• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

忙碌一线临床医生参与临床研究的有意义选择。

Options for Meaningful Engagement in Clinical Research for Busy Frontline Clinicians.

机构信息

Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2100-2104. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06587-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06587-3
PMID:33528778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8298624/
Abstract

In order for health care innovations to be effective and actionable, they must align with the needs and practice patterns of those delivering care at the bedside. While research has started to incorporate the patient voice, it has yet to fully invest in the expertise of frontline clinicians. Frontline clinicians carry a wealth of clinical knowledge and the lived experience of providing real-world medical care that the research community seeks to improve. We consider options for clinicians as research stakeholders along a continuum of engagement as outlined by the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute from minimal to supportive to participatory. In order to make an effective value proposition to support reallocation of clinician time to research engagement, we advocate evaluating the impact of clinicians as stakeholders at both the process level (e.g., clinician satisfaction, study recruitment rates) and endpoint level (e.g., clinical outcomes). Investing in clinicians as research stakeholders can offer benefits for the individual, health system, and population by increasing the generalizability, adoption, and sustainability of effective interventions.

摘要

为了使医疗保健创新有效且可行,它们必须符合在床边提供护理的人员的需求和实践模式。虽然研究已经开始纳入患者的意见,但尚未充分利用一线临床医生的专业知识。一线临床医生拥有丰富的临床知识和提供实际医疗护理的经验,这是研究界希望改进的。我们考虑了将临床医生作为研究利益相关者的各种选择,这些选择沿着 UCSF 临床和转化科学研究所概述的参与度连续体,从最低限度的支持到参与式。为了向支持重新分配临床医生时间用于研究的提议提供有效的价值主张,我们主张在过程层面(例如,临床医生满意度、研究招募率)和终点层面(例如,临床结果)评估临床医生作为利益相关者的影响。通过提高有效干预措施的普遍性、采用率和可持续性,将临床医生作为研究利益相关者进行投资可以为个人、医疗系统和人群带来好处。

相似文献

1
Options for Meaningful Engagement in Clinical Research for Busy Frontline Clinicians.忙碌一线临床医生参与临床研究的有意义选择。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2100-2104. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06587-3. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
2
Frontline Clinician Appraisement of Research Engagement: "I feel out of touch with research".临床一线工作者对研究参与度的评价:“我觉得自己与研究脱节了”。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Sep;38(12):2671-2677. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08200-9. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
How do stakeholders from multiple hierarchical levels of a large provincial health system define engagement? A qualitative study.多层面大型省级卫生系统的利益相关者如何定义参与?一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 1;12(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0625-5.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare.应用 i-PARIHS 框架增强对互动传播的理解,以实现原住民初级医疗的广泛改善。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 29;16(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0392-z.
9
Integrating the complexity of healthcare improvement with implementation science: a longitudinal qualitative case study.将医疗保健改进的复杂性与实施科学相结合:一项纵向定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07505-5.
10
From policy to practice: implementing frontline community health services for substance dependence--study protocol.从政策到实践:实施针对药物依赖的一线社区卫生服务——研究方案
Implement Sci. 2014 Aug 20;9:108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0108-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Adopting Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Underserved Communities (ASPIRE): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.在服务不足社区采用自测血压监测(ASPIRE):一项试点随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09646-9.
2
Barriers and Enablers of Primary Healthcare Professionals in Health Research Engagement: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.初级医疗保健专业人员参与健康研究的障碍与促进因素:定性研究的系统综述
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70022.
3
Engaging primary care professionals in OECD's international PaRIS survey: a documentary analysis.参与经合组织国际 PaRIS 调查的初级保健专业人员:文献分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 4;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01170-2.
4
Engaging clinical partners in pragmatic clinical trials: lessons learned from the pain management collaboratory.让临床合作伙伴参与务实的临床试验:从疼痛管理协作实验室获得的经验教训。
Pain Med. 2024 Nov 1;25(Supplement_1):S80-S82. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae055.
5
Generalizability of the Necrotizing Enterocolitis Surgery Trial to the Target Population of Eligible Infants.将坏死性小肠结肠炎手术试验推广到合格婴儿目标人群的普遍性。
J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;262:113453. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113453. Epub 2023 May 9.
6
Optimizing team science in an academic medical center: A qualitative examination of investigator perspectives.优化学术医疗中心的团队科学:对研究者观点的定性研究
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jan 23;7(1):e57. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.3. eCollection 2023.
7
Research Inclusion Across the Lifespan: A Good Start, but There Is More Work to Be Done.全生命周期研究纳入:良好开端,但仍需努力。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1966-1969. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08182-8. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
8
Context-specific adaptation of an eHealth-facilitated, integrated care model and tailoring its implementation strategies-A mixed-methods study as a part of the SMILe implementation science project.电子健康促进的综合护理模式针对具体情境的适应性调整及其实施策略的定制——作为SMILe实施科学项目一部分的混合方法研究
Front Health Serv. 2023 Feb 17;2:977564. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.977564. eCollection 2022.
9
Considerations for supporting meaningful stakeholder engagement in global mental health research.支持全球心理健康研究中具有意义的利益相关者参与的考虑因素。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Jul 20;31:e54. doi: 10.1017/S204579602200035X.

本文引用的文献

1
What influences allied health clinician participation in research in the public hospital setting: a qualitative theory-informed approach.哪些因素影响公立医院环境下的专职医疗人员参与研究:一种基于理论的定性研究方法。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036183.
2
Primary care perspectives on implementation of clinical trial recruitment.基层医疗对临床试验招募实施的看法。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Dec 26;4(1):61-68. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.435. eCollection 2020 Feb.
3
Millennials in Medicine: Cross-Trained Physicians Not Valued in Medical Marketplace.医学领域的千禧一代:经过交叉培训的医生在医疗市场中不受重视。
Fed Pract. 2019 Dec;36(12):574-578.
4
Clinician engagement in research as a path toward the learning health system: A regional survey across the northwestern United States.临床医生参与研究以迈向学习型医疗体系:美国西北部地区的一项区域性调查。
Health Serv Manage Res. 2020 Feb;33(1):33-42. doi: 10.1177/0951484819858830. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
5
Using Stakeholder Engagement to Overcome Barriers to Implementing Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) in Cancer Care Delivery: Approaches From 3 Prospective Studies.利用利益相关者参与克服癌症护理提供中实施患者报告结局(PROs)的障碍:来自 3 项前瞻性研究的方法。
Med Care. 2019 May;57 Suppl 5 Suppl 1:S92-S99. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001103.
6
Enhancing translational researchers' ability to collaborate with community stakeholders: Lessons from the Community Engagement Studio.提高转化研究人员与社区利益相关者合作的能力:来自社区参与工作室的经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug;2(4):201-207. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.323. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
7
Research capacity building frameworks for allied health professionals - a systematic review.联合健康专业人员的研究能力建设框架——一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3518-7.
8
How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.如何让利益相关者参与研究:支持改进的设计原则。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6.
9
Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review.将研究文化嵌入到辅助健康实践中的框架:快速综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Mar 21;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0304-2.
10
Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review.指南实施中的障碍与策略——一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jun 29;4(3):36. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030036.