Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Mycology Reference Centre Manchester, ECMM Centre of Mycological Excellence, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Respir Med. 2021 Mar;178:106290. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106290. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Prevalence of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is ~3 million patients worldwide, and detection of Aspergillus-specific antibody is a critical diagnostic component. Some patients with CPA have subtle immune deficits possibly contributing to poor Aspergillus antibody production and false negative results.
MATERIALS/METHODS: We analyzed patient data from 167 cases of clinically confirmed CPA previously evaluated by ImmunoCAP Aspergillus-specific IgG EIA, Bordier ELISA and LDBio Aspergillus IgG/IgM ICT lateral flow assay, to identify deficiencies in: mannose binding lectin (MBL), IgG, IgA, IgM, IFN gamma, IL12 or IL17 production, and/or low cell marker counts (CD4, CD19, CD56). We defined patients as 'sero-negative' if ImmunoCAP Aspergillus IgG was consistently and repeatedly negative (<40 mg A/L). 'Sero-positive' was defined as all other CPA cases.
We found the rate of false negatives by ImmunoCAP Aspergillus IgG EIA (n = 23) to be more prevalent in patients with immunodeficiency markers, especially multiple defects. MBL deficiency combined with low CD19 cells (p < 0.001), pneumococcal antibody levels (p = 0.043), IgM (p = 0.047) or three combined (p = 0.001-0.018) or all four together (p = 0.018) were significant. The performance LDBio Aspergillus IgG/IgM ICT appears to be relatively unaffected by immunodeficiency (92.7% of ImmunoCap sero-negatives were positive). The Bordier assay performed significantly better than the ImmunoCAP assay (P = 0.0016) for sero-negative CPA cases.
In select cases of CPA, ImmunoCAP EIA yields a false negative result, making serological diagnosis difficult. ImmunoCAP false negatives are more prevalent in patients with multiple immunological defects, who may still be positive with the LDBio Aspergillus ICT or Bordier EIA.
全球慢性肺曲霉病(CPA)的患病率约为 300 万例,检测曲霉特异性抗体是关键的诊断组成部分。一些 CPA 患者可能存在轻微的免疫缺陷,这可能导致曲霉抗体产生不良和假阴性结果。
材料/方法:我们分析了 167 例经临床证实的 CPA 患者的数据,这些患者此前曾接受过 ImmunoCAP 曲霉特异性 IgG EIA、Bordier ELISA 和 LDBio 曲霉 IgG/IgM ICT 侧向流动检测,以确定甘露糖结合凝集素(MBL)、IgG、IgA、IgM、IFNγ、IL12 或 IL17 产生缺陷,以及/或细胞标志物计数(CD4、CD19、CD56)低。如果 ImmunoCAP 曲霉 IgG 持续且反复呈阴性(<40mgA/L),我们将患者定义为“血清阴性”。“血清阳性”定义为所有其他 CPA 病例。
我们发现,通过 ImmunoCAP 曲霉 IgG EIA 检测到的假阴性率(n=23)在存在免疫缺陷标志物的患者中更为常见,尤其是存在多种缺陷的患者。MBL 缺陷合并低 CD19 细胞(p<0.001)、肺炎球菌抗体水平(p=0.043)、IgM(p=0.047)或三者同时存在(p=0.001-0.018)或全部同时存在(p=0.018)具有显著意义。LDBio 曲霉 IgG/IgM ICT 的性能似乎不受免疫缺陷的影响(ImmunoCap 血清阴性的 92.7%为阳性)。Bordier 检测法的性能明显优于 ImmunoCAP 检测法(P=0.0016),对血清阴性的 CPA 病例更为有效。
在一些 CPA 病例中,ImmunoCAP EIA 会产生假阴性结果,使血清学诊断变得困难。ImmunoCAP 假阴性在存在多种免疫缺陷的患者中更为常见,这些患者可能仍对 LDBio 曲霉 ICT 或 Bordier EIA 呈阳性。