• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加阿片类药物的医疗可及性如何导致阿片类药物流行:来自医疗保险处方药部分的证据。

How increasing medical access to opioids contributes to the opioid epidemic: Evidence from Medicare Part D.

机构信息

RAND, Arlington, VA 22202, United States.

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102286. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102286. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102286
PMID:32193022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231644/
Abstract

Drug overdoses involving opioid analgesics have increased dramatically since 1999, representing one of the United States' top public health crises. Opioids have legitimate medical functions, but they are often diverted, suggesting a tradeoff between improving medical access and nonmedical abuse. We provide causal estimates of the relationship between the medical opioid supply and drug overdoses using Medicare Part D as a differential shock to the geographic distribution of opioids. Our estimates imply that a 10% increase in opioid medical supply leads to a 7.1% increase in opioid-related deaths among the Medicare-ineligible population, suggesting substantial diversion from medical markets.

摘要

自 1999 年以来,涉及阿片类镇痛药的药物过量急剧增加,这是美国最严重的公共卫生危机之一。阿片类药物具有合法的医疗功能,但它们经常被转移,这表明在改善医疗服务获取和非医疗滥用之间存在权衡。我们利用医疗保险处方药计划(Medicare Part D)作为阿片类药物地理分布的差异冲击,提供了医疗用阿片类供应与药物过量之间关系的因果估计。我们的估计表明,医疗用阿片类供应增加 10%,会导致医疗保险不覆盖人群中与阿片类相关的死亡人数增加 7.1%,这表明大量阿片类药物从医疗市场转移。

