i.e., social choices) to infer an agent's social preferences and the social status of the groups. Across experiments, children saw a box containing 2 groups (red and blue toy cats). In Experiment 1, children were randomly assigned to Social Selection in which items were described as "friends," or to Object Selection in which items were described as "toys." Within each selection type, the agent selected 5 items from either a numerically common group (82% of box; selections appearing random) or a numerically rare group (18% of box; selections violating random sampling). After watching these selections, children were asked who the agent would play with among 3 individuals: 1 from the selected group, 1 from the unselected group, or 1 from a novel group. Only participants who viewed Social Selection of a numerically rare group predicted that the agent would select an individual from that group in the future. These participants also said an individual from the selected group was the "leader." Subsequent experiments further probed the Social Selection findings. Children's reasoning depended on the agent actively selecting the friends (Experiment 2), and children thought a member of the rare selected group was the leader, but not the "helper" (Experiment 3). These results illustrate that children track an agent's positive social choices to reason about that agent's social preferences and to infer the status (likelihood of being a leader) of novel social groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们测试了学龄前儿童(N=280)是否会根据代理人对来自新社交群体的个体的选择(即社会选择)来跟踪推断代理人的社会偏好和群体的社会地位。在各项实验中,孩子们看到一个盒子里装着 2 个群体(红色和蓝色玩具猫)。在实验 1 中,孩子们被随机分配到社会选择组或物体选择组。在每种选择类型中,代理人从数量较多的群体(82%的盒子;选择似乎是随机的)或数量较少的群体(18%的盒子;选择违反随机抽样)中选择 5 个物品。观看这些选择后,孩子们被问到代理人会和 3 个人中的谁一起玩:从选中的群体中选择 1 人,从未选中的群体中选择 1 人,或者从一个新群体中选择 1 人。只有观看了数量较少的群体的社会选择的参与者才会预测代理人将来会从该群体中选择一个人。这些参与者还表示,选中群体中的一个人是“领袖”。随后的实验进一步探讨了社会选择的发现。儿童的推理取决于代理人主动选择朋友(实验 2),而且儿童认为,选中的稀有群体的成员是领袖,而不是“助手”(实验 3)。这些结果表明,儿童会根据代理人的积极社会选择来推断该代理人的社会偏好,并推断新社交群体的地位(成为领袖的可能性)。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/f411abc21b28/nihms-1724063-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/345f1f733947/nihms-1724063-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/e2e976e369b5/nihms-1724063-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/33794006b522/nihms-1724063-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/dca8114b9094/nihms-1724063-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/608f19900eed/nihms-1724063-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/f411abc21b28/nihms-1724063-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/345f1f733947/nihms-1724063-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/e2e976e369b5/nihms-1724063-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/33794006b522/nihms-1724063-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/dca8114b9094/nihms-1724063-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/608f19900eed/nihms-1724063-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e05/8325718/f411abc21b28/nihms-1724063-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Social sampling: Children track social choices to reason about status hierarchies.社会抽样:儿童跟踪社会选择以推理社会等级制度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Aug;150(8):1673-1687. doi: 10.1037/xge0001008. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
Building representations of the social world: Children extract patterns from social choices to reason about multi-group hierarchies.构建社会世界的表征:儿童从社会选择中提取模式,以推理多群体层级关系。
Dev Sci. 2023 Jul;26(4):e13366. doi: 10.1111/desc.13366. Epub 2023 Feb 5.
3
Young children infer preferences from a single action, but not if it is constrained.幼儿会从单一行为中推断偏好,但如果该行为受到限制则不会。
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:168-175. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
4
Children's Gender-Typed Toy Interests: Does Propulsion Matter?儿童对性别典型玩具的兴趣:推进力重要吗?
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jul;46(5):1295-1305. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0901-5. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
5
If you don't want it, neither do I: Social influences on children's choices.如果你不想要它,我也不想要:社会对儿童选择的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
6
Children reason about shared preferences.儿童会推理共同偏好。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;46(2):299-309. doi: 10.1037/a0018539.
7
Young children use statistical sampling to infer the preferences of other people.幼儿会使用统计抽样来推断其他人的偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Aug;21(8):1134-40. doi: 10.1177/0956797610376652. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
8
Desire to play with counterstereotypical peers is related to gender stereotypes and playmate experiences.与反刻板印象同伴玩耍的愿望与性别刻板印象和玩伴经历有关。
Dev Psychol. 2022 Mar;58(3):510-521. doi: 10.1037/dev0001269. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
Is it personal or is it social? The interaction of knowledge domain and statistical evidence in U.S. and Chinese preschoolers' social generalizations.是个人因素还是社会因素?美中两国学龄前儿童社会推理中知识领域和统计证据的相互作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Jul;153(7):1887-1903. doi: 10.1037/xge0001605. Epub 2024 May 2.
10
The nonmeek inherit the earth: Children generalize dominance, but not submissiveness.桀骜不驯者得天下:儿童能够概括出支配和顺从,但不能概括出服从。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Jul;60(7):1187-1202. doi: 10.1037/dev0001696. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Who Peeked? Children Infer the Likely Cause of Improbable Success.谁在偷看?儿童推断出不太可能成功的可能原因。
Dev Sci. 2025 Jan;28(1):e13598. doi: 10.1111/desc.13598.
2
Calculated Feelings: How Children Use Probability to Infer Emotions.计算出来的情感:儿童如何运用概率来推断情绪。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Oct 27;7:879-893. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00111. eCollection 2023.
3
Distrust as a form of inequality.不信任是不平等的一种形式。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 19;13(1):9901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36948-x.
4
Imagination and social cognition in childhood.儿童的想象力和社会认知
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Jul;13(4):e1603. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1603. Epub 2022 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The psychology of American racism.美国种族主义心理学。
Am Psychol. 2021 Apr;76(3):475-487. doi: 10.1037/amp0000642. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
Children's use of race and gender as cues to social status.儿童使用种族和性别作为社会地位的线索。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0234398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234398. eCollection 2020.
3
The Development of Intersectional Social Prototypes.交叉社会原型的发展。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Aug;31(8):911-926. doi: 10.1177/0956797620920360. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
4
Acquiring group bias: Observing other people's nonverbal signals can create social group biases.获得群体偏见:观察他人的非言语信号会产生社会群体偏见。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;119(4):824-838. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000218. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
5
Teachers' nonverbal behaviors influence children's stereotypic beliefs.教师的非言语行为影响儿童的刻板印象信念。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Dec;188:104671. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104671. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
6
Bias at the intersection of race and gender: Evidence from preschool-aged children.种族和性别交叉处的偏见:来自学龄前儿童的证据。
Dev Sci. 2019 May;22(3):e12788. doi: 10.1111/desc.12788. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
7
Children's developing judgments about the physical manifestations of power.儿童对权力的物理表现的发展判断。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Apr;55(4):793-808. doi: 10.1037/dev0000657. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
8
Children Use Nonverbal Cues from an Adult to Evaluate Peers.儿童利用来自成人的非语言线索来评估同龄人。
J Cogn Dev. 2018;19(2):121-136. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2018.1449749. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Asking Children to "Be Helpers" Can Backfire After Setbacks.让孩子“帮忙”可能会在挫折后适得其反。
Child Dev. 2020 Jan;91(1):236-248. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13147. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
Infants distinguish between leaders and bullies.婴儿能区分领导者和霸凌者。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 18;115(38):E8835-E8843. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801677115. Epub 2018 Sep 4.