• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反应抑制在时间准备中的作用:来自 Go/No-Go 任务的证据。

The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: evidence from a go/no-go task.

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):328-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.013
PMID:23969298
Abstract

During the foreperiod (FP) of a warned reaction task, participants engage in a process of temporal preparation to speed response to the impending target stimulus. Previous neurophysiological studies have shown that inhibition is applied during FP to prevent premature response. Previous behavioral studies have shown that the duration of FP on both the current and the preceding trial codetermine response time to the target. Integrating these findings, the present study tested the hypothesis that the behavioral effects find their origin in response inhibition on the preceding trial. In two experiments the variable-FP paradigm was combined with a go/no-go task, in which no-go stimuli required explicit response inhibition. The resulting data pattern revealed sequential effects of both FP (long or short) and response requirement (go or no-go), which could be jointly understood as expressions of response inhibition, consistent with the hypothesis.

摘要

在预警反应任务的预备期(FP),参与者进行时间准备,以加快对即将到来的目标刺激的反应。先前的神经生理学研究表明,在 FP 期间应用抑制作用,以防止过早反应。先前的行为研究表明,当前和前一个试验的 FP 持续时间共同决定了对目标的反应时间。综合这些发现,本研究检验了这样一种假设,即行为效应起源于前一个试验的反应抑制。在两项实验中,可变 FP 范式与 Go/No-Go 任务相结合,其中 No-Go 刺激需要明确的反应抑制。所得数据模式揭示了 FP(长或短)和反应要求(Go 或 No-Go)的顺序效应,这可以共同理解为反应抑制的表达,与假设一致。

相似文献

1
The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: evidence from a go/no-go task.反应抑制在时间准备中的作用:来自 Go/No-Go 任务的证据。
Cognition. 2013 Nov;129(2):328-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
2
Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.短前期情境中的序列效应:时间准备的条件作用解释的证据
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Oct;129(2):297-307. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.08.005.
3
Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.时间准备的动态调整:改变警告信号模态可减弱序列前周期效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 Sep;132(1):40-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
4
Arousal modulates temporal preparation under increased time uncertainty: Evidence from higher-order sequential foreperiod effects.在时间不确定性增加的情况下,唤醒调节时间准备:来自高阶序列前周期效应的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
5
Dissociating temporal preparation processes as a function of the inter-trial interval duration.根据试验间间隔时长来区分时间准备过程。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
6
The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?转换成本的起源:任务准备还是任务执行?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Oct;63(10):1895-915. doi: 10.1080/17470211003651849. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
7
Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.预刺激加工对警示Go/NoGo范式中后续事件的影响:反应准备、执行与抑制
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):121-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.07.013. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
8
Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance.简单反应时任务中的心理疲劳与时间准备
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jan;133(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
9
Functional dissociations in temporal preparation: evidence from dual-task performance.时间准备中的功能分离:来自双重任务表现的证据。
Cognition. 2014 Feb;130(2):141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity.时间准备、反应抑制和冲动性。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Aug;73(3):222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing cognitive and motor performance through mental training: The interplay between temporal preparation, inhibition and autonomic arousal.通过心理训练提高认知和运动表现:时间准备、抑制和自主唤醒之间的相互作用。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01301-4.
2
Go/No-Go Ratios Modulate Inhibition-Related Brain Activity: An Event-Related Potential Study.“去/不去”比率调节与抑制相关的脑活动:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 24;14(5):414. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050414.
3
Sequential effect and temporal orienting in prestimulus oculomotor inhibition.
刺激前眼球运动抑制中的序列效应和时间定向。
J Vis. 2023 Dec 4;23(14):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.14.1.
4
Modality-specific sensory and decisional carryover effects in duration perception.特定感觉模式和决策的时间知觉转移效应。
BMC Biol. 2023 Mar 8;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01547-9.
5
Effects of a neutral warning signal under increased temporal uncertainty.增加时间不确定性下中性警告信号的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1346-1357. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01404-8. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Implicitly learning when to be ready: From instances to categories.从实例到类别:学习何时准备就绪的隐式方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Apr;29(2):552-562. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-02004-w. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Implicit learning of non-verbal regularities by deaf children with cochlear implants: An investigation with a dynamic temporal prediction task.聋童人工耳蜗植入后对非言语规则的内隐学习:一项采用动态时间预测任务的研究。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251050. eCollection 2021.
8
Transfer effects in auditory temporal preparation occur using an unfilled but not filled foreperiod.听觉时间准备中的转移效应发生在使用未填充但未填充的前时段。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Aug;74(8):1432-1438. doi: 10.1177/1747021821995452. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
9
Temporal productions in a variable environment: timing starts from stimulus identification rather than onset.在多变环境下的时间产出:时间的起始源自于对刺激的识别,而不是刺激的出现。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2792-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01430-0. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice?任务的时间可预测性是否会影响任务选择?
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):1066-1083. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01297-1. Epub 2020 Feb 17.