相似文献

1
How increasing medical access to opioids contributes to the opioid epidemic: Evidence from Medicare Part D.增加阿片类药物的医疗可及性如何导致阿片类药物流行:来自医疗保险处方药部分的证据。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102286. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102286. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Estimating naloxone need in the USA across fentanyl, heroin, and prescription opioid epidemics: a modelling study.估算美国在芬太尼、海洛因和处方类阿片流行期间的纳洛酮需求:一项建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e210-e218. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00304-2. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
3
Polydrug epidemiology: Benzodiazepine prescribing and the drug overdose epidemic in the United States.多药流行病学:美国苯二氮䓬类药物的处方开具与药物过量流行情况
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 May;27(5):541-549. doi: 10.1002/pds.4417. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
4
Fourth Wave of Opioid (Illicit Drug) Overdose Deaths and Diminishing Access to Prescription Opioids and Interventional Techniques: Cause and Effect.阿片类药物(非法药物)过量死亡的第四波高峰以及处方阿片类药物和介入技术可及性的下降:因果关系
Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):97-124.
5
Exposure-Response Association Between Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use and Risk of Opioid-Related Overdose in Medicare Part D Beneficiaries.在医疗保险处方药受益人群中,同时使用阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物与阿片类药物相关过量风险之间的暴露-反应关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0919.
6
Political frames of public health crises: Discussing the opioid epidemic in the US Congress.公共卫生危机的政治框架:在美国国会讨论阿片类药物流行问题。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jul;281:114087. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114087. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Systematic Evaluation of State Policy Interventions Targeting the US Opioid Epidemic, 2007-2018.系统评价针对美国阿片类药物流行的国家政策干预措施,2007-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036687. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36687.
8
Opioids with abuse-deterrent properties: A regulatory and technological overview.具有滥用威慑特性的阿片类药物:监管与技术概述。
J Opioid Manag. 2017 Nov/Dec;13(6):397-413. doi: 10.5055/jom.2017.0417.
9
A crisis in my community? Local-level awareness of the opioid epidemic and political consequences.社区危机?地方层面的阿片类药物流行意识及其政治后果。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114497. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114497. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
10
Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths--United States, 2000-2014.药物和阿片类药物过量死亡人数增加 - 美国,2000-2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jan 1;64(50-51):1378-82. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the demographics of the opioid overdose death crisis.了解阿片类药物过量致死危机的人口统计学特征。
J Popul Econ. 2025;38(3):54. doi: 10.1007/s00148-025-01108-0. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Opioid Dose Reduction Vis-à-Vis Lumbar Medial Branch Intervention.与腰椎内侧支干预相关的阿片类药物剂量减少
Cureus. 2025 May 16;17(5):e84229. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84229. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Estimating price elasticities of demand for pain relief drugs: evidence from Medicare Part D.估算止痛药物需求的价格弹性:来自医疗保险处方药部分的证据。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2024 Dec;24(4):481-515. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09382-3. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
4
Development of a Medical Device in Response to a Fatal Self-Injection of Non-prescribed Opioids: A Case Report.应对非处方阿片类药物致命自我注射事件开发的一款医疗设备:病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Mar 25;16(3):e56869. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56869. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Risk factors for opioid addiction in chronic non-cancer pain.慢性非癌性疼痛中阿片类药物成瘾的危险因素。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 4;9(9):e19707. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19707. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Enhanced recovery protocol after cesarean delivery: impact on opioid use and pain perception.剖宫产术后的强化康复方案:对阿片类药物使用及疼痛感知的影响
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 May 6;3(3):100220. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100220. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Enumerating contributions of fentanyls and other factors to the unprecedented 2020 rise in opioid overdose deaths: model-based analysis.探究芬太尼及其他因素对2020年阿片类药物过量致死人数空前增长的影响:基于模型的分析
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Mar 3;2(4):pgad064. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad064. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Do opioid prescriptions lead to fatal car crashes?阿片类药物处方会导致致命车祸吗?
Am J Health Econ. 2022 Summer;8(3):359-386. doi: 10.1086/718511. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
9
Assessment of opioid administration patterns following lower extremity fracture among opioid-naïve inpatients: retrospective multicenter cohort study.评估下肢骨折的阿片类药物初治住院患者的阿片类药物给药模式:回顾性多中心队列研究。
Ann Saudi Med. 2022 Nov-Dec;42(6):366-376. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2022.366. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
10
ORIGINS OF THE OPIOID CRISIS AND ITS ENDURING IMPACTS.阿片类药物危机的起源及其持久影响。
Q J Econ. 2022 May;137(2):1139-1179. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab043. Epub 2021 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescription Drug Advertising and Drug Utilization: The Role of Medicare Part D.处方药广告与药物利用:医疗保险D部分的作用
J Public Econ. 2023 May;221. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104860. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
2
Supply-Side Drug Policy in the Presence of Substitutes: Evidence from the Introduction of Abuse-Deterrent Opioids.存在替代品时的供应方毒品政策:来自引入抗滥用阿片类药物的证据。
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2018 Nov;10(4):1-35. doi: 10.1257/pol.20170082.
3
Association of Opioid Overdose With Opioid Prescriptions to Family Members.阿片类药物过量与向家庭成员开具阿片类药物处方的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Sep 1;179(9):1186-1192. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1064.
4
The Effect of Public Insurance Expansions on Substance Use Disorder Treatment: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act.《平价医疗法案对物质使用障碍治疗的影响》。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2019;38(2):366-93.
5
Drivers of the fatal drug epidemic.致命毒品泛滥的根源。
J Health Econ. 2019 Mar;64:25-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Deaths - United States, 2013-2017.药物和阿片类药物滥用相关的过量死亡-美国,2013-2017 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 4;67(5152):1419-1427. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm675152e1.
7
Trends in Medical Use of Opioids in the U.S., 2006-2016.美国 2006-2016 年阿片类药物医疗使用趋势。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5):652-660. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.034. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
The Effect of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Prices and Utilization.医疗保险处方药计划(Medicare Part D)对药品价格和使用的影响。
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar;100(1):590-607. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.1.590.
9
Do medical marijuana laws reduce addictions and deaths related to pain killers?医用大麻合法化是否能减少与止痛药相关的成瘾和死亡?
J Health Econ. 2018 Mar;58:29-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Tobacco Regulation and Cost-Benefit Analysis: How Should We Value Foregone Consumer Surplus?烟草管制与成本效益分析:我们应如何评估放弃的消费者剩余价值?
Am J Health Econ. 2018 Winter;4(1):1-25. doi: 10.1162/ajhe_a_00091. Epub 2018 Jan 23.