• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国各县无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定的小区域估计。

Small-Area Estimation of Smoke-Free Workplace Policies and Home Rules in US Counties.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Center for Statistical Research and Methodology, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 4;23(8):1300-1307. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab015.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntab015
PMID:33532860
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8517964/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The workplace and home are sources of exposure to secondhand smoke, a serious health hazard for nonsmoking adults and children. Smoke-free workplace policies and home rules protect nonsmoking individuals from secondhand smoke and help individuals who smoke to quit smoking. However, estimated population coverages of smoke-free workplace policies and home rules are not typically available at small geographic levels such as counties. Model-based small-area estimation techniques are needed to produce such estimates.

METHODS

Self-reported smoke-free workplace policies and home rules data came from the 2014-2015 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey. County-level design-based estimates of the two measures were computed and linked to county-level relevant covariates obtained from external sources. Hierarchical Bayesian models were then built and implemented through Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods.

RESULTS

Model-based estimates of smoke-free workplace policies and home rules were produced for 3134 (of 3143) US counties. In 2014-2015, nearly 80% of US adult workers were covered by smoke-free workplace policies, and more than 85% of US adults were covered by smoke-free home rules. We found large variations within and between states in the coverage of smoke-free workplace policies and home rules.

CONCLUSIONS

The small-area modeling approach efficiently reduced the variability that was attributable to small sample size in the direct estimates for counties with data and predicted estimates for counties without data by borrowing strength from covariates and other counties with similar profiles. The county-level modeled estimates can serve as a useful resource for tobacco control research and intervention.

IMPLICATIONS

Detailed county- and state-level estimates of smoke-free workplace policies and home rules can help identify coverage disparities and differential impact of smoke-free legislation and related social norms. Moreover, this estimation framework can be useful for modeling different tobacco control variables and applied elsewhere, for example, to other behavioral, policy, or health related topics.

摘要

简介

工作场所和家庭是接触二手烟的场所,二手烟对不吸烟的成年人和儿童是严重的健康危害。无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定可以保护不吸烟的个人免受二手烟的侵害,并帮助吸烟的个人戒烟。然而,通常无法在小地理区域(如县)获得无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定的估计人群覆盖率。需要基于模型的小区域估计技术来生成此类估计值。

方法

2014-2015 年烟草使用补充当前人口调查的数据来自自我报告的无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定。计算了这两个措施的县一级基于设计的估计值,并将其与从外部来源获得的县一级相关协变量进行了链接。然后建立并实施了分层贝叶斯模型,通过马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法实现。

结果

为 3143 个(3134 个)美国县生成了无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定的基于模型的估计值。在 2014-2015 年,近 80%的美国成年工人受到无烟工作场所政策的覆盖,超过 85%的美国成年人受到无烟家庭规定的覆盖。我们发现,在州内和州之间,无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定的覆盖范围存在很大差异。

结论

通过从协变量和其他具有相似特征的县借用力量来减少直接估计值的变异性,该小区域建模方法有效地减少了数据中县的变异性和数据中无县的预测估计值的变异性。基于模型的县一级估计值可以作为烟草控制研究和干预的有用资源。

意义

详细的县和州一级无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定的估计值可以帮助识别覆盖差距和无烟立法及相关社会规范的不同影响。此外,该估计框架可用于建模不同的烟草控制变量,并在其他地方应用,例如,用于其他行为、政策或健康相关主题。

