J Nurs Educ. 2021 Feb 1;60(2):65-66. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20210120-02.
A cursory look at the measurement practices in the Journal of Nursing Education revealed several deficits that our community is encouraged to address. In 2020, a little less than half of our quantitative studies did not provide reliability estimates from their own data, opting instead to provide estimates reported in the literature or none at all. Of the studies that did supply estimates using their data, only Cronbach's alpha was reported. Unfortunately, limitations with Cronbach's alpha and inconsistent reporting practices are likely undermining the science of nursing education. Researchers are encouraged to estimate reliability using their own data with increasingly valid techniques. [J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):65-66.].
粗略观察《护理教育杂志》的测量实践，发现了一些我们鼓励社区解决的缺陷。2020 年，我们不到一半的定量研究没有提供来自其自身数据的可靠性估计值，而是选择提供文献中报告的估计值，或者根本不提供。在提供使用其数据进行估计的研究中，仅报告了克朗巴赫的阿尔法。不幸的是，克朗巴赫的阿尔法的局限性和不一致的报告做法可能会破坏护理教育科学。鼓励研究人员使用他们自己的数据，采用越来越有效的技术来估计可靠性。[J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):65-66.]。
