Smolev Emma T, Rolf Liz, Zhu Eric, Buday Sarah K, Brody Madison, Brogan David M, Dy Christopher J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2021 Jan;3(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
Brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients use on-line groups for peer support, often seeking information from Facebook groups devoted to BPI. We hypothesized that a qualitative thematic analysis of posts from BPI Facebook groups would demonstrate the areas in which patients were seeking information regarding treatment of BPI and reveal potential sources of misinformation that patients may encounter.
We identified the 2 most popular public Facebook groups for BPI by searching key words "traumatic brachial plexus injury." We selected posts containing comments regarding BPI from November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019. We excluded posts regarding brachial plexus birth injury. We used iterative inductive and deductive thematic analysis for the qualitative data to identify recurring topics, knowledge gaps, potential roles of patient educational interventions, and patient interaction dynamics. Two investigators independently coded all posts and resolved discrepancies by discussion.
A total of 7,694 posts from 2 leading Facebook support groups were analyzed. Three themes emerged: (1) When discussing pain management, there was recurring anti-opioid sentiment. Posters who currently used opioids or supported those who did discussed perceived effects of the opioid epidemic on their treatment, on their relationships with care providers, and on availability of the medication. (2) Posters advocated for alternatives to traditional approaches to pain management, referring to prescribers as pill pushers and touting cannabinoids as a safer and more effective replacement. (3) There was strong anti-gabapentinoid sentiment owing to reported adverse effects and a perceived lack of efficacy, despite its role as a first-line treatment for neuropathic pain.
Examination of posts from Facebook support groups for BPI revealed recurring themes, questions, misinformation, and opinions from posters with regard to treatment of neuropathic pain. These findings can help clinicians who care for BPI patients identify areas to focus on during patient encounters to address neuropathic pain that commonly occurs with BPI.
Brachial plexus injury surgeons should be aware of information, misinformation, and opinions on social media, because these may influence patientesurgeon interactions.
臂丛神经损伤(BPI)患者利用在线群组获得同伴支持,经常从专注于BPI的脸书群组中寻求信息。我们假设,对BPI脸书群组中的帖子进行定性主题分析,将能展示患者在寻求BPI治疗信息的领域,并揭示患者可能遇到的错误信息来源。
通过搜索关键词“创伤性臂丛神经损伤”,我们确定了脸书上最受欢迎的2个BPI公共群组。我们选择了2018年11月1日至2019年10月31日期间包含关于BPI评论的帖子。我们排除了关于臂丛神经产伤的帖子。我们对定性数据采用迭代归纳和演绎主题分析,以确定反复出现的主题、知识空白、患者教育干预的潜在作用以及患者互动动态。两名研究人员独立对所有帖子进行编码,并通过讨论解决分歧。
共分析了来自2个主要脸书支持群组的7694条帖子。出现了三个主题:(1)在讨论疼痛管理时,反复出现反阿片类药物情绪。当前使用阿片类药物或支持使用阿片类药物的发帖者讨论了阿片类药物流行对其治疗、与医疗服务提供者关系以及药物可及性的感知影响。(2)发帖者主张采用替代传统疼痛管理方法,将开处方者称为“药丸推手”,并吹捧大麻素是一种更安全、更有效的替代品。(3)尽管加巴喷丁类药物是神经性疼痛的一线治疗药物,但由于报道的不良反应和感知到的疗效不佳,出现了强烈的反加巴喷丁类药物情绪。
对BPI脸书支持群组中的帖子进行检查,揭示了发帖者在神经性疼痛治疗方面反复出现的主题、问题、错误信息和观点。这些发现可以帮助照顾BPI患者的临床医生确定在患者就诊期间需要关注的领域,以解决BPI常见的神经性疼痛。
臂丛神经损伤外科医生应了解社交媒体上的信息、错误信息和观点,因为这些可能会影响医患互动。