相似文献

1
Small-Area Estimation of Smoke-Free Workplace Policies and Home Rules in US Counties.美国各县无烟工作场所政策和家庭规定的小区域估计。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 4;23(8):1300-1307. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab015.
2
Changes in Self-Reported Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage Among Employed Adults-United States, 2003 and 2010-2011.自报工作场所无烟政策覆盖情况的变化——美国,2003 年和 2010-2011 年。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Sep 25;20(11):1327-1335. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx202.
3
Workplace Smoke-Free Policies and Cessation Programs Among U.S. Working Adults.美国成年劳动者工作场所无烟政策和戒烟计划。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Apr;56(4):548-562. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.030. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
Exposure to secondhand smoke and voluntary adoption of smoke-free home and car rules among non-smoking South African adults.南非非吸烟成年人接触二手烟情况及无烟家庭和汽车规则的自愿采用情况。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 10;14:580. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-580.
5
Home Tobacco Use Policies and Exposure to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke: Findings from Waves 1 through 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.家庭烟草使用政策与二手烟暴露:人群烟草和健康评估(PATH)研究第 1 至 4 波的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9719. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189719.
6
Municipal smoke-free laws and preterm birth.城市无烟法律与早产
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Nov;227(5):767.e1-767.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.058. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
7
Home Smoke-Free Policies as Children Age: Urban, Rural, and Suburban Differences.家庭无烟政策随儿童年龄变化:城市、农村和郊区的差异。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Nov 12;24(12):1985-1993. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac186.
8
Smoke-free home and vehicle rules by tobacco use status among US adults.美国成年人中按烟草使用状况划分的无烟家庭和车辆规则
Prev Med. 2015 Sep;78:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
9
Associations of Smoke-Free Policies in Restaurants, Bars, and Workplaces With Blood Pressure Changes in the CARDIA Study.餐厅、酒吧和工作场所实施无烟政策与 CARDIA 研究中血压变化的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 4;7(23):e009829. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009829.
10
Workplace Secondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure Among U.S. Nonsmoking Workers, 2015.2015 年美国非吸烟工人的工作场所二手烟暴露情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Jul 12;68(27):604-607. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6827a2.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability in self-reported and biomarker-derived tobacco smoke exposure patterns among individuals who do not smoke by poverty income ratio in the USA.美国按贫困收入比率划分的不吸烟个体中,自我报告的和生物标志物衍生的烟草烟雾暴露模式的变异性。
Tob Control. 2024 Jul 14. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058512.
2
Association of cigarette excise taxes and clean indoor air laws with change in smoking behavior in the United States: a Markov modeling analysis.美国香烟消费税和室内清洁空气法与吸烟行为变化的关联:一项马尔可夫模型分析
J Public Health Policy. 2024 Mar;45(1):100-113. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00458-x. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
3
Trends in the Incidence of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers by County-Level Income and Smoking Prevalence in the United States, 2000-2018.2000-2018 年美国按县收入水平和吸烟率划分的人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症发病率趋势。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 Mar 2;6(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac004.
4
Home Tobacco Use Policies and Exposure to Secondhand Tobacco Smoke: Findings from Waves 1 through 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study.家庭烟草使用政策与二手烟暴露:人群烟草和健康评估(PATH)研究第 1 至 4 波的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9719. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189719.

本文引用的文献

1
Smoke-Free Policies and Smoking Cessation in the United States, 2003-2015.美国 2003-2015 年无烟政策与戒烟情况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 2;16(17):3200. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173200.
2
Small Area Estimation of Cancer Risk Factors and Screening Behaviors in US Counties by Combining Two Large National Health Surveys.利用两项大型国家健康调查数据,对美国各县的癌症风险因素和筛查行为进行小区域估计。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Aug 29;16:E119. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190013.
3
A qualitative study of the process of adoption, implementation and enforcement of smoke-free policies in privately-owned affordable housing.一项关于在私人经济适用房内实施和执行禁烟政策的采纳、实施和执行过程的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 8;19(1):1071. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7404-y.
4
Correction: Income disparities in smoking cessation and the diffusion of smoke-free homes among U.S. smokers: Results from two longitudinal surveys.更正:美国吸烟者戒烟方面的收入差距及无烟家庭的传播:两项纵向调查结果
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0208153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208153. eCollection 2018.
5
Smoke-Free Policies: No Time to Waste.无烟政策:刻不容缓。
Circulation. 2018 Aug 7;138(6):567-569. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035337.
6
Moderators of Establishing a Smoke-Free Home: Pooled Data from Three Randomized Controlled Trials of a Brief Intervention.建立无烟家庭的影响因素:简短干预措施的三项随机对照试验的汇总数据。
J Community Health. 2019 Feb;44(1):121-126. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0561-6.
7
Tobacco control in California compared with the rest of the USA: trends in adult per capita cigarette consumption.加利福尼亚州与美国其他地区的烟草控制比较:成年人人均香烟消费量趋势。
Tob Control. 2018 Oct;27(e2):e112-e117. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053895. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Changes in Self-Reported Smokefree Workplace Policy Coverage Among Employed Adults-United States, 2003 and 2010-2011.自报工作场所无烟政策覆盖情况的变化——美国,2003 年和 2010-2011 年。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Sep 25;20(11):1327-1335. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx202.
9
Multilevel Small-Area Estimation of Multiple Cigarette Smoking Status Categories Using the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.使用2012年行为危险因素监测系统对多种吸烟状况类别进行多水平小区域估计。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Oct;25(10):1402-1410. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0244.
10
Using Small-Area Estimation to Calculate the Prevalence of Smoking by Subcounty Geographic Areas in King County, Washington, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2009-2013.利用小区域估计法计算华盛顿州金县按次县级地理区域划分的吸烟流行率,行为风险因素监测系统,2009 - 2013年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 May 5;13:E59. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150536.