Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:2150132721990180. doi: 10.1177/2150132721990180.
To collect data and gain an understanding of parental satisfaction with and attitudes toward treatment in a pediatric integrated primary care (IPC) model.
Primary data were collected across the United States over the course of a few months.
The 35-item, Parent Acceptance of Pediatric Integrated Care Survey (PAPICS) was developed by a panel of IPC experts. The survey was then distributed through the Qualtrics Panels Service with recruited participants (i.e., parents with children under 18-years-old) receiving a $4.00 incentive for their involvement.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: A single exploratory factor analysis was performed along with four factor retention tests and clinical judgment to guide factor selection. A 5-factor structure was selected.
Parents reported a high level of comfort with an IPC model and a favorable attitude toward child therapy, with some concerns regarding psychological stigma and privacy. Notable variation in parents' beliefs regarding one-on-one psychological service delivery were observed.
Results provided evidence for parental openness to an IPC model. Findings also highlighted potential fundamental misunderstandings regarding evidence-based psychological treatment methods for children and adolescents.
收集数据，了解父母对儿科综合初级保健（IPC）模式的治疗满意度和态度。
在美国各地收集了几个月的原始数据。
由一组 IPC 专家开发了 35 项的儿科综合护理家长接受度调查（PAPICS）。然后通过 Qualtrics Panels Service 分发调查，招募参与者（即有 18 岁以下儿童的父母）参与可获得 4 美元的奖励。
资料收集/提取方法：进行了单因素探索性因素分析，以及四项因素保留测试和临床判断，以指导因素选择。选择了 5 因素结构。
父母对 IPC 模式表示高度舒适，对儿童治疗持有利态度，但对心理污名和隐私问题表示关注。观察到父母对一对一心理服务提供的看法存在显著差异。
研究结果为父母对 IPC 模式的开放性提供了证据。研究结果还突出了对儿童和青少年循证心理治疗方法的潜在根本误解。
