Suppr超能文献

护理专业学生开展 Q 方法学研究的观点。

Viewpoints on Undergraduate Research Among Nursing Students Conducting Q-Methodology Studies.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2021 Feb 1;60(2):96-98. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20210120-07.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This article describes using Q-methodology to evaluate changes in attitudes about research among baccalaureate nursing students conducting Q-methodology studies as part of an undergraduate honors research program.

METHOD

Five senior students, who had designed Q-methodology studies, sorted 36 opinion statements about undergraduate research based on two conditions of instruction: (a) according to their current attitudes, and (b) according to their beliefs before they began the honors program.

RESULTS

A two-factor final solution explained 70% of the variance. The Getting Ahead section of the study, associated with six sorting grids, also known as sorts, reflected positive beliefs about the professional benefits of engaging in undergraduate research. The Too Much Effort theme reflected beliefs held by three participants prior to engaging in the program.

CONCLUSION

After engaging in an undergraduate research honors program where participants designed a Q-methodology study, this group of students reported gaining intellectual and practical skills and no longer found research to be as intimidating. [J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):96-98.].

摘要

背景

本文描述了使用 Q 方法学评估护理专业学士学生在本科荣誉研究项目中进行 Q 方法学研究时对研究态度的变化。

方法

5 名高年级学生设计了 Q 方法学研究,根据两种指导条件对 36 条关于本科研究的观点陈述进行了排序:(a) 根据他们当前的态度,和(b) 根据他们开始荣誉项目前的信念。

结果

一个两因素最终解决方案解释了 70%的方差。研究的“取得进步”部分,与六个排序格,也称为排序,反映了对从事本科研究的专业益处的积极信念。“太多努力”主题反映了三个参与者在参与该项目之前持有的信念。

结论

在参与了一个本科研究荣誉项目后,参与者设计了一个 Q 方法学研究,这群学生报告说他们获得了智力和实践技能,不再觉得研究那么令人生畏。[J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):96-98.].

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验