Matheson Mark, Skinner Ian W, Vehagen Arianne, Auliffe Sean Mc, Malliaras Peter
Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Allied Health, Exercise and Sports Sciences, Port Macquarie Campuses, Charles Sturt University, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia.
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Mar;27(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70022.
Health professional engagement ensures relevant, clinically focused research that informs evidence-based care. Research shows health professionals may not engage optimally in research. Understanding barriers and enablers influencing participation is necessary to enhance engagement. This systematic review explores these factors among primary healthcare professionals. We searched peer-reviewed studies using CINAHL, Medline, and SCOPUS in February 2023, updated in June 2024. The review followed PRISMA and the ENTREQ checklist. Studies included those published in English, reporting factors influencing engagement among primary healthcare professionals. Qualitative data were extracted and thematically synthesized. Methodological quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Nineteen studies were included. Enablers include individual positive attitudes and a scholarly environment. Barriers include negative attitudes, an unconducive environment, and system constraints. Primary health professionals view research engagement positively, recognizing its potential to enhance health outcomes, professional growth, and business performance. Balancing clinical responsibilities, workload and research is challenging. Targeted strategies promoting partnerships and stakeholder involvement can foster a scholarly environment and empower research engagement.
卫生专业人员的参与可确保开展相关的、以临床为重点的研究,为循证护理提供依据。研究表明,卫生专业人员可能无法充分参与研究。了解影响参与的障碍和促进因素对于提高参与度至关重要。本系统评价探讨了基层医疗保健专业人员中的这些因素。我们于2023年2月使用CINAHL、Medline和SCOPUS检索了同行评审研究,并于2024年6月进行了更新。该评价遵循PRISMA和ENTREQ清单。纳入的研究包括以英文发表的、报告影响基层医疗保健专业人员参与因素的研究。提取定性数据并进行主题综合分析。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所批判性评价清单评估方法学质量。纳入了19项研究。促进因素包括个人的积极态度和学术环境。障碍包括消极态度、不利环境和系统限制。基层卫生专业人员对研究参与持积极态度,认识到其在改善健康结果、促进职业发展和提高业务绩效方面的潜力。平衡临床责任、工作量和研究工作具有挑战性。促进伙伴关系和利益相关者参与的针对性策略可以营造学术环境并增强研究参与度。