Spittle Ashleigh, Britcliffe Alex, Hamilton Mark Joh
Royal Darwin Hospital, 105 Rocklands Drive, Tiwi, NT 0810, Australia.
National Critical Care and Trauma Response Centre, PO Box 41326, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia.
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 3;9(6):e16993. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16993. eCollection 2023 Jun.
The spleen is the most commonly injured organ in abdominal trauma. Guidelines suggest non-operative management (NOM) is preferred over splenectomy for all haemodynamically stable patients, regardless of injury severity. The availability of splenic angioembolization has been shown to improve outcomes for high-grade splenic injuries by decreasing failure rates of NOM. Trauma incidence and fatality rates are higher in regional and remote areas, and rurality is associated with increased mortality from trauma. Additionally, rural hospitals have difficulty with staff retention and may offer less specialist services compared with urban centres.
A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Royal Darwin Hospital, using the National Critical Care and Trauma Response Centre database. All patients with splenic injury admitted between January 2018 and December 2021 were selected, and divided into control and intervention cohorts, before and after January 1, 2020, correlating with interventional radiology availability. Demographic information included age, gender, mechanism of injury, AIS grade of splenic injury, injury severity score, and shock index. The primary outcome was management of splenic injury and failure rate of NOM. Secondary outcomes included mortality, ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay.
Sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria, 32 controls and 34 interventions. Intervention and control groups were statistically similar for baseline demographics, and outcome measures of mortality and ICU length of stay. There was significant difference in the management of splenic injury, either OM or NOM, between intervention and control cohorts among high-grade splenic injury patients (AIS grade 4 and 5). In logistic regression analysis, the absence of interventional radiology was associated with increased OM (OR 12.8, SE 15.7, p = 0.04, 95%CI 1.15-142).
The absence of an interventional radiology service was associated with an increased risk of operative management, suggesting interventional radiology helps to prevent splenectomy, improving long term outcomes for splenic trauma patients in regional settings. The effects of availability of IR seen in international publications on decreased mortality and shorter length of stay were not replicated in this study.
脾脏是腹部创伤中最常受损的器官。指南建议,对于所有血流动力学稳定的患者,无论损伤严重程度如何,非手术治疗(NOM)优于脾切除术。脾血管栓塞术的应用已被证明可通过降低NOM的失败率来改善重度脾损伤的治疗效果。在偏远地区,创伤发病率和死亡率更高,农村地区与创伤死亡率增加有关。此外,农村医院在留住员工方面存在困难,与城市中心相比,可能提供的专科服务较少。
在皇家达尔文医院进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究,使用国家重症监护和创伤反应中心数据库。选取2018年1月至2021年12月期间收治的所有脾损伤患者,根据介入放射学服务的可获得性,分为2020年1月1日之前和之后的对照组和干预组。人口统计学信息包括年龄、性别、损伤机制、脾损伤的简明损伤定级(AIS)分级、损伤严重程度评分和休克指数。主要结局是脾损伤的治疗及NOM的失败率。次要结局包括死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和住院时间。
66例患者符合纳入标准,32例为对照组,34例为干预组。干预组和对照组在基线人口统计学、死亡率和ICU住院时间的结局指标方面在统计学上相似。在重度脾损伤患者(AIS 4级和5级)中,干预组和对照组在脾损伤的治疗(手术治疗或NOM)方面存在显著差异。在逻辑回归分析中,没有介入放射学服务与手术治疗增加相关(比值比12.8,标准误15.7,p = 0.04,95%置信区间1.15 - 142)。
没有介入放射学服务与手术治疗风险增加相关,提示介入放射学有助于预防脾切除术,改善偏远地区脾创伤患者的长期治疗效果。本研究未重现国际出版物中所见的介入放射学服务可获得性对降低死亡率和缩短住院时间的影响。